Meaningful Engagement of People Living With Noncommunicable Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735231224560
Mark Thomaz Ugliara Barone, E. Klatman
{"title":"Meaningful Engagement of People Living With Noncommunicable Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Mark Thomaz Ugliara Barone, E. Klatman","doi":"10.1177/23743735231224560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meaningful engagement of people living with health conditions means actively incorporating them in all stages of health decision-making. Despite efforts by global health agencies and governments towards meaningful engagement of people living with noncommunicable diseases (PLWNCDs), many opportunities for participation are tokenistic. PLWNCDs often report feeling excluded from technical discussions and outnumbered by other stakeholders. Participation in decision-making is a human right, and PLWNCDs must continue advocating for a “nothing about us without us” approach. They should be respected as decision-makers with voice, agency, voting power, rights, and duties. This article highlights four key themes: (1) both tokenistic participation and exclusion of PLWNCDs from technical discussions are still common; (2) the “patient” label implies passivity and can perpetuate limited participation, whereas the identifier of PLWNCDs connotes valuable knowledge associated with lived experience; (3) meaningful participation of PLWNCDs in health decision-making processes should be considered a human right; (4) PLWNCD should be empowered to continue to advocate for inclusion and be respected as decision-makers.","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735231224560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meaningful engagement of people living with health conditions means actively incorporating them in all stages of health decision-making. Despite efforts by global health agencies and governments towards meaningful engagement of people living with noncommunicable diseases (PLWNCDs), many opportunities for participation are tokenistic. PLWNCDs often report feeling excluded from technical discussions and outnumbered by other stakeholders. Participation in decision-making is a human right, and PLWNCDs must continue advocating for a “nothing about us without us” approach. They should be respected as decision-makers with voice, agency, voting power, rights, and duties. This article highlights four key themes: (1) both tokenistic participation and exclusion of PLWNCDs from technical discussions are still common; (2) the “patient” label implies passivity and can perpetuate limited participation, whereas the identifier of PLWNCDs connotes valuable knowledge associated with lived experience; (3) meaningful participation of PLWNCDs in health decision-making processes should be considered a human right; (4) PLWNCD should be empowered to continue to advocate for inclusion and be respected as decision-makers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非传染性疾病患者的有意义参与:挑战与机遇
让非传染性疾病患者有意义地参与,意味着让他们积极参与卫生决策的各个阶段。尽管全球卫生机构和各国政府都在努力争取非传染性疾病患者(PLWNCDs)的有意义参与,但许多参与机会都是象征性的。非传染性疾病 PLWNCD 常常表示,他们感觉自己被排除在技术讨论之外,而且人数比其他利益相关者少。参与决策是一项人权,PLWNCD 必须继续倡导 "没有我们,就没有我们 "的方法。他们作为拥有发言权、代理权、投票权、权利和义务的决策者,应该得到尊重。本文强调了四个关键主题:(1) 象征性的参与和将 PLWNCDs 排除在技术讨论之外的情况仍很普遍;(2) "患者 "标签意味着被动性,可能会使有限的参与永久化,而 PLWNCDs 的标识则意味着与生活经验相关的宝贵知识;(3) PLWNCDs 有意义地参与健康决策过程应被视为一项人权;(4) 应赋予 PLWNCDs 权力,使其能够继续倡导包容,并作为决策者受到尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Patient Experiences with Patient-Centered and Inclusive Care in Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatient Clinics. "It was not normal, and I had to find a doctor and tell him." Kenyan Women's Response to Cervical Cancer Symptoms. Factors Associated With Psychiatry Consultation for Musculoskeletal Trauma Patients. Does an "EZ" Survey Improve the Data Quality of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1? An Adaptive Pacing Intervention for Adults Living With Long COVID: A Narrative Study of Patient Experiences of Using the PaceMe app.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1