The Effect of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Adverse Events in Health Care: A Retrospective Study in Ground and Helicopter Emergency Medical Services

Q3 Nursing Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2023.11.015
Blake Miller MS (Medical Student), Timothy J. Lenz MD, MPH, EMT-P, FAEMS, FACEP
{"title":"The Effect of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Adverse Events in Health Care: A Retrospective Study in Ground and Helicopter Emergency Medical Services","authors":"Blake Miller MS (Medical Student),&nbsp;Timothy J. Lenz MD, MPH, EMT-P, FAEMS, FACEP","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2023.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has proven to be a significant hardship for the entire world. Health care systems and their workers have been stretched to their limits. Research regarding whether this increased strain has affected patient safety has not been sufficient, especially in emergency medical services. The aim of this study was to determine if there has been an increased rate of adverse events in ground and helicopter emergency medical services since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 2-year retrospective review was performed at a Midwest regional critical care transport service. The rate of adverse events for 1-year periods before and after March 13, 2020, was the primary outcome. All adverse events that generated a quality improvement incident report form (QIRF) were included, except those generated for non–clinical-related incidents. Additionally, a smaller time frame between May 1st and August 31st of both years was included containing all flagged adverse events from peer reviewers; not all of these generated a QIRF.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the time period between March 13, 2019, and March 12, 2020, 5 of 3,154 (0.16%) calls generated a QIRF versus 21 of 3,185 (0.66%) calls between March 13, 2020, and March 12, 2021. There was a significant relationship showing an adverse event was more likely to happen after the onset of COVID-19 compared with before (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub> [N = 6,339] = 8.643, <em>P</em> ≤ .001). Additionally, from May 1st to August 31st, the total adverse event rates were 16.86% (143/848 calls) and 24.46% (387/1,582 calls) for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Similarly, statistical significance existed for adverse events occurring after onset of the pandemic versus before (χ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub> [N = 2,430] = 18.253, <em>P</em> ≤ .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A higher rate of adverse events for the year after the onset of COVID-19 existed. Additional studies looking at the causes of adverse events and patient outcomes should be undertaken to further understand this increase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 3","pages":"Pages 221-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X23002651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has proven to be a significant hardship for the entire world. Health care systems and their workers have been stretched to their limits. Research regarding whether this increased strain has affected patient safety has not been sufficient, especially in emergency medical services. The aim of this study was to determine if there has been an increased rate of adverse events in ground and helicopter emergency medical services since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A 2-year retrospective review was performed at a Midwest regional critical care transport service. The rate of adverse events for 1-year periods before and after March 13, 2020, was the primary outcome. All adverse events that generated a quality improvement incident report form (QIRF) were included, except those generated for non–clinical-related incidents. Additionally, a smaller time frame between May 1st and August 31st of both years was included containing all flagged adverse events from peer reviewers; not all of these generated a QIRF.

Results

In the time period between March 13, 2019, and March 12, 2020, 5 of 3,154 (0.16%) calls generated a QIRF versus 21 of 3,185 (0.66%) calls between March 13, 2020, and March 12, 2021. There was a significant relationship showing an adverse event was more likely to happen after the onset of COVID-19 compared with before (χ21 [N = 6,339] = 8.643, P ≤ .001). Additionally, from May 1st to August 31st, the total adverse event rates were 16.86% (143/848 calls) and 24.46% (387/1,582 calls) for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Similarly, statistical significance existed for adverse events occurring after onset of the pandemic versus before (χ21 [N = 2,430] = 18.253, P ≤ .001).

Conclusion

A higher rate of adverse events for the year after the onset of COVID-19 existed. Additional studies looking at the causes of adverse events and patient outcomes should be undertaken to further understand this increase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019 年冠状病毒疾病对医疗服务不良事件的影响:地面和直升机紧急医疗服务的回顾性研究
目标 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行已证明给全世界带来了巨大的困难。医疗保健系统及其工作人员的工作量已达到极限。有关这种压力的增加是否会影响患者安全的研究还不够充分,特别是在紧急医疗服务方面。本研究旨在确定自 COVID-19 大流行以来,地面和直升机紧急医疗服务中的不良事件发生率是否有所上升。主要结果是 2020 年 3 月 13 日之前和之后 1 年的不良事件发生率。所有产生质量改进事件报告表(QIRF)的不良事件都包括在内,但非临床相关事件除外。此外,在这两年的 5 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日之间的较小时间范围内,还包括同行评审员标记的所有不良事件;但并非所有这些事件都生成了 QIRF。结果在 2019 年 3 月 13 日至 2020 年 3 月 12 日期间,3154 次呼叫中有 5 次(0.16%)生成了 QIRF,而在 2020 年 3 月 13 日至 2021 年 3 月 12 日期间,3185 次呼叫中有 21 次(0.66%)生成了 QIRF。有显著关系显示,COVID-19 开始后发生不良事件的几率高于 COVID-19 开始前(χ21 [N = 6,339] = 8.643,P ≤ .001)。此外,从 5 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日,2019 年和 2020 年的不良事件总发生率分别为 16.86%(143/848 次呼叫)和 24.46%(387/1,582 次呼叫)。同样,大流行开始后发生的不良事件与大流行开始前发生的不良事件相比具有统计学意义(χ21 [N = 2,430] = 18.253,P ≤ .001)。为进一步了解不良事件增加的原因和患者预后,应开展更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Psychomotor Vigilance Testing on Neonatal Transport: A Western Australian Experience Pericardiocentesis During Transport for Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Recent Outcomes Research in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review of Publication Year 2023 Additions to the Helicopter Outcomes Assessment Research Database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1