Matthew E. Anton MD , Antonia L. Altomare DO, MPH , Amanda R. Blais PharmD , Jeremy C. Patten NRP , Kalle J. Fjeld MD , Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP , Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH
{"title":"Reducing Deep Sedation and Benzodiazepine Use in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During Critical Care Transport: A Quality Improvement Initiative","authors":"Matthew E. Anton MD , Antonia L. Altomare DO, MPH , Amanda R. Blais PharmD , Jeremy C. Patten NRP , Kalle J. Fjeld MD , Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP , Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Deep sedation of mechanically ventilated patients is associated with poorer outcomes, including longer hospital length of stay and more ventilator days. In contrast, light sedation is associated with decreased hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, lower ventilator days, and decreased mortality. This study sought to decrease the use of unindicated deep sedation and benzodiazepine use in mechanically ventilated patients during critical care transport. Previous work identified > 90% of intubated, nonparalyzed patients were deeply sedated in this critical care transport system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was conducted at a critical care transport service affiliated with a rural academic medical center. Chart review of all mechanically ventilated adults transported between January and November 2023 with no indication for deep sedation was performed. Improvement initiatives were implemented using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and included transport crew education, guideline revision, and enhanced performance feedback.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A 25% reduction in the proportion of deeply sedated patients was achieved.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Deep sedation is not universally indicated in critical care transport of mechanically ventilated patients. This quality improvement initiative achieved its main aim of reducing the proportion of deeply sedated patients by 25% with the implementation of 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 6","pages":"Pages 512-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24001676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Deep sedation of mechanically ventilated patients is associated with poorer outcomes, including longer hospital length of stay and more ventilator days. In contrast, light sedation is associated with decreased hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, lower ventilator days, and decreased mortality. This study sought to decrease the use of unindicated deep sedation and benzodiazepine use in mechanically ventilated patients during critical care transport. Previous work identified > 90% of intubated, nonparalyzed patients were deeply sedated in this critical care transport system.
Methods
This study was conducted at a critical care transport service affiliated with a rural academic medical center. Chart review of all mechanically ventilated adults transported between January and November 2023 with no indication for deep sedation was performed. Improvement initiatives were implemented using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and included transport crew education, guideline revision, and enhanced performance feedback.
Results
A 25% reduction in the proportion of deeply sedated patients was achieved.
Conclusion
Deep sedation is not universally indicated in critical care transport of mechanically ventilated patients. This quality improvement initiative achieved its main aim of reducing the proportion of deeply sedated patients by 25% with the implementation of 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.
期刊介绍:
Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.