Evaluating Manning's Roughness Coefficient for Flows with Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Sediment Transport

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14525/jjce.v18i1.06
Miskar Maini
{"title":"Evaluating Manning's Roughness Coefficient for Flows with Equilibrium and Non-equilibrium Sediment Transport","authors":"Miskar Maini","doi":"10.14525/jjce.v18i1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the challenges in using Manning’s equation lies in accurately determining Manning’s roughness coefficient, especially due to sediment transport. The condition of sediment transport within a specific section of a river can be in equilibrium, meaning that the amount of sediment entering and exiting the segment is balanced or it can be in non-equilibrium, where there is an imbalance between the sediment entering and leaving the segment. Experiments were carried out in the laboratory to simulate both transport conditions, one involving sediment feeding (equilibrium condition) and the other without sediment feeding (non-equilibrium condition). A total of 180 mean velocity profiles were measured using an acoustic doppler velocimeter (ADV) in fixed and movable bed flows. The present experiment was combined with theoretical approaches to evaluate Manning’s coefficient in open channels under sediment transport-flow conditions and reach conclusive results. The shape of the velocity profile, u/U, for flows over a movable bed with sediment feeding is “slender” compared to those without sediment feeding. The presence of sediment transport affects the shape of the velocity profile, especially in the inner region, influencing Manning's roughness coefficient. This coefficient can be determined from two-point velocity measurements at z/H = 0.1 and 0.2 for fixed and movable bed flows with and without sediment feeding, respectively. On average, sediment feeding increases the coefficient by 19% compared to the non-sediment feeding case. KEYWORDS: Manning’s roughness coefficient, Velocity profile, Equilibrium and non-equilibrium, Sediment transport, Open-channel flow","PeriodicalId":51814,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14525/jjce.v18i1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the challenges in using Manning’s equation lies in accurately determining Manning’s roughness coefficient, especially due to sediment transport. The condition of sediment transport within a specific section of a river can be in equilibrium, meaning that the amount of sediment entering and exiting the segment is balanced or it can be in non-equilibrium, where there is an imbalance between the sediment entering and leaving the segment. Experiments were carried out in the laboratory to simulate both transport conditions, one involving sediment feeding (equilibrium condition) and the other without sediment feeding (non-equilibrium condition). A total of 180 mean velocity profiles were measured using an acoustic doppler velocimeter (ADV) in fixed and movable bed flows. The present experiment was combined with theoretical approaches to evaluate Manning’s coefficient in open channels under sediment transport-flow conditions and reach conclusive results. The shape of the velocity profile, u/U, for flows over a movable bed with sediment feeding is “slender” compared to those without sediment feeding. The presence of sediment transport affects the shape of the velocity profile, especially in the inner region, influencing Manning's roughness coefficient. This coefficient can be determined from two-point velocity measurements at z/H = 0.1 and 0.2 for fixed and movable bed flows with and without sediment feeding, respectively. On average, sediment feeding increases the coefficient by 19% compared to the non-sediment feeding case. KEYWORDS: Manning’s roughness coefficient, Velocity profile, Equilibrium and non-equilibrium, Sediment transport, Open-channel flow
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估具有平衡和非平衡沉积物迁移的水流的曼宁粗糙度系数
使用曼宁方程的难点之一在于准确确定曼宁粗糙度系数,尤其是由于泥沙输运造成的粗糙度系数。河流特定河段内的泥沙输运条件可能处于平衡状态,即进入和流出该河段的泥沙量是平衡的;也可能处于非平衡状态,即进入和流出该河段的泥沙量不平衡。在实验室中进行了模拟这两种输运条件的实验,一种是有沉积物馈入的条件(平衡条件),另一种是没有沉积物馈入的条件(非平衡条件)。使用声学多普勒测速仪(ADV)在固定床和活动床水流中总共测量了 180 个平均流速剖面。本实验结合理论方法对泥沙输运-流动条件下明渠的曼宁系数进行了评估,并得出了结论性结果。与没有泥沙馈入的水流相比,有泥沙馈入的活动床水流速度曲线 u/U 的形状是 "细长 "的。泥沙输运会影响速度剖面的形状,尤其是在内部区域,从而影响曼宁粗糙度系数。该系数可通过分别在 z/H = 0.1 和 0.2 处对有泥沙馈入和无泥沙馈入的固定床流和活动床流进行两点速度测量来确定。与无泥沙馈入的情况相比,泥沙馈入平均增加了 19% 的系数。关键词: 曼宁粗糙度系数、流速剖面、平衡与非平衡、泥沙输运、明渠水流
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: I am very pleased and honored to be appointed as an Editor-in-Chief of the Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering which enjoys an excellent reputation, both locally and internationally. Since development is the essence of life, I hope to continue developing this distinguished Journal, building on the effort of all the Editors-in-Chief and Editorial Board Members as well as Advisory Boards of the Journal since its establishment about a decade ago. I will do my best to focus on publishing high quality diverse articles and move forward in the indexing issue of the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Mapping Floods during Cloudy Weather Using Radar Satellite Images Assessing the Accident-Cost Relationship in Building Construction Projects Using Structural Equation Modeling Detection of Sub-surface Delamination and Moisture Penetration in Unlined Rock Tunnels Using Passive Thermography and Tapping Rehabilitation of Fire-damaged Reinforced-concrete Slabs Using Ferro-cement Using Palm Oil Fuel Ash as a Source Material for Alumina Silicate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1