Optimal labor income taxation and asset distribution in an economy with no insurance market and extensive labor supply responses

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS International Tax and Public Finance Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s10797-023-09819-4
Takao Kataoka, Yoshihiro Takamatsu
{"title":"Optimal labor income taxation and asset distribution in an economy with no insurance market and extensive labor supply responses","authors":"Takao Kataoka, Yoshihiro Takamatsu","doi":"10.1007/s10797-023-09819-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine the effects of stationary nonlinear labor income tax rules in a dynamic economy, considering extensive marginal labor-leisure choices and uninsured idiosyncratic shocks on labor productivity and labor disutility. The labor income tax rule has significant implications for households’ savings behavior and asset distribution over the long-run. We derive a optimal stationary tax rules as a natural extension of optimal participation tax rule in the static models. Through numerical simulations, two main findings emerge: (i) The current optimal tax rule, aimed at maximizing welfare based on the present asset distribution level, supports in-work benefits for low-income workers as a static extensive margin model. While this policy temporarily enhances welfare, it leads to a decline in capital accumulation and a decrease in average utility flow over time. (ii) The long-run optimal tax rule, optimizing welfare when the asset distribution reaches a stationary state, exhibits less progressivity and initially worsens welfare temporarily. However, it eventually improves the average utility flow in the long-run. The long-term consequences of households’ saving behavior and asset distribution mitigate the attractiveness of in-work benefit policies. By shedding light on the trade-offs between short-term welfare gains and long-term utility improvements, this study provides insights into designing effective labor income tax policies in a dynamic economic context.</p>","PeriodicalId":47518,"journal":{"name":"International Tax and Public Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Tax and Public Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-023-09819-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the effects of stationary nonlinear labor income tax rules in a dynamic economy, considering extensive marginal labor-leisure choices and uninsured idiosyncratic shocks on labor productivity and labor disutility. The labor income tax rule has significant implications for households’ savings behavior and asset distribution over the long-run. We derive a optimal stationary tax rules as a natural extension of optimal participation tax rule in the static models. Through numerical simulations, two main findings emerge: (i) The current optimal tax rule, aimed at maximizing welfare based on the present asset distribution level, supports in-work benefits for low-income workers as a static extensive margin model. While this policy temporarily enhances welfare, it leads to a decline in capital accumulation and a decrease in average utility flow over time. (ii) The long-run optimal tax rule, optimizing welfare when the asset distribution reaches a stationary state, exhibits less progressivity and initially worsens welfare temporarily. However, it eventually improves the average utility flow in the long-run. The long-term consequences of households’ saving behavior and asset distribution mitigate the attractiveness of in-work benefit policies. By shedding light on the trade-offs between short-term welfare gains and long-term utility improvements, this study provides insights into designing effective labor income tax policies in a dynamic economic context.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无保险市场和广泛劳动力供给反应经济中的最优劳动收入税和资产分配
我们研究了动态经济中静态非线性劳动所得税规则的影响,考虑了广泛的边际劳动-休闲选择以及未投保的特异性冲击对劳动生产率和劳动效用的影响。从长期来看,劳动所得税规则对家庭的储蓄行为和资产分配有重大影响。作为静态模型中最优参与税规则的自然延伸,我们推导出了最优固定税规则。通过数值模拟,我们得出了两个主要结论:(i) 当前的最优税收规则旨在实现基于当前资产分配水平的福利最大化,在静态广义边际模型中支持为低收入工人提供在职福利。虽然这一政策暂时提高了福利,但随着时间的推移,会导致资本积累下降和平均效用流减少。(ii) 长期最优税收规则在资产分配达到静止状态时优化福利,表现出较低的累进性,最初会暂时恶化福利。但从长期来看,它最终会改善平均效用流。家庭储蓄行为和资产分布的长期后果削弱了在职福利政策的吸引力。通过揭示短期福利收益与长期效用改善之间的权衡,本研究为在动态经济背景下设计有效的劳动所得税政策提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE publishes outstanding original research, both theoretical and empirical, in all areas of public economics.  While the journal has a historical strength in open economy, international, and interjurisdictional issues, we actively encourage high-quality submissions from the breadth of public economics.The special Policy Watch section is designed to facilitate communication between the academic and public policy spheres.  This section includes timely, policy-oriented discussions. The goal is to provide a two-way forum in which academic researchers gain insight into current policy priorities and policy-makers can access academic advances in a practical way.  INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE is peer reviewed and published in one volume per year, consisting of six issues, one of which contains papers presented at the annual congress of the International Institute of Public Finance (refereed in the usual way). Officially cited as: Int Tax Public Finance
期刊最新文献
Tax revenue from Pillar One Amount A: country-by-country estimates “Public goods, labor supply and benefit taxation” The marginal value of public funds: a brief guide and application to tax policy Misreporting in the Norwegian business cash support scheme The determinants of the financial distress of Italian municipalities: How much is it due to inadequate resources?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1