The associations of dyadic coping strategies with caregivers' willingness to care and burden: A weekly diary study.

IF 2.5 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1177/13591053231223838

Giulia Ferraris, Pierre Gérain, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Saif Elayan, Val Morrison, Robbert Sanderman, Mariët Hagedoorn

{"title":"The associations of dyadic coping strategies with caregivers' willingness to care and burden: A weekly diary study.","authors":"Giulia Ferraris, Pierre Gérain, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Saif Elayan, Val Morrison, Robbert Sanderman, Mariët Hagedoorn","doi":"10.1177/13591053231223838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This weekly diary study investigated associations of weekly dyadic coping strategies with caregivers' willingness to care and burden. Multilevel modelling was applied to assess between- and within-person associations for 24 consecutive weeks in 955 caregivers. Greater willingness to care was reported in weeks when caregivers used more collaborative (b = 0.26, p < 0.001) and supportive (b = 0.30, p < 0.001) strategies, whereas uninvolved coping was associated with lower willingness to care (b = -0.44, p < 0.001). Using collaborative coping strategies was associated with lower weekly burden (b = -0.13, p < 0.001). A greater burden was reported in weeks when caregivers used more uninvolved (b = 0.19, p < 0.001) and controlling (b = 0.13, p < 0.001) coping strategies. A full understanding of whether caregivers' willingness to care and burden may be improved owing to weekly dyadic coping is essential for developing timely support for caregivers.","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053231223838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This weekly diary study investigated associations of weekly dyadic coping strategies with caregivers' willingness to care and burden. Multilevel modelling was applied to assess between- and within-person associations for 24 consecutive weeks in 955 caregivers. Greater willingness to care was reported in weeks when caregivers used more collaborative (b = 0.26, p < 0.001) and supportive (b = 0.30, p < 0.001) strategies, whereas uninvolved coping was associated with lower willingness to care (b = -0.44, p < 0.001). Using collaborative coping strategies was associated with lower weekly burden (b = -0.13, p < 0.001). A greater burden was reported in weeks when caregivers used more uninvolved (b = 0.19, p < 0.001) and controlling (b = 0.13, p < 0.001) coping strategies. A full understanding of whether caregivers' willingness to care and burden may be improved owing to weekly dyadic coping is essential for developing timely support for caregivers.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

照顾者的照顾意愿与负担之间的关系：每周日记研究。

这项每周日记研究调查了每周的二人应对策略与照顾者的照顾意愿和负担之间的关联。研究采用多层次建模法评估了 955 名照顾者连续 24 周的人际关系和人内关系。当照顾者使用更多协作性策略（b = 0.26，p < 0.001）和支持性策略（b = 0.30，p < 0.001）时，照顾者的照顾意愿会更高，而不参与性应对则与照顾意愿较低有关（b = -0.44，p < 0.001）。使用合作性应对策略与较低的每周负担有关（b = -0.13，p < 0.001）。当照顾者使用更多不参与性（b = 0.19，p < 0.001）和控制性（b = 0.13，p < 0.001）的应对策略时，周负担会更重。充分了解照顾者的照顾意愿和负担是否会因每周的二人应对策略而得到改善，对于为照顾者提供及时的支持至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

3.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.