Short-term mortality and palliative care use after delayed hospital discharge: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2023-004647
Aaron Jones, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Kevin Brown, Glenda Babe, Michael Hillmer, Andrew Costa, Nathan Stall, Kieran Quinn
{"title":"Short-term mortality and palliative care use after delayed hospital discharge: a population-based retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Aaron Jones, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Kevin Brown, Glenda Babe, Michael Hillmer, Andrew Costa, Nathan Stall, Kieran Quinn","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-004647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Canada, patients whose acute medical issues have been resolved but are awaiting discharge from hospital are designated as alternate level of care (ALC). We investigated short-term mortality and palliative care use following ALC designation in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of adult, acute care hospital admissions in Ontario with an ALC designation between January and December 2021. Our follow-up window was until 90 days post-ALC designation or death. Setting of discharge and death was determined using admission and discharge dates from multiple databases. We measured palliative care using physician billings, inpatient palliative care records and palliative home care records. We compared the characteristics of ALC patients by 90-day survival status and compared palliative care use across settings of discharge and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 54 839 ALC patients with a median age of 80 years. Nearly one-fifth (18.4%) of patients died within 90 days. Patients who died were older, had more comorbid conditions and were more likely to be male. Among those who died, 35.1% were never discharged from hospital and 20.3% were discharged but ultimately died in the hospital. The majority of people who died received palliative care following their ALC designation (68.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant proportion of patients experiencing delayed discharge die within 3 months, with the majority dying in hospitals despite being identified as ready to be discharged. Future research should examine the adequacy of palliative care provision for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"e2836-e2842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-004647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In Canada, patients whose acute medical issues have been resolved but are awaiting discharge from hospital are designated as alternate level of care (ALC). We investigated short-term mortality and palliative care use following ALC designation in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of adult, acute care hospital admissions in Ontario with an ALC designation between January and December 2021. Our follow-up window was until 90 days post-ALC designation or death. Setting of discharge and death was determined using admission and discharge dates from multiple databases. We measured palliative care using physician billings, inpatient palliative care records and palliative home care records. We compared the characteristics of ALC patients by 90-day survival status and compared palliative care use across settings of discharge and death.

Results: We included 54 839 ALC patients with a median age of 80 years. Nearly one-fifth (18.4%) of patients died within 90 days. Patients who died were older, had more comorbid conditions and were more likely to be male. Among those who died, 35.1% were never discharged from hospital and 20.3% were discharged but ultimately died in the hospital. The majority of people who died received palliative care following their ALC designation (68.1%).

Conclusions: A significant proportion of patients experiencing delayed discharge die within 3 months, with the majority dying in hospitals despite being identified as ready to be discharged. Future research should examine the adequacy of palliative care provision for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟出院后的短期死亡率和姑息治疗的使用情况:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
目标:在加拿大,急性医疗问题已经解决但等待出院的患者被指定为备用护理级别(ALC)。我们调查了加拿大安大略省被指定为 ALC 后的短期死亡率和姑息治疗的使用情况:我们对 2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间安大略省被指定为 ALC 的成人急症护理住院患者进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。我们的随访窗口期为ALC指定后90天或死亡。我们使用多个数据库中的入院和出院日期来确定出院和死亡时间。我们使用医生账单、住院姑息治疗记录和居家姑息治疗记录来衡量姑息治疗。我们按 90 天存活状况比较了 ALC 患者的特征,并比较了不同出院和死亡情况下姑息治疗的使用情况:我们纳入了 54 839 名 ALC 患者,中位年龄为 80 岁。近五分之一(18.4%)的患者在 90 天内死亡。死亡患者年龄较大,合并症较多,男性可能性较大。在死亡患者中,35.1%从未出院,20.3%虽已出院但最终仍死在医院。大多数死亡患者在被指定为ALC后接受了姑息治疗(68.1%):结论:很大一部分延迟出院的患者会在3个月内死亡,其中大多数人死在医院,尽管他们已被确认为可以出院。未来的研究应考察为这类人群提供的姑息关怀服务是否充分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Crisis pack prescribing in terminal haemorrhage: a national survey of specialist palliative medicine physicians. Divergence in DNACPR and resuscitation policies: institutional survey in England. End-of-life care in a major UK trauma centre. Palliative care utilisation globally by cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiac dysfunction in solid tumours: scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1