Crisis pack prescribing in terminal haemorrhage: a national survey of specialist palliative medicine physicians.

IF 2 4区医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2025-03-04 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2025-005370

Grace Kennedy, Niall Manktelow, Ita Harnett, Camilla Murtagh

{"title":"Crisis pack prescribing in terminal haemorrhage: a national survey of specialist palliative medicine physicians.","authors":"Grace Kennedy, Niall Manktelow, Ita Harnett, Camilla Murtagh","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To establish practice among senior palliative medicine physicians regarding anticipatory prescribing to manage a terminal haemorrhage.To generate a guideline informed by data collected.Methods: An electronic questionnaire was sent to palliative medicine consultants and specialist registrars in Ireland.Results: The response rate was 50%. All respondents (100%) prescribe crisis packs. The most prescribed medications were morphine and midazolam. Over 95% prescribe medication via the subcutaneous route. Regarding indications for prescribing, about two-thirds of respondents would prescribe for a patient with a head and neck malignancy. Almost two-thirds of respondents do not follow any policy or guideline. The main area of variation is in the dose prescribed for those already on a scheduled opioid and/or benzodiazepine.Conclusions: The proposed guideline is based on the expert opinion of questionnaire respondents. The recommended medications, route of prescription and broad indications for prescribing included in the guideline were based on a clear consensus. Most respondents vary the dose of crisis medication prescribed based on whether the patient is on a baseline anxiolytic/opioid. As the calculations used for dose variation were not consistent between respondents, the most reported calculation, 1/6 of 24-hour dose, is recommended in the guideline.","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To establish practice among senior palliative medicine physicians regarding anticipatory prescribing to manage a terminal haemorrhage.To generate a guideline informed by data collected.

Methods: An electronic questionnaire was sent to palliative medicine consultants and specialist registrars in Ireland.

Results: The response rate was 50%. All respondents (100%) prescribe crisis packs. The most prescribed medications were morphine and midazolam. Over 95% prescribe medication via the subcutaneous route. Regarding indications for prescribing, about two-thirds of respondents would prescribe for a patient with a head and neck malignancy. Almost two-thirds of respondents do not follow any policy or guideline. The main area of variation is in the dose prescribed for those already on a scheduled opioid and/or benzodiazepine.

Conclusions: The proposed guideline is based on the expert opinion of questionnaire respondents. The recommended medications, route of prescription and broad indications for prescribing included in the guideline were based on a clear consensus. Most respondents vary the dose of crisis medication prescribed based on whether the patient is on a baseline anxiolytic/opioid. As the calculations used for dose variation were not consistent between respondents, the most reported calculation, 1/6 of 24-hour dose, is recommended in the guideline.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

7.40%

发文量

170

期刊介绍： Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.