Investigation of PET image quality with acquisition time/bed and enhancement of lesion quantification accuracy through deep progressive learning.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING EJNMMI Physics Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1186/s40658-023-00607-x
Hongxing Yang, Shihao Chen, Ming Qi, Wen Chen, Qing Kong, Jianping Zhang, Shaoli Song
{"title":"Investigation of PET image quality with acquisition time/bed and enhancement of lesion quantification accuracy through deep progressive learning.","authors":"Hongxing Yang, Shihao Chen, Ming Qi, Wen Chen, Qing Kong, Jianping Zhang, Shaoli Song","doi":"10.1186/s40658-023-00607-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve the PET image quality by a deep progressive learning (DPL) reconstruction algorithm and evaluate the DPL performance in lesion quantification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reconstructed PET images from 48 oncological patients using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and deep progressive learning (DPL) methods. The patients were enrolled into three overlapped studies: 11 patients for image quality assessment (study 1), 34 patients for sub-centimeter lesion quantification (study 2), and 28 patients for imaging of overweight or obese individuals (study 3). In study 1, we evaluated the image quality visually based on four criteria: overall score, image sharpness, image noise, and diagnostic confidence. We also measured the image quality quantitatively using the signal-to-background ratio (SBR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-background ratio (CBR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). To evaluate the performance of the DPL algorithm in quantifying lesions, we compared the maximum standardized uptake values (SUV<sub>max</sub>), SBR, CBR, SNR and CNR of 63 sub-centimeter lesions in study 2 and 44 lesions in study 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DPL produced better PET image quality than OSEM did based on the visual evaluation methods when the acquisition time was 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 min/bed. However, no discernible differences were found between the two methods when the acquisition time was 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 min/bed. Quantitative results showed that DPL had significantly higher values of SBR, CBR, SNR, and CNR than OSEM did for each acquisition time. For sub-centimeter lesion quantification, the SUV<sub>max</sub>, SBR, CBR, SNR, and CNR of DPL were significantly enhanced, compared with OSEM. Similarly, for lesion quantification in overweight and obese patients, DPL significantly increased these parameters compared with OSEM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DPL algorithm dramatically enhanced the quality of PET images and enabled more accurate quantification of sub-centimeters lesions in patients and lesions in overweight or obese patients. This is particularly beneficial for overweight or obese patients who usually have lower image quality due to the increased attenuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10776545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00607-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To improve the PET image quality by a deep progressive learning (DPL) reconstruction algorithm and evaluate the DPL performance in lesion quantification.

Methods: We reconstructed PET images from 48 oncological patients using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and deep progressive learning (DPL) methods. The patients were enrolled into three overlapped studies: 11 patients for image quality assessment (study 1), 34 patients for sub-centimeter lesion quantification (study 2), and 28 patients for imaging of overweight or obese individuals (study 3). In study 1, we evaluated the image quality visually based on four criteria: overall score, image sharpness, image noise, and diagnostic confidence. We also measured the image quality quantitatively using the signal-to-background ratio (SBR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-background ratio (CBR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). To evaluate the performance of the DPL algorithm in quantifying lesions, we compared the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), SBR, CBR, SNR and CNR of 63 sub-centimeter lesions in study 2 and 44 lesions in study 3.

Results: DPL produced better PET image quality than OSEM did based on the visual evaluation methods when the acquisition time was 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 min/bed. However, no discernible differences were found between the two methods when the acquisition time was 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 min/bed. Quantitative results showed that DPL had significantly higher values of SBR, CBR, SNR, and CNR than OSEM did for each acquisition time. For sub-centimeter lesion quantification, the SUVmax, SBR, CBR, SNR, and CNR of DPL were significantly enhanced, compared with OSEM. Similarly, for lesion quantification in overweight and obese patients, DPL significantly increased these parameters compared with OSEM.

Conclusion: The DPL algorithm dramatically enhanced the quality of PET images and enabled more accurate quantification of sub-centimeters lesions in patients and lesions in overweight or obese patients. This is particularly beneficial for overweight or obese patients who usually have lower image quality due to the increased attenuation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究 PET 图像质量与采集时间/床位的关系,以及通过深度渐进学习提高病变量化准确性。
目的通过深度渐进学习(DPL)重建算法提高 PET 图像质量,并评估 DPL 在病变量化方面的性能:我们使用有序子集期望最大化(OSEM)和深度渐进学习(DPL)方法重建了 48 名肿瘤患者的 PET 图像。这些患者被纳入三项重叠研究:11 名患者用于图像质量评估(研究 1),34 名患者用于亚厘米病灶量化(研究 2),28 名患者用于超重或肥胖人群的成像(研究 3)。在研究 1 中,我们根据四个标准对图像质量进行了直观评估:总分、图像清晰度、图像噪声和诊断可信度。我们还使用信号-背景比(SBR)、信号-噪声比(SNR)、对比-背景比(CBR)和对比-噪声比(CNR)对图像质量进行了定量测量。为了评估 DPL 算法在量化病变方面的性能,我们比较了研究 2 中 63 个亚厘米病变和研究 3 中 44 个病变的最大标准化摄取值 (SUVmax)、SBR、CBR、信噪比和 CNR:根据目测评估方法,当采集时间为 0.5、1.0 和 1.5 分钟/床时,DPL 产生的 PET 图像质量优于 OSEM。然而,当采集时间为 2.0、2.5 和 3.0 分钟/床时,两种方法之间没有明显差异。定量结果显示,在每个采集时间段,DPL 的 SBR、CBR、SNR 和 CNR 值都明显高于 OSEM。在亚厘米病变定量方面,DPL的SUVmax、SBR、CBR、SNR和CNR均明显高于OSEM。同样,对于超重和肥胖患者的病变定量,DPL与OSEM相比明显提高了这些参数:结论:DPL 算法大大提高了 PET 图像的质量,能更准确地量化患者的亚厘米病变以及超重或肥胖患者的病变。这对超重或肥胖患者尤其有益,因为他们通常会因衰减增加而降低图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of positron emitters for theranostic applications based on small bioconjugates highlighting 43Sc, 61Cu and 45Ti. Impact of cell geometry, cellular uptake region, and tumour morphology on 225Ac and 177Lu dose distributions in prostate cancer. Optimization and application of renal depth measurement method in the cadmium-zinc-telluride‑based SPECT/CT renal dynamic imaging. How much do 68Ga-, 177Lu- and 131I-based radiopharmaceuticals contribute to the global radiation exposure of nuclear medicine staff? Comparison of the dosimetry and cell survival effect of 177Lu and 161Tb somatostatin analog radiopharmaceuticals in cancer cell clusters and micrometastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1