Post-operative pain management by nurses in an intensive care unit: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000401
Érica Brandão de Moraes, Juliane de Macedo Antunes, Maria Fernanda Muniz Ferrari, Bárbara Ventura Fontes, Renata Castro da Silva Pereira, Luciana Ogawa, Donizete Vago Daher
{"title":"Post-operative pain management by nurses in an intensive care unit: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Érica Brandão de Moraes, Juliane de Macedo Antunes, Maria Fernanda Muniz Ferrari, Bárbara Ventura Fontes, Renata Castro da Silva Pereira, Luciana Ogawa, Donizete Vago Daher","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-operative pain is the most prevalent type of acute pain. Nurses are the health care professionals who most frequently assess pain, as well as evaluating the patient's response to pain management treatment and monitoring for the occurrence of adverse events. Thus, to improve outcomes and quality of care, the interventions used by nurses should be based on best practices.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this project was to implement best practices in post-operative pain management in an intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This evidence implementation project was conducted in a hospital for the surgical treatment of orthopedic diseases and trauma. The project followed the JBI evidence implementation framework. The project used JBI PACES software as well as JBI's Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) audit and feedback tools to develop eight audit criteria for the baseline and follow-up audits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline audit showed that criteria 3 and 6 had low compliance, with few patients having documented plans and goals, and receiving multimodal analgesia in the ICU, respectively. Criteria 7 and 8, which assessed the use of opioids and follow-up by a pain specialist, revealed compliance of 60% and 50%, respectively. Criterion 3 improved from 0% to 20%. Criteria 6, 7, and 8 also improved, rising to 30%, 22.8%, and 50%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The project improved compliance with best practices in post-operative pain management. Further studies are needed to ensure the project's long-term sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post-operative pain is the most prevalent type of acute pain. Nurses are the health care professionals who most frequently assess pain, as well as evaluating the patient's response to pain management treatment and monitoring for the occurrence of adverse events. Thus, to improve outcomes and quality of care, the interventions used by nurses should be based on best practices.

Objectives: The aim of this project was to implement best practices in post-operative pain management in an intensive care unit.

Methods: This evidence implementation project was conducted in a hospital for the surgical treatment of orthopedic diseases and trauma. The project followed the JBI evidence implementation framework. The project used JBI PACES software as well as JBI's Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) audit and feedback tools to develop eight audit criteria for the baseline and follow-up audits.

Results: The baseline audit showed that criteria 3 and 6 had low compliance, with few patients having documented plans and goals, and receiving multimodal analgesia in the ICU, respectively. Criteria 7 and 8, which assessed the use of opioids and follow-up by a pain specialist, revealed compliance of 60% and 50%, respectively. Criterion 3 improved from 0% to 20%. Criteria 6, 7, and 8 also improved, rising to 30%, 22.8%, and 50%, respectively.

Conclusion: The project improved compliance with best practices in post-operative pain management. Further studies are needed to ensure the project's long-term sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护室护士的术后疼痛管理:最佳实践实施项目。
简介:术后疼痛是最常见的急性疼痛类型:术后疼痛是最常见的急性疼痛类型。护士是最常对疼痛进行评估的专业医护人员,她们还负责评估病人对疼痛控制治疗的反应并监测不良事件的发生。因此,为了提高治疗效果和护理质量,护士使用的干预措施应以最佳实践为基础:本项目旨在重症监护病房实施术后疼痛管理的最佳实践:该循证实施项目在一家骨科和创伤外科医院开展。该项目遵循 JBI 证据实施框架。该项目使用了JBI PACES软件以及JBI的 "将研究付诸实践"(GRiP)审计和反馈工具,为基线审计和后续审计制定了八项审计标准:基线审核结果表明,标准 3 和标准 6 的合规性较低,分别只有少数患者有记录在案的计划和目标,以及在重症监护室接受多模式镇痛。评估阿片类药物使用情况和疼痛专家随访情况的标准 7 和标准 8 的达标率分别为 60% 和 50%。标准 3 从 0% 提高到 20%。标准 6、7 和 8 也有所改善,分别提高到 30%、22.8% 和 50%:结论:该项目提高了术后疼痛管理最佳实践的依从性。为确保项目的长期可持续性,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Assessing the risk of postnatal depression in mothers receiving the health visiting service: a best practice implementation project. SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it. Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1