Jbi Evidence Implementation最新文献

Introduction: Prolonged sleep deprivation and poor sleep quality are common complaints among pregnant and postpartum women, and they have adverse effects on the physiological and psychological well-being of mothers antenatally and postnatally.

Objectives: The aim of this project was to improve antenatal and postnatal mothers' night-time sleep quality during hospitalization in an obstetric ward through multi-faceted interventions.

Methods: This project followed the JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare and applied the seven phases of the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework to conduct context analysis, strategy implementation, and review of practice using evidence-based audit criteria. JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and the Getting Research into Practice situational analysis tool were used to support data collection and identify barriers and strategies. Mothers' sleep quality was measured using an adapted St. Mary's Hospital Sleep Questionnaire.

Results: Baseline audit results (0%) revealed that midwives and nurses were not implementing the multi-faceted interventions to promote sleep in mothers. The results in follow-up audit 1 and follow-up audit 2 achieved compliance of 63.3% (p < 0.000), respectively. Overall, the mothers were fairly satisfied with their sleep quality, were able to sleep longer, and felt more alert when waking up in the morning.

Conclusions: There was an increase in compliance with best practices to improve mothers' sleep quality in the obstetric wards, although these results could be further improved. Mothers' perspectives of sleep promotion strategies should be explored in future projects to tailor the strategies to their needs. Sustainability plans include conducting follow-up audits and engaging ward nurses to continue implementing the multi-faceted interventions.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A307.

Introduction: People with stroke are at risk of poor oral hygiene caused by neurological deficits, which can be motor, sensory, or cognitive. Good oral hygiene has been shown to reduce adverse events and improve the patient's quality of life. Although nurses recognize the benefits of oral hygiene, evidence shows that this area of care is frequently overlooked.

Aim: This evidence implementation project aimed to improve oral hygiene in stroke patients through the application of best practices.

Methods: This project was conducted in a stroke unit in a hospital in northern Portugal. The project followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit process. Four audit criteria were used in the baseline and follow-up audits. Observation of nursing care and analysis of nursing records were used to assess current practice against best practice recommendations. Nurses were engaged in the project through brainstorming to identify barriers, co-create strategies to address the barriers, and ensure project sustainability.

Results: The baseline audit revealed low compliance with the four audit criteria. The follow-up audit showed increased compliance, with Criterion 1 improving from 0% to 100%, with all nurses receiving training on oral hygiene assessment and management. Compliance increased by 40% for Criterion 2 and 36.7% for Criteria 3 and 4, respectively.

Conclusions: The project successfully promoted compliance with best practice recommendations and increased evidence-based practice for oral hygiene in patients with stroke in a stroke unit.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A302.

Introduction and objectives: Health care providers need a high level of communication skills in dealing with pediatric patients and their carers. The objective of this project was to evaluate current practice and implement best practices promoting health care provider communication with pediatric patients and carers in a children's hospital in Tabriz, Iran.

Methods: This project used the JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare, which guided the conceptualization of evidence implementation, context analysis, project implementation, and evaluation of outcomes using evidence-based quality indicators. An audit and feedback strategy was adopted to measure baseline compliance with best practices, develop strategies to address areas of non-compliance, and conduct a final audit to measure any changes in compliance. Four criteria were developed for the baseline and follow-up audits. Criteria 1 and 2 were evaluated using a sample of 30 health care providers, while Criteria 3 and 4 were evaluated using a sample of 80 pediatric patients and carers.

Results: All four criteria improved at the end of the project. Criterion 1 (health care staff receive communication skills training) had the highest mean score at baseline and follow-up (63% and 83%, respectively). Criterion 2 (implementation of local strategies by health care organizations) increased from 45% to 55%. However, this rate of improvement was the lowest of all the criteria. Criterion 3 (pediatric patients receive relevant education) improved from low to moderate, rising from 18% to 49%. A more significant improvement was noted for Criterion 4 (parents receive relevant education), which rose from 19% to 56%.

Conclusions: The strategies implemented in this project successfully improved health care provider communication with pediatric patients and their carers. To ensure project sustainability, repeat audits will be conducted after 3, 6, and 12 months.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A199.

Introduction: Peripherally-inserted venous catheters (PIVC) are essential for cancer patients to receive treatment. Phlebitis is a major complication of PIVC. Currently, nurses' assessment of phlebitis mainly involves visual inspection. However, the latest literature suggests palpation for tenderness to promote the early detection of phlebitis.

Objectives: This project evaluated the effectiveness of a bundle approach to increase nurses' compliance with PIVC site assessment to promote early detection of phlebitis (grade 2 and above).

Methods: The JBI Evidence Implementation Framework was used to conduct this project in a 28-bed hematology-oncology ward in a Singapore hospital. The bundle approach used in this project consisted of a training presentation, medical mannequin, and phlebitis scale card. The rate of nurses' compliance with best practice for PIVC site assessment was measured at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation. The incidence of phlebitis was monitored up until 12 months post-implementation.

Results: Baseline data indicated that only 18.75% (3 out of 16) nurses palpated for tenderness when assessing for phlebitis. Data at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation reported sustained high compliance rates of 85.71% (24 out of 28) and 89.29% (25 out of 28), respectively. Late detection of phlebitis was reduced by 66% (from three cases to one case) at 6 months post-implementation, and no patients required invasive interventions.

Conclusions: The bundle approach used in this project facilitated early detection of phlebitis following the inclusion of palpation into nurses' assessment for phlebitis.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A204.

Introduction and objectives: Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease that destroys insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. Education is the cornerstone of effective diabetes care. In this implementation project, we aimed to improve compliance with best practices regarding type 1 diabetes educational interventions for adult hospitalized patients.

Methods: This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. A baseline audit was conducted involving 20 nurses and 20 type 1 diabetes patients who received regular educational measures. Areas of non-compliance were identified and an improvement strategy was implemented. A follow-up audit was then conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the improvement strategy. The project was conducted in Poland in 2021 in a tertiary referral unit that specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes.

Results: Substantial improvements were noted for all audit criteria after the implementation of strategies to address areas of non-compliance. Use of the education program improved from 0% to 100%. Compliance regarding patients receiving handouts and personalization of the program increased to 100%. We observed a significant improvement from 0% to 80% in the structuring of the program content.

Conclusions: This project successfully improved the quality of education provided for type 1 diabetes patients in all relevant areas. We devised an education program, covering important aspects of diabetes education, with the patients reporting increased satisfaction with the personalized educational measures during their hospital stay.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A215.

Introduction: Miltefosine is a new drug that was recently approved for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) by the Brazilian health system. It has a teratogenic potential and requires follow-up of patients undergoing treatment. Improving compliance with best practices is essential to ensure the safe and appropriate use of this drug.

Objective: This project aimed to implement best practices for the safe and appropriate use of miltefosine in the treatment of TL in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Methods: This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Five best practice criteria were established based on the best available evidence. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practice against best practice. Barriers to best practice were then identified and a follow-up audit was conducted to evaluate changes after the implementation of improvement strategies. Two sites were analyzed: a leishmaniasis reference service in Belo Horizonte, the capital of Minas Gerais, and 28 regional offices.

Results: The baseline audit evaluated data from 197 miltefosine requests distributed across 13 regional sites. All requests from the reference service were compliant (100%). This is in contrast to the 60% compliance rate at the regional offices. The improvement strategies included intensifying direct communication with the regional health professionals, which increased the average compliance rate to 79.5%, 6 months after the interventions were introduced.

Conclusion: This best practice implementation project effectively increased the compliance rate for the audited procedures. Communication from the reference site with the regional health professionals successfully increased compliance with best practices and promoted the safe and appropriate use of miltefosine. These strategies should analyzed and applied to improve other programs.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A184.

Introduction: Evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) plays a vital role in public health practice. Canada has invested in support for evidence-informed approaches in public health. Despite growing expectations for EIDM, evidence integration has not been thoroughly evaluated.

Objective: This study explores EIDM within Canadian public health organizations before the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective is to explore how EIDM in public health was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected and analyzed from interviews with public health professionals across Canada.

Results: From interviews with 20 participants in four Canadian provinces and one territory, all participants noted that EIDM was valued, but there was considerable variation in implementation. Participants reported differences in consistency of evidence use, resources available at their public health organizations to support EIDM, and staff knowledge and skills in EIDM. Leadership emerged as a strong influencer of EIDM; however, leadership investment in EIDM varied. Changes in evidence use during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed an urgency for decision-making amidst an influx of evidence and reallocated staff roles.

Conclusions: Despite gains in the recognized value of EIDM, gaps remain in the integration of evidence into decision-making and adequate resource investment to support EIDM. Time, resources, and skills to adapt processes and implement EIDM are needed for public health organizations in Canada to fully integrate EIDM into all aspects of public health decision-making.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A249.

Introduction: Stroke patients frequently experience debilitating deficits, and some receive a. terminal diagnosis. Palliative care services are introduced to prioritize care, with the goal of improving quality of life. However, palliative care communication (PCC) is often delayed or used inefficiently with stroke patients.

Objectives: This project aimed to promote PCC evidence-based practices (EBPs) with stroke patients.

Methods: This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework to improve compliance with PCC EBPs with stroke patients in a medical center in Mississippi, USA. Four EBPs were identified from a JBI evidence summary and used as audit criteria. A baseline audit was conducted to measure compliance of current practice with best practice. Barriers to EBPs were identified, improvement strategies were implemented, and a follow-up audit was conducted to determine compliance changes.

Results: The baseline audit revealed 53% to 80% compliance with the four EBPs. Barriers to EBPs included lack of health care professionals' knowledge regarding EBPs; lack of PCC, miscommunication, or delayed PCC with patients regarding hospitalization timeline and quality of life; and no standardized documentation or location for PCC within the electronic health record. Improvement strategies included a PCC education program for health care professionals and a concise statement and validation checkbox to the "progress note" in the electronic health record to promote daily PCC with patients. The follow-up audit revealed 20% to 34% compliance rate improvement with EBPs.

Conclusions: Annual PCC training should be conducted for health care professionals. Implementing PCC through a multidisciplinary approach can promote more meaningful discussion and efficient decision-making, prioritizing patients' quality of life.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A174.

Introduction: Appropriate malignant fungating wound (MFW) care is challenging for oncology nurses, leading to increased stress, compromised care quality, and poor patient outcomes.

Objective: This study aimed to address best practice barriers and develop evidence-based guidelines for MFW care.

Methods: This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which follows a seven-phase process. Both nurses' skills and patient charts were audited to determine compliance with best practices for comprehensive MFW assessment, wound photo records, use of validated wound assessment tools, appropriate wound care, and patient pain and satisfaction. Bandura's social learning theory was used to guide the development of an online education program and an objective structured clinical examination for skill improvement to prompt behavior change in nurses. A follow-up audit was conducted to measure improvements in knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy among nurses to validate the effectiveness of the intervention.

Results: The project resulted in improvements in all four evidence-based practice criteria: (1) comprehensive MFW assessments increased from 27% to 98%; (2) the inclusion of wound photos in medical records increased from 50% to 100%; (3) use of a validated wound assessment tool increased from 0% to 100%; and (4) appropriate interventions to manage wounds and maintain patients' quality of life increased from 50% to 90%.

Conclusions: The project integrated a flexible education program, multidisciplinary collaboration, and leadership support to empower nurses to effectively manage MFWs. In addition, Bandura's social learning theory was used to influence nurses' behavior and bring about sustainable changes to organizational culture and practices.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A205.