Application of Hybrid DeepLearning Architectures for Identification of Individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Based on EEG Data.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1177/15500594231222980
Shams Farhad, Sinem Zeynep Metin, Çağlar Uyulan, Sahar Taghi Zadeh Makouei, Barış Metin, Türker Tekin Ergüzel, Nevzat Tarhan
{"title":"Application of Hybrid DeepLearning Architectures for Identification of Individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Based on EEG Data.","authors":"Shams Farhad, Sinem Zeynep Metin, Çağlar Uyulan, Sahar Taghi Zadeh Makouei, Barış Metin, Türker Tekin Ergüzel, Nevzat Tarhan","doi":"10.1177/15500594231222980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly common psychiatric disorder. The symptoms of this condition overlap and co-occur with those of other psychiatric illnesses, making diagnosis difficult. The availability of biomarkers could be useful for aiding in diagnosis, although prior neuroimaging studies were unable to provide such biomarkers. <b>Method:</b> In this study, patients with OCD were classified from healthy controls using 2 different hybrid deep learning models: one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1DCNN) together with long-short term memory (LSTM) and gradient recurrent units (GRU), respectively. <b>Results:</b> Both models exhibited exceptional classification accuracies in cross-validation and external validation phases. The mean classification accuracies in the cross-validation stage were 90.88% and 85.91% for the 1DCNN-LSTM and 1DCNN-GRU models, respectively. The inferior frontal, temporal, and occipital electrodes were predominant in providing discriminative features. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings underscore the potential of hybrid deep learning architectures utilizing EEG data to effectively differentiate patients with OCD from healthy controls. This promising approach holds implications for advancing clinical decision-making by offering valuable insights into diagnostic markers for OCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594231222980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly common psychiatric disorder. The symptoms of this condition overlap and co-occur with those of other psychiatric illnesses, making diagnosis difficult. The availability of biomarkers could be useful for aiding in diagnosis, although prior neuroimaging studies were unable to provide such biomarkers. Method: In this study, patients with OCD were classified from healthy controls using 2 different hybrid deep learning models: one-dimensional convolutional neural networks (1DCNN) together with long-short term memory (LSTM) and gradient recurrent units (GRU), respectively. Results: Both models exhibited exceptional classification accuracies in cross-validation and external validation phases. The mean classification accuracies in the cross-validation stage were 90.88% and 85.91% for the 1DCNN-LSTM and 1DCNN-GRU models, respectively. The inferior frontal, temporal, and occipital electrodes were predominant in providing discriminative features. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the potential of hybrid deep learning architectures utilizing EEG data to effectively differentiate patients with OCD from healthy controls. This promising approach holds implications for advancing clinical decision-making by offering valuable insights into diagnostic markers for OCD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于脑电图数据,应用混合深度学习架构识别强迫症患者。
目的:强迫症(OCD)是一种非常常见的精神疾病。强迫症的症状与其他精神疾病的症状重叠或并发,因此诊断十分困难。尽管之前的神经影像学研究无法提供此类生物标志物,但生物标志物的存在可能有助于诊断。研究方法本研究使用两种不同的混合深度学习模型:一维卷积神经网络(1DCNN)与长短期记忆(LSTM)和梯度递归单元(GRU),将强迫症患者从健康对照组中分类。结果两个模型在交叉验证和外部验证阶段都表现出了卓越的分类准确性。1DCNN-LSTM 模型和 1DCNN-GRU 模型在交叉验证阶段的平均分类准确率分别为 90.88% 和 85.91%。额叶下部、颞叶和枕叶电极在提供分辨特征方面占主导地位。结论我们的研究结果凸显了混合深度学习架构利用脑电图数据有效区分强迫症患者和健康对照组的潜力。这种有前途的方法为强迫症的诊断标记提供了有价值的见解,对推进临床决策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mismatch Negativity as an Index of Auditory Short-Term Plasticity: Associations with Cortisol, Inflammation, and Gray Matter Volume in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis. Early Impairment of Face Perception in Post-Stroke Depression: An ERP Study. Electrocortical Profiles in Relation to Childhood Adversity and Depression Severity: A Preliminary Report. From the Laboratory to the Real-World: The Role of Mismatch Negativity in Psychosis. Speech Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in Schizophrenia with Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1