Levels and drivers of burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic among a diverse group of resident physicians.

Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2024.2303974
Brenna Briles, Alyssa Kahl, James Anaissie, Lindsay Brettmann, Ujval Pathak, Kristen A Staggers, Shreeya Popat, Anoop Agrawal, Stacey Rose, Jennifer Taylor
{"title":"Levels and drivers of burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic among a diverse group of resident physicians.","authors":"Brenna Briles, Alyssa Kahl, James Anaissie, Lindsay Brettmann, Ujval Pathak, Kristen A Staggers, Shreeya Popat, Anoop Agrawal, Stacey Rose, Jennifer Taylor","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2303974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence has shown significant impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on physicians. We hypothesized that these effects would impact surgical and non-surgical resident education differently, with non-surgical specialties being more heavily impacted by frontline work and surgical specialties losing elective cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined well-being and burnout among resident physicians in surgical and non-surgical specialties during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic using the Mayo Physician Well-Being Index (WBI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completed surveys were received from 110 residents, 55% of whom were in a surgical training program. 35% of respondents were identified as 'at risk' for burnout. Increased demands from work (adj. OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.50, 9.59, <i>p</i> = 0.005) was associated with an increased likelihood for being 'at risk' compared to those without increased demands. Odds of having increased stress level were higher amongst residents with fear/anxiety of the unknown (adj. OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.63, 10.90, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and more demands outside work (adj. OR 10.54, 95% CI 2.63, 42.16, <i>p</i> = 0.001) but lower amongst residents with more time for studying (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09, 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Risk for burnout was not significantly different between surgical and non-surgical specialties when adjusting for increased demands from work (adj. OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.60, 3.37, <i>p</i> = 0.0.418).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceived effects of the COVID-19 pandemic upon residents' educational experience was mixed: reduced clinical volume had a negative impact, while increased time for study was perceived favorably. These findings suggest potential strategies and targets to mitigate the stress and burnout of a future crisis, whether large or small, among surgical and non-surgical trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2303974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence has shown significant impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on physicians. We hypothesized that these effects would impact surgical and non-surgical resident education differently, with non-surgical specialties being more heavily impacted by frontline work and surgical specialties losing elective cases.

Methods: We examined well-being and burnout among resident physicians in surgical and non-surgical specialties during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic using the Mayo Physician Well-Being Index (WBI).

Results: Completed surveys were received from 110 residents, 55% of whom were in a surgical training program. 35% of respondents were identified as 'at risk' for burnout. Increased demands from work (adj. OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.50, 9.59, p = 0.005) was associated with an increased likelihood for being 'at risk' compared to those without increased demands. Odds of having increased stress level were higher amongst residents with fear/anxiety of the unknown (adj. OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.63, 10.90, p = 0.003) and more demands outside work (adj. OR 10.54, 95% CI 2.63, 42.16, p = 0.001) but lower amongst residents with more time for studying (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09, 0.64, p = 0.005). Risk for burnout was not significantly different between surgical and non-surgical specialties when adjusting for increased demands from work (adj. OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.60, 3.37, p = 0.0.418).

Conclusion: Perceived effects of the COVID-19 pandemic upon residents' educational experience was mixed: reduced clinical volume had a negative impact, while increased time for study was perceived favorably. These findings suggest potential strategies and targets to mitigate the stress and burnout of a future crisis, whether large or small, among surgical and non-surgical trainees.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同住院医生群体在 COVID-19 大流行期间的职业倦怠程度和驱动因素。
目标:有证据表明,COVID-19 大流行对医生产生了重大影响。我们假设这些影响会对外科和非外科住院医师教育产生不同的影响,非外科专业受一线工作的影响更大,而外科专业则会失去选修病例:我们使用梅奥医生幸福指数(WBI)调查了在 COVID-19 大流行高峰期外科和非外科专业住院医师的幸福感和职业倦怠:结果:共收到 110 名住院医师填写的调查问卷,其中 55% 接受的是外科培训项目。35%的受访者被确定为有倦怠 "风险"。与没有增加工作要求的人相比,工作要求增加(adj. OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.50, 9.59, p = 0.005)与 "处于危险中 "的可能性增加有关。对未知事物感到恐惧/焦虑(adj. OR 4.21,95% CI 1.63,10.90,p = 0.003)和工作外要求较多(adj. OR 10.54,95% CI 2.63,42.16,p = 0.001)的住院医师压力水平增加的几率较高,但学习时间较多的住院医师压力水平较低(adj. OR 0.23,95% CI 0.09,0.64,p = 0.005)。在调整工作要求增加的因素后,外科和非外科专业的倦怠风险没有明显差异(adj. OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.60, 3.37, p = 0.0.418):COVID-19大流行对住院医师教育经历的影响有好有坏:临床工作量的减少产生了负面影响,而学习时间的增加则被认为是有利的。这些发现提出了一些潜在的策略和目标,以减轻未来无论规模大小的危机给外科和非外科学员带来的压力和倦怠感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The triglyceride-glucose index as an indicator of latent atherogenicity of the plasma lipid profile in healthy men with normolipidaemia. Pentoxifylline improves anemia through its novel effect on hypoxia-inducible factor-2 alpha in hemodialysis patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The masters athlete and use of antihypertensive medications. Evaluating cardiac electrophysiological markers for predicting arrhythmic risk in hypothyroid patients. SGLT2 inhibitors across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1