Kimberly A. Muellers , Katerina Andreadis , Rahma S. Mkuu , Jenny J. Lin , Carol R. Horowitz , Rainu Kaushal , Jessica S. Ancker
{"title":"Telemedicine decision-making in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Balancing patient agency and provider expertise","authors":"Kimberly A. Muellers , Katerina Andreadis , Rahma S. Mkuu , Jenny J. Lin , Carol R. Horowitz , Rainu Kaushal , Jessica S. Ancker","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated the expansion of telemedicine use worldwide, introducing a new dimension of healthcare decision-making – choosing a visit format – not previously experienced by most patients or providers. To date, the pandemic's impact on decisions about using telemedicine versus in-person visits in primary care has not been fully explored. The purpose of this study was to examine patient and provider accounts of decision-making about the choice between telemedicine and in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Primary care providers and patients were recruited from four healthcare systems across three states in the United States. Participants completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences using telemedicine for primary care during the pandemic. Data pertaining to decision-making about telemedicine were examined as a secondary analysis using interpretive description.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one providers and 65 patients completed interviews. Patients’ ability to choose their own visit format influenced their level of satisfaction with telemedicine care, while providers expressed concern about leaving visit format entirely up to their patients. Patients and providers generally agreed that telemedicine was well-suited for routine follow-ups, reviewing results, and medication management. However, in cases of urgent health problems, patients and providers differed in their criteria for determining what visit format is most appropriate but agreed that telemedicine could be a useful tool for “quick fixes” and for fast and effective triage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Primary care patients and providers emphasized the importance of agency during care delivery and shared opportunities for effective triage via telemedicine. Further research should focus on developing tools to support shared healthcare decisions regarding telemedicine use under changing healthcare conditions, particularly for urgent health questions.</p></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has increased telemedicine use around the world. This study looked at patient and provider decisions about using telemedicine versus in-person care during the pandemic. We asked 21 primary care providers and 65 patients from four healthcare systems across three U.S. states about their experiences using telemedicine during the pandemic. Patients were more satisfied if they were able to choose whether to have an in-person or video visit, while providers worried that allowing patients to choose the visit format could get in the way of care when patients need physical exams or laboratory testing. Patients and providers gave different reasons for choosing a visit format, but both agreed that telemedicine was useful for “quick fixes” and making decisions together in emergencies. Healthcare systems should create tools to help patients and providers decide when to use telemedicine, especially when managing urgent health issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100839"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated the expansion of telemedicine use worldwide, introducing a new dimension of healthcare decision-making – choosing a visit format – not previously experienced by most patients or providers. To date, the pandemic's impact on decisions about using telemedicine versus in-person visits in primary care has not been fully explored. The purpose of this study was to examine patient and provider accounts of decision-making about the choice between telemedicine and in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
Primary care providers and patients were recruited from four healthcare systems across three states in the United States. Participants completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences using telemedicine for primary care during the pandemic. Data pertaining to decision-making about telemedicine were examined as a secondary analysis using interpretive description.
Results
Twenty-one providers and 65 patients completed interviews. Patients’ ability to choose their own visit format influenced their level of satisfaction with telemedicine care, while providers expressed concern about leaving visit format entirely up to their patients. Patients and providers generally agreed that telemedicine was well-suited for routine follow-ups, reviewing results, and medication management. However, in cases of urgent health problems, patients and providers differed in their criteria for determining what visit format is most appropriate but agreed that telemedicine could be a useful tool for “quick fixes” and for fast and effective triage.
Conclusions
Primary care patients and providers emphasized the importance of agency during care delivery and shared opportunities for effective triage via telemedicine. Further research should focus on developing tools to support shared healthcare decisions regarding telemedicine use under changing healthcare conditions, particularly for urgent health questions.
Public Interest Summary
The COVID-19 pandemic has increased telemedicine use around the world. This study looked at patient and provider decisions about using telemedicine versus in-person care during the pandemic. We asked 21 primary care providers and 65 patients from four healthcare systems across three U.S. states about their experiences using telemedicine during the pandemic. Patients were more satisfied if they were able to choose whether to have an in-person or video visit, while providers worried that allowing patients to choose the visit format could get in the way of care when patients need physical exams or laboratory testing. Patients and providers gave different reasons for choosing a visit format, but both agreed that telemedicine was useful for “quick fixes” and making decisions together in emergencies. Healthcare systems should create tools to help patients and providers decide when to use telemedicine, especially when managing urgent health issues.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics