Economic assessment of clean hydrogen production from fossil fuels in the intermountain-west region, USA

Fangxuan Chen , Bailian Chen , Zhiwei Ma , Mohamed Mehana
{"title":"Economic assessment of clean hydrogen production from fossil fuels in the intermountain-west region, USA","authors":"Fangxuan Chen ,&nbsp;Bailian Chen ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Ma ,&nbsp;Mohamed Mehana","doi":"10.1016/j.rset.2024.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transition from fossil fuels to carbon-neutral energy sources is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and combat climate change. Hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>) provides a promising path to harness fossil fuels to reduce emissions in sectors such as transportation. However, regional economic analyses of various H<sub>2</sub> production techniques are still lacking. We selected a well-known fossil fuel-exporting region, the USA's Intermountain-West (I-WEST), to analyze the carbon intensity of H<sub>2</sub> production and demonstrate regional tradeoffs. Currently, 78 % of global H<sub>2</sub> production comes from natural gas and coal. Therefore, we considered steam methane reforming (SMR), surface coal gasification (SCG) and underground coal gasification (UCG) as H<sub>2</sub> production methods in this work. We developed the cost estimation frameworks of SMR, SCG and UCG with and without carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS). In addition, we identified optimal sites for H<sub>2</sub> hubs by considering the proximity to energy sources, energy markets, storage sites and CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration sites. We included new production tax credits (PTCs) in the cost estimation to quantify the economic benefit of CCUS. Our results suggest that the UCG has the lowest levelized cost of H<sub>2</sub> production due to the elimination of coal production cost. H<sub>2</sub> production using the SMR process with 99 % carbon capture is profitable when the PTCs are considered. We also analyzed carbon utilization opportunities where CO<sub>2</sub> conversion to formic acid is a promising profitable option. This work quantifies the potential of H<sub>2</sub> production from fossil fuels in the I-WEST region, a key parameter for designing energy transition pathways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101071,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100077"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X24000011/pdfft?md5=d4dd62ab26483696cb2f582ab72da1d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2667095X24000011-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X24000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transition from fossil fuels to carbon-neutral energy sources is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and combat climate change. Hydrogen (H2) provides a promising path to harness fossil fuels to reduce emissions in sectors such as transportation. However, regional economic analyses of various H2 production techniques are still lacking. We selected a well-known fossil fuel-exporting region, the USA's Intermountain-West (I-WEST), to analyze the carbon intensity of H2 production and demonstrate regional tradeoffs. Currently, 78 % of global H2 production comes from natural gas and coal. Therefore, we considered steam methane reforming (SMR), surface coal gasification (SCG) and underground coal gasification (UCG) as H2 production methods in this work. We developed the cost estimation frameworks of SMR, SCG and UCG with and without carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS). In addition, we identified optimal sites for H2 hubs by considering the proximity to energy sources, energy markets, storage sites and CO2 sequestration sites. We included new production tax credits (PTCs) in the cost estimation to quantify the economic benefit of CCUS. Our results suggest that the UCG has the lowest levelized cost of H2 production due to the elimination of coal production cost. H2 production using the SMR process with 99 % carbon capture is profitable when the PTCs are considered. We also analyzed carbon utilization opportunities where CO2 conversion to formic acid is a promising profitable option. This work quantifies the potential of H2 production from fossil fuels in the I-WEST region, a key parameter for designing energy transition pathways.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国西部山区化石燃料清洁制氢的经济评估
为了减少温室气体(GHG)排放和应对气候变化,有必要从化石燃料过渡到碳中性能源。氢气(H2)为利用化石燃料减少交通等部门的排放提供了一条前景广阔的道路。然而,目前仍缺乏对各种 H2 生产技术的区域经济分析。我们选择了一个著名的化石燃料出口地区--美国西部山区(I-WEST)来分析 H2 生产的碳强度,并展示地区间的权衡。目前,全球 78% 的 H2 产量来自天然气和煤炭。因此,我们将蒸汽甲烷转化(SMR)、地面煤气化(SCG)和地下煤气化(UCG)作为本研究的 H2 生产方法。我们制定了蒸汽甲烷转化(SMR)、地面煤气化(SCG)和地下煤气化(UCG)(含或不含碳捕集、利用和封存(CCUS))的成本估算框架。此外,我们还考虑了与能源、能源市场、储存地点和二氧化碳封存地点的距离,从而确定了最佳的 H2 中心地点。我们在成本估算中纳入了新的生产税抵免(PTC),以量化 CCUS 的经济效益。我们的结果表明,由于省去了煤炭生产成本,UCG 生产 H2 的平准化成本最低。考虑到 PTCs,使用 SMR 工艺生产 H2(碳捕集率为 99%)是有利可图的。我们还分析了碳利用的机会,其中二氧化碳转化为甲酸是一个很有前景的盈利方案。这项工作量化了 I-WEST 地区利用化石燃料生产 H2 的潜力,这是设计能源转型途径的一个关键参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatial heterogeneity in deployment and upscaling of wind power in Swedish municipalities Corrigendum to “Is there a case for a coal moratorium in Indonesia? Power sector optimization modeling of low-carbon strategies” [Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition (2024) 100074] Driving sustainable energy transition: Understanding residential rooftop solar photovoltaic adoption in Malaysia through a behavioural analysis Replacing fossil fuel-based power plants with renewables to meet Iran's environmental commitments in the electricity sector Just energy transition in coal regions: Innovative framework for assessing territorial just transition plans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1