Proof-of-principle study using Saccharomyces cerevisiae for universal screening test for cancer through ultrasound-based size distinction of circulating tumor cell clusters

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Biosciences Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s12038-023-00399-3
Saksham Rajan Saksena, Sandeep Kumar Rajan
{"title":"Proof-of-principle study using Saccharomyces cerevisiae for universal screening test for cancer through ultrasound-based size distinction of circulating tumor cell clusters","authors":"Saksham Rajan Saksena, Sandeep Kumar Rajan","doi":"10.1007/s12038-023-00399-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Screening strategies for cancer, the second largest cause of deaths, exist, but are invasive, cumbersome, and expensive. Many cancers lack viable screening modalities all together. Circulating tumor cell clusters (CTCCs) are seen during early stages of cancer and are larger than normal blood cells. Discrimination of such differential sizes by real-time ultrasound scanning of a blood vessel offers an attractive universal screening tool for cancer. Yeast colonies were grown to different sizes mimicking CTCCs and normal blood cells, using sugar and starch to incubate and sodium fluoride to arrest growth after specified times. They were circulated using syringes and an infusion pump through a wall-less ultrasound phantom, made using agar (mimicking human soft tissue), and Doppler ultrasound was performed, with screenshots taken. Key characteristics of particles of interest were identified. Ultrasound data were processed and used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN). Six models with binary classification were tested. Doppler signals of CTCC surrogates could be visually distinguished from normal cells and normal saline, proving the principle of ultrasound size discrimination of CTCCs. The most accurate machine learning model yielded 98.35% accuracy in the prediction of CTCCs, exceeding human evaluation accuracy. Thus, machine learning could help automate and improve detection of cancer by screening for CTCCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosciences","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-023-00399-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Screening strategies for cancer, the second largest cause of deaths, exist, but are invasive, cumbersome, and expensive. Many cancers lack viable screening modalities all together. Circulating tumor cell clusters (CTCCs) are seen during early stages of cancer and are larger than normal blood cells. Discrimination of such differential sizes by real-time ultrasound scanning of a blood vessel offers an attractive universal screening tool for cancer. Yeast colonies were grown to different sizes mimicking CTCCs and normal blood cells, using sugar and starch to incubate and sodium fluoride to arrest growth after specified times. They were circulated using syringes and an infusion pump through a wall-less ultrasound phantom, made using agar (mimicking human soft tissue), and Doppler ultrasound was performed, with screenshots taken. Key characteristics of particles of interest were identified. Ultrasound data were processed and used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN). Six models with binary classification were tested. Doppler signals of CTCC surrogates could be visually distinguished from normal cells and normal saline, proving the principle of ultrasound size discrimination of CTCCs. The most accurate machine learning model yielded 98.35% accuracy in the prediction of CTCCs, exceeding human evaluation accuracy. Thus, machine learning could help automate and improve detection of cancer by screening for CTCCs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过超声波区分循环肿瘤细胞簇的大小,利用酿酒酵母进行癌症通用筛查试验的原理验证研究
癌症是导致死亡的第二大原因,目前已有针对癌症的筛查策略,但这些策略具有侵入性、繁琐且昂贵。许多癌症都缺乏可行的筛查方法。循环肿瘤细胞簇(CTCC)出现在癌症的早期阶段,比正常血细胞大。通过对血管进行实时超声扫描来分辨这种不同大小的肿瘤细胞团,是一种极具吸引力的通用癌症筛查工具。使用糖和淀粉培养酵母菌落,使其模仿 CTCC 和正常血细胞的不同大小,并在指定时间后使用氟化钠抑制生长。使用注射器和输液泵将酵母菌落通过用琼脂(模拟人体软组织)制作的无壁超声模型,然后进行多普勒超声检查并截图。确定了感兴趣颗粒的主要特征。超声数据经过处理后,用于训练卷积神经网络(CNN)。测试了六种二元分类模型。CTCC替代物的多普勒信号可以直观地与正常细胞和正常生理盐水区分开来,证明了CTCC超声大小分辨原理。最准确的机器学习模型预测 CTCC 的准确率为 98.35%,超过了人工评估的准确率。因此,通过筛查 CTCC,机器学习可帮助实现癌症检测的自动化和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biosciences
Journal of Biosciences 生物-生物学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biosciences is a quarterly journal published by the Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore. It covers all areas of Biology and is the premier journal in the country within its scope. It is indexed in Current Contents and other standard Biological and Medical databases. The Journal of Biosciences began in 1934 as the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences (Section B). This continued until 1978 when it was split into three parts : Proceedings-Animal Sciences, Proceedings-Plant Sciences and Proceedings-Experimental Biology. Proceedings-Experimental Biology was renamed Journal of Biosciences in 1979; and in 1991, Proceedings-Animal Sciences and Proceedings-Plant Sciences merged with it.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of Quercus suber L. acorns in natural and semi-natural stands: Morphology characterization, insect attacks, and chemical composition Phosphorylation mapping of laminin γ1-chain: Kinases, functional interaction sequences, and phosphorylation-interfering cancer mutations IRF9 and STAT1 as biomarkers involved in T-cell immunity in atherosclerosis Wisdom of (molecular) crowds: How a snake’s temperature-sensing superpower separates information from misinformation CDCA: Community detection in RNA-seq data using centrality-based approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1