Long-term efficacy of fuel reduction and restoration treatments in Northern Rockies dry forests

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1002/eap.2940
Sharon M. Hood, Justin S. Crotteau, Cory C. Cleveland
{"title":"Long-term efficacy of fuel reduction and restoration treatments in Northern Rockies dry forests","authors":"Sharon M. Hood,&nbsp;Justin S. Crotteau,&nbsp;Cory C. Cleveland","doi":"10.1002/eap.2940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fuel and restoration treatments seeking to mitigate the likelihood of uncharacteristic high-severity wildfires in forests with historically frequent, low-severity fire regimes are increasingly common, but long-term treatment effects on fuels, aboveground carbon, plant community structure, ecosystem resilience, and other ecosystem attributes are understudied. We present 20-year responses to thinning and prescribed burning treatments commonly used in dry, low-elevation forests of the western United States from a long-term study site in the Northern Rockies that is part of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study. We provide a comprehensive synthesis of short-term (&lt;4 years) and mid-term (&lt;14 years) results from previous findings. We then place these results in the context of a mountain pine beetle (MPB; <i>Dendroctonus ponderosae</i>) outbreak that impacted the site 5–10 years post-treatment and describe 20-year responses to assess the longevity of restoration and fuel reduction treatments in light of the MPB outbreak. Thinning treatments had persistently lower forest density and higher tree growth, but effects were more pronounced when thinning was combined with prescribed fire. The thinning+prescribed fire treatment had the additional benefit of maintaining the highest proportion of ponderosa pine (<i>Pinus ponderosa</i>) for overstory and regeneration. No differences in understory native plant cover and richness or exotic species cover remained after 20 years, but exotic species richness, while low relative to native species, was still higher in the thinning+prescribed fire treatment than the control. Aboveground live carbon stocks in thinning treatments recovered to near control and prescribed fire treatment levels by 20 years. The prescribed fire treatment and control had higher fuel loads than thinning treatments due to interactions with the MPB outbreak. The MPB-induced changes to forest structure and fuels increased the fire hazard 20 years post-treatment in the control and prescribed fire treatment. Should a wildfire occur now, the thinning+prescribed fire treatment would likely have the lowest intensity fire and highest tree survival and stable carbon stocks. Our findings show broad support that thinning and prescribed fire increase ponderosa pine forest resilience to both wildfire and bark beetles for up to 20 years, but efficacy is waning and additional fuel treatments are needed to maintain resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.2940","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fuel and restoration treatments seeking to mitigate the likelihood of uncharacteristic high-severity wildfires in forests with historically frequent, low-severity fire regimes are increasingly common, but long-term treatment effects on fuels, aboveground carbon, plant community structure, ecosystem resilience, and other ecosystem attributes are understudied. We present 20-year responses to thinning and prescribed burning treatments commonly used in dry, low-elevation forests of the western United States from a long-term study site in the Northern Rockies that is part of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study. We provide a comprehensive synthesis of short-term (<4 years) and mid-term (<14 years) results from previous findings. We then place these results in the context of a mountain pine beetle (MPB; Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreak that impacted the site 5–10 years post-treatment and describe 20-year responses to assess the longevity of restoration and fuel reduction treatments in light of the MPB outbreak. Thinning treatments had persistently lower forest density and higher tree growth, but effects were more pronounced when thinning was combined with prescribed fire. The thinning+prescribed fire treatment had the additional benefit of maintaining the highest proportion of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) for overstory and regeneration. No differences in understory native plant cover and richness or exotic species cover remained after 20 years, but exotic species richness, while low relative to native species, was still higher in the thinning+prescribed fire treatment than the control. Aboveground live carbon stocks in thinning treatments recovered to near control and prescribed fire treatment levels by 20 years. The prescribed fire treatment and control had higher fuel loads than thinning treatments due to interactions with the MPB outbreak. The MPB-induced changes to forest structure and fuels increased the fire hazard 20 years post-treatment in the control and prescribed fire treatment. Should a wildfire occur now, the thinning+prescribed fire treatment would likely have the lowest intensity fire and highest tree survival and stable carbon stocks. Our findings show broad support that thinning and prescribed fire increase ponderosa pine forest resilience to both wildfire and bark beetles for up to 20 years, but efficacy is waning and additional fuel treatments are needed to maintain resilience.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北落基山脉干旱森林减少燃料和恢复处理的长期功效
在历史上火灾频发、火险等级较低的森林中,旨在减轻非典型高火险野火发生可能性的燃料和恢复处理方法越来越常见,但对燃料、地上碳、植物群落结构、生态系统恢复力和其它生态系统属性的长期处理效果研究不足。我们介绍了美国西部干燥、低海拔森林常用的疏伐和规定燃烧处理 20 年来的反应,这些反应来自北落基山脉的一个长期研究地点,该地点是国家火灾和火灾替代物研究的一部分。我们全面综合了以往研究的短期(4 年)和中期(14 年)结果。然后,我们将这些结果置于山松甲虫(MPB;Dendroctonus ponderosae)爆发的背景下,该爆发影响了处理后 5-10 年的地点,并描述了 20 年的反应,以评估在山松甲虫爆发的情况下恢复和减少燃料处理的寿命。疏伐处理具有持续降低森林密度和提高树木生长率的效果,但当疏伐与规定火烧相结合时,效果更为明显。疏伐+规定火烧处理的额外好处是保持了最高比例的松柏(Pinus ponderosa)作为上层林木和再生林木。20 年后,林下原生植物覆盖率和丰富度或外来物种覆盖率仍无差异,但外来物种丰富度虽然相对于原生物种较低,但在疏伐+明火处理中仍高于对照组。20年后,疏伐处理的地上活碳储量恢复到接近对照和规定火烧处理的水平。由于与 MPB 爆发的相互作用,规定火灾处理和对照组的燃料负荷高于疏伐处理。由 MPB 引起的森林结构和燃料变化增加了对照组和明火处理 20 年后的火灾危险性。如果现在发生野火,疏伐+规定火灾处理的火灾强度可能最低,树木存活率最高,碳储量最稳定。我们的研究结果表明,在长达 20 年的时间里,疏伐和规定用火可以提高松柏林对野火和树皮甲虫的抵御能力,这一点得到了广泛的支持,但效果正在减弱,需要进行更多的燃料处理来保持抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
Integrating experiments and monitoring reveals extreme sensitivity of invasive winter annuals to precipitation. Evidence to inform spatiotemporal management of a western Pacific Ocean tuna purse seine fishery Contrasting effects of shooting disturbance on the movement and behavior of sympatric wildfowl species Terrestrial land use signals on groundwater fauna beyond current protection buffers Complementary effects of pollination and biocontrol services enable ecological intensification in macadamia orchards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1