Curtis W. Noonan, Ethan S. Walker, Erin O. Semmens, Annie Belcourt, Johna Boulafentis, Crissy Garcia, Jon Graham, Nolan Hoskie, Eugenia Quintana, Julie Simpson, Paul Smith, Howard L. Teasley Jr, Desirae Ware, Emily Weiler, Tony J. Ward
{"title":"Randomized trial in rural Native American homes heated with wood stoves: results from the EldersAIR study","authors":"Curtis W. Noonan, Ethan S. Walker, Erin O. Semmens, Annie Belcourt, Johna Boulafentis, Crissy Garcia, Jon Graham, Nolan Hoskie, Eugenia Quintana, Julie Simpson, Paul Smith, Howard L. Teasley Jr, Desirae Ware, Emily Weiler, Tony J. Ward","doi":"10.1007/s11869-023-01492-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Residential wood burning has both practical and traditional values among many indigenous communities of the US Mountain West, although household biomass burning also results in emissions that are harmful to health. In a household-level three-arm placebo-controlled randomized trial, we tested the efficacy of portable filtration units and education interventions on improving pulmonary function and blood pressure measures among elder participants that use wood stoves for residential heating. A total of 143 participants were assigned to the Education (<i>n</i> = 49), Filter (<i>n</i> = 47), and Control (<i>n</i> = 47) arms. Blood pressure and spirometry measures were collected multiple times during a pre-intervention winter period and during a follow-up post-intervention winter period. Despite strong PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure reduction results with the Filter arm (50% lower compared to Control arm), neither this intervention nor the Education intervention translated to improvements in the selected health measures among this population with a mixture of chronic conditions. Intention to treat analysis failed to demonstrate evidence that either of the intervention arms had beneficial effects on the blood pressure or the spirometry measures. Post hoc evaluation of effect modification for blood pressure and spirometry outcomes did not reveal any interaction influence on the outcomes according to sex, residential smoking, chronic disease history, and study area.</p><p>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02240069.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 5","pages":"967 - 978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-023-01492-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Residential wood burning has both practical and traditional values among many indigenous communities of the US Mountain West, although household biomass burning also results in emissions that are harmful to health. In a household-level three-arm placebo-controlled randomized trial, we tested the efficacy of portable filtration units and education interventions on improving pulmonary function and blood pressure measures among elder participants that use wood stoves for residential heating. A total of 143 participants were assigned to the Education (n = 49), Filter (n = 47), and Control (n = 47) arms. Blood pressure and spirometry measures were collected multiple times during a pre-intervention winter period and during a follow-up post-intervention winter period. Despite strong PM2.5 exposure reduction results with the Filter arm (50% lower compared to Control arm), neither this intervention nor the Education intervention translated to improvements in the selected health measures among this population with a mixture of chronic conditions. Intention to treat analysis failed to demonstrate evidence that either of the intervention arms had beneficial effects on the blood pressure or the spirometry measures. Post hoc evaluation of effect modification for blood pressure and spirometry outcomes did not reveal any interaction influence on the outcomes according to sex, residential smoking, chronic disease history, and study area.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.