Treatment patterns in metastatic bladder cancer in Japan: results of the CancerMPact® survey 2020.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Future oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.2217/fon-2023-0197
Ana Paula A Bueno, Otavio Clark, Matthew Turnure, Eloisa S Moreira, Akira Yuasa, Shigeru Sugiyama, Melissa Kirker, Si Li, Ningqi Hou, Jane Chang, Mairead Kearney, Gena Kanas
{"title":"Treatment patterns in metastatic bladder cancer in Japan: results of the CancerMPact<sup>®</sup> survey 2020.","authors":"Ana Paula A Bueno, Otavio Clark, Matthew Turnure, Eloisa S Moreira, Akira Yuasa, Shigeru Sugiyama, Melissa Kirker, Si Li, Ningqi Hou, Jane Chang, Mairead Kearney, Gena Kanas","doi":"10.2217/fon-2023-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To assess physician-reported treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in Japan. <b>Methods:</b> 76 physicians completed the CancerMPact<sup>®</sup> survey in July 2020, considering patients treated within 6 months. <b>Results:</b> Physicians treated a mean of 38.1 patients per month. Of cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients, 97.6 and 89.3%, respectively, received first-line platinum-based therapy, most commonly cisplatin plus gemcitabine (72.9%) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (59.7%). 1.6 and 5.6% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively. 48.4 and 45.0%, respectively, progressed and received second-line therapy, most commonly with pembrolizumab (61.7%). <b>Conclusion:</b> In 2020, most patients with metastatic bladder cancer in Japan received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, >50% received no subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for new treatment regimens to improve outcomes and maximize first-line treatment benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"603-611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2023-0197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess physician-reported treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in Japan. Methods: 76 physicians completed the CancerMPact® survey in July 2020, considering patients treated within 6 months. Results: Physicians treated a mean of 38.1 patients per month. Of cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients, 97.6 and 89.3%, respectively, received first-line platinum-based therapy, most commonly cisplatin plus gemcitabine (72.9%) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (59.7%). 1.6 and 5.6% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively. 48.4 and 45.0%, respectively, progressed and received second-line therapy, most commonly with pembrolizumab (61.7%). Conclusion: In 2020, most patients with metastatic bladder cancer in Japan received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, >50% received no subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for new treatment regimens to improve outcomes and maximize first-line treatment benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本转移性膀胱癌的治疗模式:2020 年 CancerMPact® 调查结果。
目的:评估日本医生报告的转移性膀胱癌治疗情况。方法:2020 年 7 月,76 名医生完成了 CancerMPact® 调查,其中包括 6 个月内接受治疗的患者。结果医生平均每月治疗 38.1 名患者。符合顺铂治疗条件和不符合顺铂治疗条件的患者中,分别有 97.6% 和 89.3% 接受了一线铂类治疗,其中最常见的是顺铂联合吉西他滨(72.9%)和卡铂联合吉西他滨(59.7%)。分别有 1.6% 和 5.6% 的患者接受了一线免疫检查点抑制剂治疗。分别有48.4%和45.0%的患者病情进展并接受了二线治疗,其中最常见的是使用pembrolizumab(61.7%)。结论2020年,日本大多数转移性膀胱癌患者接受了以铂类为基础的一线化疗;然而,超过50%的患者没有接受后续治疗,这凸显出需要新的治疗方案来改善预后并最大限度地发挥一线治疗的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy and safety of eribulin versus paclitaxel in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multimodality high-frequency ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical malignant lymphoma before biopsy. Genetic variants in mitochondrial sirtuins associated with brain tumor risk: a case-control study. Physician preferences of biomarker testing strategies in newly diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients. Testosterone recovery post discontinuation of androgen deprivation for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1