When does imagery require motor resources? A commentary on Bach et al., 2022.

IF 2.2 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1007/s00426-023-01917-6

Gilles Vannuscorps

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bach, Frank, and Kunde introduce a hypothesis that encompasses two main claims: (1) motor imagery relies primarily on representations of the perceptual effects of actions, and (2) the engagement of motor resources provides access to the specific timing, kinematic or internal bodily state that characterize an action. In this commentary, I argue that the first claim is compelling and suggest some alternatives to the second one.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

意象何时需要运动资源？对 Bach 等人的评论，2022 年。

巴赫、弗兰克和昆德提出了一个包含两个主要主张的假设：(1) 运动想象主要依赖于对动作感知效果的表征；(2) 运动资源的参与提供了对特定时间、运动学或内部身体状态的访问，而这些正是动作的特征。在这篇评论中，我将论证第一种说法的说服力，并对第二种说法提出一些替代方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

8.70%

发文量

137

期刊介绍： Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.