The long-term effect of work schedule, shift work disorder, insomnia and restless legs syndrome on headache among nurses: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/03331024231226323
Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Ståle Pallesen, Siri Waage, Bjørn Bjorvatn
{"title":"The long-term effect of work schedule, shift work disorder, insomnia and restless legs syndrome on headache among nurses: A prospective longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Ståle Pallesen, Siri Waage, Bjørn Bjorvatn","doi":"10.1177/03331024231226323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The preset study aimed to explore whether work schedules and sleep disorders predict the onset of headache.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted with questionnaire data from 2014 (baseline) and 2017 (follow-up) on work schedule, number of night shifts, number of quick returns, insomnia, shift work disorder (SWD), restless legs syndrome (RLS) and validated headache diagnoses among 1560 Norwegian nurses. Associations were explored by multivariate regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Work related factors at baseline did not predict onset of headache three years later. In the adjusted logistic regressions, insomnia at baseline predicted increased risk of new onset of migraine (odds ratio (OR) = 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-2.33), chronic headache (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.04-4.66) and medication-overuse headache (OR = 3.79; 95% CI = 1.26-11.42) at follow-up. SWD at baseline predicted new onset of migraine (OR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.07-2.50) and RLS at baseline predicted new onset of headache ≥1 day per month (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.01-2.36) and migraine (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.03-2.32) at follow-up. No factors predicted tension-type headache.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, work related factors did not predict the onset of headache three years later, whereas insomnia, SWD and RLS at baseline all increased the risk of future headaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024231226323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The preset study aimed to explore whether work schedules and sleep disorders predict the onset of headache.

Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with questionnaire data from 2014 (baseline) and 2017 (follow-up) on work schedule, number of night shifts, number of quick returns, insomnia, shift work disorder (SWD), restless legs syndrome (RLS) and validated headache diagnoses among 1560 Norwegian nurses. Associations were explored by multivariate regression analyses.

Results: Work related factors at baseline did not predict onset of headache three years later. In the adjusted logistic regressions, insomnia at baseline predicted increased risk of new onset of migraine (odds ratio (OR) = 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08-2.33), chronic headache (OR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.04-4.66) and medication-overuse headache (OR = 3.79; 95% CI = 1.26-11.42) at follow-up. SWD at baseline predicted new onset of migraine (OR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.07-2.50) and RLS at baseline predicted new onset of headache ≥1 day per month (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.01-2.36) and migraine (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.03-2.32) at follow-up. No factors predicted tension-type headache.

Conclusions: Overall, work related factors did not predict the onset of headache three years later, whereas insomnia, SWD and RLS at baseline all increased the risk of future headaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作息时间、轮班工作紊乱、失眠和不安腿综合征对护士头痛的长期影响:前瞻性纵向队列研究。
背景本预设研究旨在探讨工作日程和睡眠障碍是否会预测头痛的发病:这项纵向研究使用了2014年(基线)和2017年(随访)的问卷数据,调查了1560名挪威护士的工作日程、夜班次数、快速返回次数、失眠、轮班工作障碍(SWD)、不宁腿综合征(RLS)以及头痛的有效诊断。通过多变量回归分析探讨了这些因素之间的关联:结果:基线时的工作相关因素并不能预测三年后的头痛发病情况。在调整后的逻辑回归中,基线失眠预示着随访时新发偏头痛(几率比(OR)= 1.58;95% 置信区间(CI)= 1.08-2.33)、慢性头痛(OR = 2.02;95% CI = 1.04-4.66)和药物滥用性头痛(OR = 3.79;95% CI = 1.26-11.42)的风险增加。基线时的SWD可预测新发偏头痛(OR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.07-2.50),基线时的RLS可预测每月≥1天的新发头痛(OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.01-2.36)和随访时的偏头痛(OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.03-2.32)。没有任何因素可预测紧张型头痛:总体而言,与工作相关的因素并不能预测三年后头痛的发病,而基线时的失眠、社发症和劳累性头痛都会增加未来头痛的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
期刊最新文献
Abnormal electromyographical trigeminal activation through stimulation of the offending artery (Z-L response): An intraoperative tool during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. A call for academic pragmatic clinical trials to address open questions in migraine prevention. Outcomes, unmet needs, and challenges in the management of patients who withdraw from anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: A prospective cohort study. Internal jugular vein valve incompetence: A key consideration in patients with exercise-induced headache. Headache trajectories in children and adolescents with new onset continuous headache.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1