Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1177/03331024251327377
Umberto Pensato, Sabina Cevoli, Giulia Pierangeli, Pietro Cortelli
{"title":"Reply to \"What is the evolutionary disadvantage of migraine?\"","authors":"Umberto Pensato, Sabina Cevoli, Giulia Pierangeli, Pietro Cortelli","doi":"10.1177/03331024251327377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251327377","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 4","pages":"3331024251327377"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Methodological considerations in assessing the impact of CGRP monoclonal antibodies on blood pressure: The need for a broader perspective.","authors":"Davide Mascarella, Valentina Favoni, Giulia Pierangeli, Sabina Cevoli","doi":"10.1177/03331024251329513","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251329513","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 4","pages":"3331024251329513"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143779321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01DOI: 10.1177/03331024251327361
Marco Lisicki, Jean Schoenen
{"title":"What is the evolutionary disadvantage of migraine?","authors":"Marco Lisicki, Jean Schoenen","doi":"10.1177/03331024251327361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251327361","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 4","pages":"3331024251327361"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-04-03DOI: 10.1177/03331024251329506
Britt W H van der Arend, Floor C van Welie, Jan Versijpt, Antoinette Maassen Van Den Brink, Gisela M Terwindt
{"title":"Reply to \"Methodological considerations in assessing the impact of CGRP monoclonal antibodies on blood pressure\".","authors":"Britt W H van der Arend, Floor C van Welie, Jan Versijpt, Antoinette Maassen Van Den Brink, Gisela M Terwindt","doi":"10.1177/03331024251329506","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251329506","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 4","pages":"3331024251329506"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143779322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
BackgroundFew studies have examined plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels in individuals with vestibular migraine (VM), with inconsistent findings. Additionally, salivary CGRP levels in VM have not been reported.MethodsInterictal plasma and salivary CGRP levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in participants with VM corresponding to episodic migraine (VM, n = 81), chronic migraine without vestibular symptoms (CM, n = 73) and healthy controls (HC, n = 59).ResultsPlasma CGRP levels in VM with episodic migraine participants were significantly lower than those in participants with CM (median = 37.1 pg/mL, interquartile range (IQR) = 22.4-60.4 pg/mL vs. median = 74.6 pg/mL, IQR = 49.6-101.6 pg/mL; p < 0.001) but did not significantly differ from levels in HC. Similarly, salivary CGRP levels were also significantly lower in VM compared to CM (median = 54.5 pg/mL, IQR = 37.0-83.4 pg/mL vs. median = 72.0 pg/mL, IQR = 56.5-96.2 pg/mL; p = 0.036), with no significant difference observed between VM and HC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that plasma CGRP levels effectively differentiated CM from VM corresponding to episodic migraine, achieving an area under the curve of 0.88. No significant correlations were found between plasma or salivary CGRP levels and clinical features of CM and VM.ConclusionsInterictal plasma and salivary CGRP levels are unlikely to serve a biomarkers for VM.
{"title":"No change in interictal plasma and salivary CGRP levels in individuals with vestibular migraine corresponding to episodic migraine.","authors":"Yutong Bai, Min Kyung Chu, Jin-Ju Kang, Juhee Chae, Marianne Dieterich, Sun-Young Oh","doi":"10.1177/03331024251322418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251322418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundFew studies have examined plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels in individuals with vestibular migraine (VM), with inconsistent findings. Additionally, salivary CGRP levels in VM have not been reported.MethodsInterictal plasma and salivary CGRP levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in participants with VM corresponding to episodic migraine (VM, n = 81), chronic migraine without vestibular symptoms (CM, n = 73) and healthy controls (HC, n = 59).ResultsPlasma CGRP levels in VM with episodic migraine participants were significantly lower than those in participants with CM (median = 37.1 pg/mL, interquartile range (IQR) = 22.4-60.4 pg/mL vs. median = 74.6 pg/mL, IQR = 49.6-101.6 pg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.001) but did not significantly differ from levels in HC. Similarly, salivary CGRP levels were also significantly lower in VM compared to CM (median = 54.5 pg/mL, IQR = 37.0-83.4 pg/mL vs. median = 72.0 pg/mL, IQR = 56.5-96.2 pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.036), with no significant difference observed between VM and HC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that plasma CGRP levels effectively differentiated CM from VM corresponding to episodic migraine, achieving an area under the curve of 0.88. No significant correlations were found between plasma or salivary CGRP levels and clinical features of CM and VM.ConclusionsInterictal plasma and salivary CGRP levels are unlikely to serve a biomarkers for VM.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 3","pages":"3331024251322418"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143647526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-03-28DOI: 10.1177/03331024251331217
Massimiliano Valeriani, Andrew D Hershey, Aynur Özge
{"title":"Childhood and adolescent headache: A problem not to be ignored in the era of new therapies.","authors":"Massimiliano Valeriani, Andrew D Hershey, Aynur Özge","doi":"10.1177/03331024251331217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251331217","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 3","pages":"3331024251331217"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143728974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-03-17DOI: 10.1177/03331024251322446
Christopher L Robinson, Rune H Christensen, Haidar M Al-Khazali, Faisal Mohammad Amin, Ailing Yang, Richard B Lipton, Sait Ashina
BackgroundCervicogenic headache is a rare headache disorder which is garnering increasing clinical and research interest, but whose prevalence and clinical phenotype is surrounded by uncertainty. We found it timely to systematically appraise the current literature on prevalence, relative frequency, and clinical features of cervicogenic headache in population- and clinic-based settings.MethodsPubMed and Embase were searched for observational, population- and clinic-based studies published between 1 January 1942 and 3 September 2024 that reported on the prevalence and relative frequency of cervicogenic headache, diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The titles, abstracts, and full text-articles were screened by two independent investigators. To estimate prevalence and pooled relative frequency of cervicogenic headache across clinic- and population-based studies, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. The study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42024498128) and reported in accordance with the Guidelines for Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology.ResultsThree studies met the inclusion criteria from the International Classification of Headache Disorders for diagnosing cervicogenic headache. One was population-based reporting on the prevalence and two were clinic-based reporting on the relative frequency of cervicogenic headache among adult patients who were evaluated for headache in a tertiary care unit. The one population study reported a prevalence of 3.9% with females representing 77.8% of those affected. In the two clinic-based studies, the relative frequency was found to be 3.1% (95%, CI, 2.6-3.8) amongst the adult outpatient population of 3165 patients evaluated for headache, with women representing 80.8% (95%, CI, 71.9-87.4).ConclusionsBased on this meta-analysis, data on the prevalence and relative frequency of cervicogenic headache are limited. The scarcity of data stresses the need for further research into cervicogenic headache, the diagnostic criteria, and its current position in the International Classification of Headache Disorders.
{"title":"Prevalence and relative frequency of cervicogenic headache in population- and clinic-based studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Christopher L Robinson, Rune H Christensen, Haidar M Al-Khazali, Faisal Mohammad Amin, Ailing Yang, Richard B Lipton, Sait Ashina","doi":"10.1177/03331024251322446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251322446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCervicogenic headache is a rare headache disorder which is garnering increasing clinical and research interest, but whose prevalence and clinical phenotype is surrounded by uncertainty. We found it timely to systematically appraise the current literature on prevalence, relative frequency, and clinical features of cervicogenic headache in population- and clinic-based settings.MethodsPubMed and Embase were searched for observational, population- and clinic-based studies published between 1 January 1942 and 3 September 2024 that reported on the prevalence and relative frequency of cervicogenic headache, diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The titles, abstracts, and full text-articles were screened by two independent investigators. To estimate prevalence and pooled relative frequency of cervicogenic headache across clinic- and population-based studies, random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. The study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (identifier: CRD42024498128) and reported in accordance with the Guidelines for Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology.ResultsThree studies met the inclusion criteria from the International Classification of Headache Disorders for diagnosing cervicogenic headache. One was population-based reporting on the prevalence and two were clinic-based reporting on the relative frequency of cervicogenic headache among adult patients who were evaluated for headache in a tertiary care unit. The one population study reported a prevalence of 3.9% with females representing 77.8% of those affected. In the two clinic-based studies, the relative frequency was found to be 3.1% (95%, CI, 2.6-3.8) amongst the adult outpatient population of 3165 patients evaluated for headache, with women representing 80.8% (95%, CI, 71.9-87.4).ConclusionsBased on this meta-analysis, data on the prevalence and relative frequency of cervicogenic headache are limited. The scarcity of data stresses the need for further research into cervicogenic headache, the diagnostic criteria, and its current position in the International Classification of Headache Disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 3","pages":"3331024251322446"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143646857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2025-03-21DOI: 10.1177/03331024251329400
Petter Moe Omland, Johannes Orvin Hansen, Jan Petter Neverdahl, Martin Syvertsen Mykland, Dagfinn Matre, Martin Uglem, Trond Sand
BackgroundThe association between insufficient sleep and migraine is largely unexplained. In this blinded cross-over study we investigate whether insufficient sleep disturbs processing of nociceptive signals more in individuals with migraine compared to those without migraine.MethodsEvoked potentials to nociceptive laser stimuli and high density electrical dermal stimuli were recorded in migraine and control subjects after two nights of habitual sleep and after two nights of sleep restriction (4 h sleep/night). Researchers conducting the measurements and data processing were blinded to diagnosis and sleep condition. Both recordings were interictal in 21 migraine subjects. Amplitudes, amplitude habituation and latencies were compared to measurements in 31 controls.ResultsElectrically induced N2P2 amplitude showed more habituation after sleep restriction compared to habitual sleep in the migraine group (p < 0.025). The migraine group also had less N2P2 amplitude habituation after habitual sleep compared to the control group (p < 0.035). We found no effect of sleep restriction on N2P2 amplitude habituation to laser stimulation, and no effect of sleep restriction on N2P2 amplitudes.ConclusionInsufficient sleep may slightly increase cortical inhibitory responses in migraine. Our findings support that migraine is associated with a vulnerability for insufficient sleep between attacks.
{"title":"Migraine and insufficient sleep: The effect of sleep restriction on nociceptive evoked potentials in migraine.","authors":"Petter Moe Omland, Johannes Orvin Hansen, Jan Petter Neverdahl, Martin Syvertsen Mykland, Dagfinn Matre, Martin Uglem, Trond Sand","doi":"10.1177/03331024251329400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251329400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe association between insufficient sleep and migraine is largely unexplained. In this blinded cross-over study we investigate whether insufficient sleep disturbs processing of nociceptive signals more in individuals with migraine compared to those without migraine.MethodsEvoked potentials to nociceptive laser stimuli and high density electrical dermal stimuli were recorded in migraine and control subjects after two nights of habitual sleep and after two nights of sleep restriction (4 h sleep/night). Researchers conducting the measurements and data processing were blinded to diagnosis and sleep condition. Both recordings were interictal in 21 migraine subjects. Amplitudes, amplitude habituation and latencies were compared to measurements in 31 controls.ResultsElectrically induced N2P2 amplitude showed more habituation after sleep restriction compared to habitual sleep in the migraine group (p < 0.025). The migraine group also had less N2P2 amplitude habituation after habitual sleep compared to the control group (p < 0.035). We found no effect of sleep restriction on N2P2 amplitude habituation to laser stimulation, and no effect of sleep restriction on N2P2 amplitudes.ConclusionInsufficient sleep may slightly increase cortical inhibitory responses in migraine. Our findings support that migraine is associated with a vulnerability for insufficient sleep between attacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 3","pages":"3331024251329400"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143673393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}