Laboratory and simulated semi-field larvicidal efficacy of Aframomum angustifolium (Sonn.) K. Schum and Tagetes patula essential oils against Anopheles gambiae

Adelina Thomas , Eliningaya J. Kweka , Patrick Engeu Ogwang
{"title":"Laboratory and simulated semi-field larvicidal efficacy of Aframomum angustifolium (Sonn.) K. Schum and Tagetes patula essential oils against Anopheles gambiae","authors":"Adelina Thomas ,&nbsp;Eliningaya J. Kweka ,&nbsp;Patrick Engeu Ogwang","doi":"10.1016/j.napere.2024.100067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Malaria is a vector-borne, important public health problem spread by mosquitoes in tropical regions. The use of synthetic insecticides for mosquito control has been linked to insecticide resistance and environmental consequences. Thus, there is an urgent need to search for new highly selective and biodegradable insecticides lacking long-term toxicity to humans and mammals which are botanical-based compounds from indigenous plant sources available in local communities. Therefore, this study focused on evaluating the larvicidal activity of <em>Aframomum angustifolium</em> and <em>Tagetes patula</em> essential oils against <em>Anopheles gambiae</em> larvae in laboratory and simulated fields.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Eos was extracted by the hydro distillation method, and the chemical composition of the Eos was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The WHO protocol was followed for the laboratory and the simulated bioassays. Both laboratory-reared and field-collected larvae, as well as non-targeted organisms (<em>Gambusia affinis),</em> were used in simulated field conditions. The collected data were analyzed using probit analysis, and their means were compared in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using IBM SPSS Statistic version 26.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The main active ingredients in <em>T. patula</em> Eo were terpinolene (20.75 %) and (<em>Z</em>)-ocimene (17.10 %) and <em>A. angustifolium</em> were cis-pinen-3-ol (58.48 %) β-pinene (31.03 %). The EO of <em>T. patula</em> was the most efficacious in the bioassay. The larvicidal bioassay findings demonstrated that the mortality rate was dose- and exposure-dependent. In the laboratory, the EOs of <em>A. angustifolium</em> and <em>T. patula</em> have larvicidal activity against <em>An. gambiae</em> larvae, with LC50 values of 1.71 and 0.71 ppm after 48 h, respectively. Both binary combinations of the EOs showed synergistic interactions at 24 h but antagonistic interactions at 48 h. In the simulated field trial using laboratory-reared larvae, the mortality rate was higher in the simulated setting compared with the laboratory setting for all the tested concentrations for both EOs. Only <em>A. angustifolium</em> EO was toxic against <em>Gambusia affins</em> at 100 ppm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings of this study have shown that <em>T. patula</em> and <em>A. angustifolium</em> oils have good larvicidal activities for <em>An. gambiae</em>. The two plants are potential sources of larvicidal compounds that could be used to control the malaria vector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078624000013/pdfft?md5=75c6e784cd915ba826d20f144fa72802&pid=1-s2.0-S2773078624000013-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078624000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Malaria is a vector-borne, important public health problem spread by mosquitoes in tropical regions. The use of synthetic insecticides for mosquito control has been linked to insecticide resistance and environmental consequences. Thus, there is an urgent need to search for new highly selective and biodegradable insecticides lacking long-term toxicity to humans and mammals which are botanical-based compounds from indigenous plant sources available in local communities. Therefore, this study focused on evaluating the larvicidal activity of Aframomum angustifolium and Tagetes patula essential oils against Anopheles gambiae larvae in laboratory and simulated fields.

Methods

The Eos was extracted by the hydro distillation method, and the chemical composition of the Eos was determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The WHO protocol was followed for the laboratory and the simulated bioassays. Both laboratory-reared and field-collected larvae, as well as non-targeted organisms (Gambusia affinis), were used in simulated field conditions. The collected data were analyzed using probit analysis, and their means were compared in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using IBM SPSS Statistic version 26.

Results

The main active ingredients in T. patula Eo were terpinolene (20.75 %) and (Z)-ocimene (17.10 %) and A. angustifolium were cis-pinen-3-ol (58.48 %) β-pinene (31.03 %). The EO of T. patula was the most efficacious in the bioassay. The larvicidal bioassay findings demonstrated that the mortality rate was dose- and exposure-dependent. In the laboratory, the EOs of A. angustifolium and T. patula have larvicidal activity against An. gambiae larvae, with LC50 values of 1.71 and 0.71 ppm after 48 h, respectively. Both binary combinations of the EOs showed synergistic interactions at 24 h but antagonistic interactions at 48 h. In the simulated field trial using laboratory-reared larvae, the mortality rate was higher in the simulated setting compared with the laboratory setting for all the tested concentrations for both EOs. Only A. angustifolium EO was toxic against Gambusia affins at 100 ppm.

Conclusion

The findings of this study have shown that T. patula and A. angustifolium oils have good larvicidal activities for An. gambiae. The two plants are potential sources of larvicidal compounds that could be used to control the malaria vector.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aframomum angustifolium (Sonn.) K. Schum 和 Tagetes patula 精油对冈比亚按蚊的实验室和模拟半田间杀幼虫剂功效
导言疟疾是热带地区由蚊子传播的一种病媒传染的重要公共卫生问题。使用合成杀虫剂控制蚊虫与杀虫剂抗药性和环境后果有关。因此,迫切需要寻找对人类和哺乳动物无长期毒性的高选择性、可生物降解的新型杀虫剂,这些杀虫剂应是以植物为基础的化合物,来源于当地社区的本土植物。因此,本研究重点评估了 Aframomum angustifolium 和 Tagetes patula 精油在实验室和模拟田地中对冈比亚按蚊幼虫的杀虫活性。实验室和模拟生物测定均按照世界卫生组织的规程进行。在模拟野外条件下,使用了实验室饲养和野外采集的幼虫以及非目标生物(Gambusia affinis)。收集到的数据采用 probit 分析法进行分析,其平均值采用 IBM SPSS Statistic 26 版进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较。结果 T. patula 环氧乙烷的主要活性成分是萜品烯(20.75 %)和 (Z)-ocimene (17.10 %),A. angustifolium 的主要活性成分是顺式蒎烯-3-醇(58.48 %)和β-蒎烯(31.03 %)。在生物测定中,T. patula 的环氧乙烷最有效。杀幼虫生物测定结果表明,死亡率与剂量和接触有关。在实验室中,A. angustifolium 和 T. patula 的环氧乙烷对冈比亚幼虫具有杀幼虫活性,48 小时后的半数致死浓度分别为 1.71 和 0.71 ppm。在使用实验室饲养的幼虫进行的模拟田间试验中,两种环氧乙烷的所有测试浓度在模拟环境下的死亡率均高于实验室环境下的死亡率。本研究的结果表明,T. patula 和 A. angustifolium 油对冈比亚斑蚊具有良好的杀幼虫活性。这两种植物是潜在的杀幼虫剂化合物来源,可用于控制疟疾病媒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploration of growth inhibitory and oviposition deterrent behaviour of Brassica juncea seed extracts against Bactrocera cucurbitae Extraction solvents and geographical origins of Piper retrofractum on the control efficiency of Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera frugiperda in laboratory and greenhouse conditions Exploring the potential of saponins from Dicotyledonous plants in sustainable pest management: Innovations and challenges: A review A comprehensive account of functional role of insect gut microbiome in insect orders A pesticide powder prepared from four Chinese herbal medicine extracts as the active ingredient: Optimization of preparation process and quality examination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1