Planning for bicycle parking: Predicting demand using stated preference and count data

David Kohlrautz, Tobias Kuhnimhof
{"title":"Planning for bicycle parking: Predicting demand using stated preference and count data","authors":"David Kohlrautz,&nbsp;Tobias Kuhnimhof","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2024.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predicting bicycle parking demand is critical to optimizing parking facilities and thereby promoting cycling. Unfortunately, previous studies have not considered facility type and location when predicting bicycle parking demand, which is critical to meeting user needs, especially in scenarios with multiple parking options, such as on university campuses, as in our case study. The paper presents a predictive model for bicycle parking demand using a synthetic population derived from building space utilization data, a mobility survey, parking facility data, and results from a stated preference experiment on bicycle parking preferences. We evaluate the model’s quality using count data from 2022 and 2023 and the influence of including facility types (front wheel racks, u-racks, bicycle parking stations) and whether they are covered. We also analyze the influence of beeline-based distances to reach a facility and to get from the facility to the destination and examine how to weigh them.</p><p>Incorporating facility types and coverage substantially improves the model’s predictive accuracy, but only if the model’s sensitivity to walking distances between facilities and buildings is increased. This suggests that stated preference experiments on bicycle parking choice behavior may underestimate cyclists’ sensitivity to walking distances. In contrast, accounting for cycling detours to reach a facility does not contribute to prediction quality. Thus, when cyclists have multiple parking options, it is crucial to consider walking distances for realistic predictions. Furthermore, user-centered planning requires careful consideration of parking facility attributes and the specific preferences of target cyclist groups when determining the size and location of parking facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000020/pdfft?md5=646481c609ff8ae4e4391e66885faee5&pid=1-s2.0-S2950105924000020-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105924000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting bicycle parking demand is critical to optimizing parking facilities and thereby promoting cycling. Unfortunately, previous studies have not considered facility type and location when predicting bicycle parking demand, which is critical to meeting user needs, especially in scenarios with multiple parking options, such as on university campuses, as in our case study. The paper presents a predictive model for bicycle parking demand using a synthetic population derived from building space utilization data, a mobility survey, parking facility data, and results from a stated preference experiment on bicycle parking preferences. We evaluate the model’s quality using count data from 2022 and 2023 and the influence of including facility types (front wheel racks, u-racks, bicycle parking stations) and whether they are covered. We also analyze the influence of beeline-based distances to reach a facility and to get from the facility to the destination and examine how to weigh them.

Incorporating facility types and coverage substantially improves the model’s predictive accuracy, but only if the model’s sensitivity to walking distances between facilities and buildings is increased. This suggests that stated preference experiments on bicycle parking choice behavior may underestimate cyclists’ sensitivity to walking distances. In contrast, accounting for cycling detours to reach a facility does not contribute to prediction quality. Thus, when cyclists have multiple parking options, it is crucial to consider walking distances for realistic predictions. Furthermore, user-centered planning requires careful consideration of parking facility attributes and the specific preferences of target cyclist groups when determining the size and location of parking facilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规划自行车停车场:利用陈述偏好和计数数据预测需求
预测自行车停车需求对于优化停车设施从而促进自行车运动至关重要。遗憾的是,以往的研究在预测自行车停车需求时并未考虑设施类型和位置,而这对于满足用户需求至关重要,尤其是在有多种停车选择的情况下,例如在我们的案例研究中的大学校园。本文介绍了一个自行车停车需求预测模型,该模型使用了从建筑空间利用率数据、流动性调查、停车设施数据和自行车停车偏好实验结果中得出的合成人口。我们利用 2022 年和 2023 年的计数数据评估了模型的质量,并评估了包括设施类型(前轮架、U 型架、自行车停车站)和是否有覆盖的影响。我们还分析了到达设施和从设施到达目的地的距离的影响,并研究了如何权衡这些影响。纳入设施类型和覆盖范围大大提高了模型的预测准确性,但前提是提高模型对设施和建筑物之间步行距离的敏感度。这表明,关于自行车停车选择行为的陈述偏好实验可能低估了骑车人对步行距离的敏感性。与此相反,考虑骑车绕道到达设施的情况并不会提高预测质量。因此,当自行车骑行者有多种停车选择时,考虑步行距离对于做出切合实际的预测至关重要。此外,以用户为中心的规划要求在确定停车设施的大小和位置时,仔细考虑停车设施的属性和目标骑车群体的具体偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing an E-Bike City: An automated process for network-wide multimodal road space reallocation Scooting into place: How comfort on different infrastructure types influences shared e-scooter trip making A deep reinforcement learning solution to help reduce the cost in waiting time of securing a traffic light for cyclists Bike users’ route choice behaviour: Expectations from electric bikes versus reality in Greater Helsinki Overtaking on rural roads – Cyclists' and motorists' perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1