Distinctive features of experiential time: Duration, speed and event density

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Consciousness and Cognition Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2024.103635
Marianna Lamprou-Kokolaki , Yvan Nédélec , Simon Lhuillier , Virginie van Wassenhove
{"title":"Distinctive features of experiential time: Duration, speed and event density","authors":"Marianna Lamprou-Kokolaki ,&nbsp;Yvan Nédélec ,&nbsp;Simon Lhuillier ,&nbsp;Virginie van Wassenhove","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2024.103635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>William James’s use of “time in passing” and “stream of thoughts” may be two sides of the same coin that emerge from the brain segmenting the continuous flow of information into discrete events. Herein, we investigated how the density of events affects two temporal experiences: the felt duration and speed of time. Using a temporal bisection task, participants classified seconds-long videos of naturalistic scenes as short or long (duration), or slow or fast (passage of time). Videos contained a varying number and type of events. We found that a large number of events lengthened subjective duration and accelerated the felt passage of time. Surprisingly, participants were also faster at estimating their felt passage of time compared to duration. The perception of duration scaled with duration and event density, whereas the felt passage of time scaled with the rate of change. Altogether, our results suggest that distinct mechanisms underlie these two experiential times.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000023/pdfft?md5=6697bf6f634dbca76c7526d14184ec66&pid=1-s2.0-S1053810024000023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810024000023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

William James’s use of “time in passing” and “stream of thoughts” may be two sides of the same coin that emerge from the brain segmenting the continuous flow of information into discrete events. Herein, we investigated how the density of events affects two temporal experiences: the felt duration and speed of time. Using a temporal bisection task, participants classified seconds-long videos of naturalistic scenes as short or long (duration), or slow or fast (passage of time). Videos contained a varying number and type of events. We found that a large number of events lengthened subjective duration and accelerated the felt passage of time. Surprisingly, participants were also faster at estimating their felt passage of time compared to duration. The perception of duration scaled with duration and event density, whereas the felt passage of time scaled with the rate of change. Altogether, our results suggest that distinct mechanisms underlie these two experiential times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体验时间的显著特征:持续时间、速度和事件密度
威廉-詹姆斯(William James)使用的 "流逝的时间 "和 "思想流 "可能是一枚硬币的两面,是大脑将连续的信息流分割成离散事件的结果。在此,我们研究了事件的密度如何影响两种时间体验:感觉到的时间长度和时间速度。通过时间分割任务,参与者将几秒钟长的自然场景视频分为短或长(持续时间)、慢或快(时间流逝)。视频包含不同数量和类型的事件。我们发现,大量的事件会延长主观持续时间,加快时间流逝的感觉。令人惊讶的是,与持续时间相比,受试者在估计自己感觉的时间流逝时也更快。对持续时间的感知与持续时间和事件密度成比例,而对时间流逝的感受则与变化率成比例。总之,我们的研究结果表明,这两种体验时间的机制是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
期刊最新文献
The self can be associated with novel faces of in-group and out-group members: A cross-cultural study Attentional load leads to distinct changes in early and late cortical processing of target visibility under visual masking Comparing third-party responsibility with intention attribution: An fMRI investigation of moral judgment Provoking lucid dreams at home with sensory cues paired with pre-sleep cognitive training A Picture Corrects a Thousand Words – The Effect of Photos on Veracity Feedback
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1