User perception and ergonomic display layout design of truck camera monitor system

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103547
Sehee An , Songha Lee , Gihoon Park , Hyerim Lee , Minseok Son , Donghyun Beck
{"title":"User perception and ergonomic display layout design of truck camera monitor system","authors":"Sehee An ,&nbsp;Songha Lee ,&nbsp;Gihoon Park ,&nbsp;Hyerim Lee ,&nbsp;Minseok Son ,&nbsp;Donghyun Beck","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A camera monitor system (CMS) provides side/rear views via in-vehicle displays by replacing the existing mirrors with miniature cameras. Two surveys were conducted to determine the overall perception of truck drivers toward CMS compared to the conventional mirrors and to identify the ergonomic CMS display layout. Thirty experienced truck drivers evaluated CMS compared to the existing mirror system using six evaluation measures (intention to use, safety, convenience, rapidity and accuracy, preference, and superiority). Each respondent also evaluated eight different layout design alternatives using seven ergonomic evaluation measures (rapidity, accuracy, safety, convenience, learnability, intuitiveness, and preference). The design alternatives were developed by combining the locations of two truck CMS displays – one is </span><em>side display</em> replacing the main and wide-angle exterior mirrors and the other one is <em>front display</em> replacing the front mirror. The study results revealed that truck drivers rated the CMS highly compared to the existing mirror system across all six measures, suggesting the need for further academic and industrial research/development and thereby wider introduction of truck CMS. Also, the layout wherein the <em>side</em> and <em>front displays</em> were positioned at the A-pillar and middle-top-of-windshield locations, respectively, was found to be the best and its design characteristics were: 1) spatial correspondence between the provided information and the in-vehicle location for both the <em>side</em> and <em>front displays</em>, 2) spatial compatibility with driver expectation for the <em>side display</em>, 3) reduction in the eye movement required for the <em>front display</em>, and 4) spatial compatibility by relative position between the <em>side</em> and <em>front</em> displays.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A camera monitor system (CMS) provides side/rear views via in-vehicle displays by replacing the existing mirrors with miniature cameras. Two surveys were conducted to determine the overall perception of truck drivers toward CMS compared to the conventional mirrors and to identify the ergonomic CMS display layout. Thirty experienced truck drivers evaluated CMS compared to the existing mirror system using six evaluation measures (intention to use, safety, convenience, rapidity and accuracy, preference, and superiority). Each respondent also evaluated eight different layout design alternatives using seven ergonomic evaluation measures (rapidity, accuracy, safety, convenience, learnability, intuitiveness, and preference). The design alternatives were developed by combining the locations of two truck CMS displays – one is side display replacing the main and wide-angle exterior mirrors and the other one is front display replacing the front mirror. The study results revealed that truck drivers rated the CMS highly compared to the existing mirror system across all six measures, suggesting the need for further academic and industrial research/development and thereby wider introduction of truck CMS. Also, the layout wherein the side and front displays were positioned at the A-pillar and middle-top-of-windshield locations, respectively, was found to be the best and its design characteristics were: 1) spatial correspondence between the provided information and the in-vehicle location for both the side and front displays, 2) spatial compatibility with driver expectation for the side display, 3) reduction in the eye movement required for the front display, and 4) spatial compatibility by relative position between the side and front displays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡车摄像监控系统的用户感知和人体工学显示布局设计
摄像监控系统(CMS)用微型摄像头取代了现有的后视镜,通过车载显示器提供侧视/后视视图。为了确定卡车司机对 CMS 与传统后视镜相比的总体看法,以及确定符合人体工程学的 CMS 显示屏布局,我们进行了两项调查。30 名经验丰富的卡车司机通过六项评估指标(使用意愿、安全性、便利性、快速性和准确性、偏好和优越性)对 CMS 与现有后视镜系统进行了评估。每位受访者还使用七项人体工程学评估指标(快速性、准确性、安全性、便利性、可学习性、直观性和偏好性)对八种不同的布局设计方案进行了评估。这些设计方案是通过合并两个卡车 CMS 显示屏的位置开发出来的,一个是侧面显示屏,取代了主后视镜和广角外后视镜,另一个是正面显示屏,取代了前后视镜。研究结果表明,与现有的后视镜系统相比,卡车司机在所有六项衡量标准中对 CMS 的评价都很高,这表明有必要进行进一步的学术和工业研究/开发,从而更广泛地引入卡车 CMS。此外,研究还发现,侧面和正面显示屏分别位于 A 柱和挡风玻璃中间顶部位置的布局最佳,其设计特点是1) 侧部和前部显示屏提供的信息与车内位置在空间上相对应;2) 侧部显示屏在空间上与驾驶员的期望相一致;3) 减少前部显示屏所需的眼球运动;4) 侧部和前部显示屏之间的相对位置在空间上相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
期刊最新文献
Seamless switching, feedforward, and feedback mechanisms: Enhancing task performance and user perception in device switch Night work, circadian rhythm, and cognitive performance: A field study with airport security screeners Changes in forklift driving performance and postures among novices resulting from training using a high-fidelity virtual reality simulator: An exploratory study Employees trust, perceived justice, on task performance: Mediating and moderating role of autonomy and organizational culture Pilot workload measurement model based on task complexity analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1