Clinical cerebellar neuroscience: cognitive functioning in spinocerebellar ataxias: an update and future directions

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101343
Louisa P Selvadurai , Jeremy D Schmahmann , Ian H Harding
{"title":"Clinical cerebellar neuroscience: cognitive functioning in spinocerebellar ataxias: an update and future directions","authors":"Louisa P Selvadurai ,&nbsp;Jeremy D Schmahmann ,&nbsp;Ian H Harding","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive deficits are an increasingly well-recognised feature of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs). A growing body of research using the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale, as well as more targeted neuropsychological assessments, consistently supports the presence of multidomain cognitive impairments in the most common SCAs. However, it is also becoming clear that cognitive changes may impact only a subset of patients. Further research is necessary to understand the risk factors, demographic correlates and neural basis of this heterogeneity. Evidence that cognitive changes precede the onset of motor symptoms is emerging but remains equivocal, with many studies of pre-ataxic individuals limited by small sample sizes. Longitudinal assessments similarly suggest progressive cognitive decline over time, but the cognitive domains and tests that are most sensitive to change remain unclear. Finally, the functional impact of cognitive deficits on daily life in individuals with SCAs remains a significant knowledge gap.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154623000979/pdfft?md5=380ad360f6fabd0da0ebec54d59623ce&pid=1-s2.0-S2352154623000979-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154623000979","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive deficits are an increasingly well-recognised feature of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs). A growing body of research using the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale, as well as more targeted neuropsychological assessments, consistently supports the presence of multidomain cognitive impairments in the most common SCAs. However, it is also becoming clear that cognitive changes may impact only a subset of patients. Further research is necessary to understand the risk factors, demographic correlates and neural basis of this heterogeneity. Evidence that cognitive changes precede the onset of motor symptoms is emerging but remains equivocal, with many studies of pre-ataxic individuals limited by small sample sizes. Longitudinal assessments similarly suggest progressive cognitive decline over time, but the cognitive domains and tests that are most sensitive to change remain unclear. Finally, the functional impact of cognitive deficits on daily life in individuals with SCAs remains a significant knowledge gap.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床小脑神经科学:脊髓小脑共济失调症的认知功能:最新进展和未来方向
认知障碍是脊髓小脑性共济失调症(SCA)中一个日益得到广泛认可的特征。越来越多的研究使用小脑认知情感综合征量表(Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale)以及更有针对性的神经心理学评估,一致支持在最常见的SCA中存在多领域认知障碍。然而,认知变化可能只影响到一部分患者,这一点也越来越清楚。有必要开展进一步研究,以了解这种异质性的风险因素、人口学相关因素和神经基础。认知变化先于运动症状出现的证据正在出现,但仍然模棱两可,许多针对瘫痪前患者的研究因样本量较小而受到限制。纵向评估同样表明,随着时间的推移,认知能力会逐渐下降,但对变化最敏感的认知领域和测试仍不清楚。最后,认知障碍对 SCA 患者日常生活的功能影响仍然是一个重大的知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial magnetic stimulation in schizophrenia: exploring dosage and working memory enhancement Form, function and mechanics of femoral chordotonal organs in insects A light at the end of the axon: genetically encoded fluorescent indicators shine light on the dopamine system Dopaminergic computations for perceptual decisions From sensory motor and perceptual development to primary consciousness in the fetus: converging neural, behavioral, and imaging correlates of cognition-mediated emergent transitions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1