Analgesic Effects of Ibuprofen Soft and Flexible Absorbent Foam Dressing After Colorectal Surgery: A Single-Center Comparative Study

IF 0.2 Q4 SURGERY Formosan Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1097/fs9.0000000000000116
Tzu-Yen Cheng, Kee-Thai Kiu, Min-Hsuan Yen, Ka-Wai Tam, Tung-Cheng Chang
{"title":"Analgesic Effects of Ibuprofen Soft and Flexible Absorbent Foam Dressing After Colorectal Surgery: A Single-Center Comparative Study","authors":"Tzu-Yen Cheng, Kee-Thai Kiu, Min-Hsuan Yen, Ka-Wai Tam, Tung-Cheng Chang","doi":"10.1097/fs9.0000000000000116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Postoperative wound care and pain management are crucial components of the postoperative recovery process. This study aims to evaluate whether the analgesic effects of the ibuprofen soft and flexible absorbent foam dressing are superior to those of traditional gauze following colorectal surgery.\n \n \n \n Data pertaining to patients who underwent colorectal surgery between May 2021 and January 2022 were extracted from the electronic medical records database archive of a single institution. The ibuprofen soft and flexible absorbent foam dressing was applied to 62 patients for postoperative wound care, while gauze was used for 78 patients. Primary outcome measurements included the count of dressings, visual analog scale pain scores, analgesic dosage, complications, and length of hospitalization.\n \n \n \n The mean pain score on the 5th day postoperation was significantly lower for the ibuprofen group (2.03 ± 1.55) than for the control group (2.63 ± 1.72, p = 0.035). The mean dosage (mg) of parecoxib on the 3rd day postoperation was significantly lower for the ibuprofen group (2.58 ± 12.27) than for the control group (10.26 ± 21.80, p = 0.01). The cumulative number of dressing changes during the 1st week postoperation was significantly lower for the ibuprofen group (mean ± standard deviation; 3.00 ± 0.98) than for the control group (7.55 ± 2.68, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the complication rate or length of hospitalization between the groups.\n \n \n \n The ibuprofen soft and flexible absorbent foam dressing can either enhance the analgesic effect during postoperative recovery or reduce the cost and dressing time associated with postoperative wound care.\n","PeriodicalId":12390,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/fs9.0000000000000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative wound care and pain management are crucial components of the postoperative recovery process. This study aims to evaluate whether the analgesic effects of the ibuprofen soft and flexible absorbent foam dressing are superior to those of traditional gauze following colorectal surgery. Data pertaining to patients who underwent colorectal surgery between May 2021 and January 2022 were extracted from the electronic medical records database archive of a single institution. The ibuprofen soft and flexible absorbent foam dressing was applied to 62 patients for postoperative wound care, while gauze was used for 78 patients. Primary outcome measurements included the count of dressings, visual analog scale pain scores, analgesic dosage, complications, and length of hospitalization. The mean pain score on the 5th day postoperation was significantly lower for the ibuprofen group (2.03 ± 1.55) than for the control group (2.63 ± 1.72, p = 0.035). The mean dosage (mg) of parecoxib on the 3rd day postoperation was significantly lower for the ibuprofen group (2.58 ± 12.27) than for the control group (10.26 ± 21.80, p = 0.01). The cumulative number of dressing changes during the 1st week postoperation was significantly lower for the ibuprofen group (mean ± standard deviation; 3.00 ± 0.98) than for the control group (7.55 ± 2.68, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the complication rate or length of hospitalization between the groups. The ibuprofen soft and flexible absorbent foam dressing can either enhance the analgesic effect during postoperative recovery or reduce the cost and dressing time associated with postoperative wound care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结肠直肠手术后布洛芬软敷料和弹性吸收泡沫敷料的镇痛效果:单中心比较研究
术后伤口护理和疼痛控制是术后恢复过程中的关键环节。本研究旨在评估布洛芬软弹性吸收泡沫敷料在结直肠手术后的镇痛效果是否优于传统纱布。 研究人员从一家医疗机构的电子病历数据库档案中提取了 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 1 月期间接受结直肠手术的患者数据。62名患者使用布洛芬软弹性吸收泡沫敷料进行术后伤口护理,78名患者使用纱布。主要研究结果包括敷料数量、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、镇痛剂用量、并发症和住院时间。 布洛芬组术后第 5 天的平均疼痛评分(2.03 ± 1.55)明显低于对照组(2.63 ± 1.72,P = 0.035)。术后第三天帕瑞昔布的平均用量(毫克),布洛芬组(2.58 ± 12.27)明显低于对照组(10.26 ± 21.80,p = 0.01)。布洛芬组在术后第一周的累计换药次数(平均值 ± 标准差;3.00 ± 0.98)明显低于对照组(7.55 ± 2.68,P < 0.001)。两组的并发症发生率和住院时间没有明显差异。 布洛芬软弹性吸收泡沫敷料既能增强术后恢复期的镇痛效果,又能减少术后伤口护理的相关费用和敷料时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Formosan Journal of Surgery, a publication of Taiwan Surgical Association, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.e-fjs.org. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
期刊最新文献
Urethral Pseudodiverticulum with Left-Sided Non-Functioning Kidney: Case Report Upholding Ethical Standards in Post-Publication Interactions: A Call to Action Efficacy and Safety of Extended-Release Dinalbuphine Sebacate for Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Infected Urachal Cyst with Urethral Stricture Disease presenting with intraperitoneal perforation of cyst and pyoperitoneum AI-powered medicine is being repurposed to find novel surgical infection cures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1