Exploring the Impact of Gender Bias Among Medical Trainees

PRiMER Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.22454/primer.2024.177437
D. L. Terry, Christopher P. Terry, Allison Trabold, Michelle A. Nanda
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Gender Bias Among Medical Trainees","authors":"D. L. Terry, Christopher P. Terry, Allison Trabold, Michelle A. Nanda","doi":"10.22454/primer.2024.177437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Research has suggested that health care providers are not immune to implicit and explicit gender bias among their own colleagues and in the treatment of patients. To date, limited research examines gender bias in trainees and how that bias might intersect with patient care. Our study focused on gendered expectations, perceived competence of medical providers, and perceived acceptability of patients who advocate for themselves.\nMethods: We used a 2x2x2x2 mixed design to examine the impact of participant gender, type of physical exam (vaginal vs elbow), trainee status, and gender of vignette physician. Participants read and responded to vignettes depicting various standardized clinical scenarios. The complete sample included 342 participants from a rural medical teaching hospital and a private liberal arts college in the same geographic region.\nResults: Findings suggested a significant interaction between physicality and gender of the participant on perceived competence.\nConclusions: Although males and females had similar ratings of competence on an exam with low physicality (elbow), the data suggested that males did not recognize how errors during clinical practice may impact a hypothetical female patient. Future research might examine interventions that aim to increase awareness of gender bias among medical trainees and to explore whether interventions might improve patient care and perceptions of competence following identified errors.","PeriodicalId":507541,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/primer.2024.177437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Research has suggested that health care providers are not immune to implicit and explicit gender bias among their own colleagues and in the treatment of patients. To date, limited research examines gender bias in trainees and how that bias might intersect with patient care. Our study focused on gendered expectations, perceived competence of medical providers, and perceived acceptability of patients who advocate for themselves. Methods: We used a 2x2x2x2 mixed design to examine the impact of participant gender, type of physical exam (vaginal vs elbow), trainee status, and gender of vignette physician. Participants read and responded to vignettes depicting various standardized clinical scenarios. The complete sample included 342 participants from a rural medical teaching hospital and a private liberal arts college in the same geographic region. Results: Findings suggested a significant interaction between physicality and gender of the participant on perceived competence. Conclusions: Although males and females had similar ratings of competence on an exam with low physicality (elbow), the data suggested that males did not recognize how errors during clinical practice may impact a hypothetical female patient. Future research might examine interventions that aim to increase awareness of gender bias among medical trainees and to explore whether interventions might improve patient care and perceptions of competence following identified errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索性别偏见对医学实习生的影响
导言:研究表明,医疗服务提供者在对待病人和同事时,难免会受到隐性或显性性别偏见的影响。迄今为止,有关受训人员的性别偏见以及这种偏见如何与患者护理产生交集的研究十分有限。我们的研究主要关注性别期望、医疗服务提供者的能力感知以及患者对自我主张的可接受性感知:我们采用了 2x2x2x2 混合设计来研究参与者性别、体检类型(阴道检查与肘部检查)、受训者身份和小故事医生性别的影响。参与者阅读并回答描述各种标准化临床场景的小故事。完整样本包括 342 名参与者,他们分别来自同一地区的一家农村医疗教学医院和一所私立文理学院:结果:研究结果表明,参与者的体能和性别对感知能力有明显的交互作用:虽然男性和女性对低体力(肘部)检查的能力评价相似,但数据表明,男性没有认识到临床实践中的错误会如何影响假定的女性患者。未来的研究可能会研究旨在提高医学受训者对性别偏见的认识的干预措施,并探讨干预措施是否可以改善对患者的护理以及在发现错误后对能力的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching on the Fly: A Needs Assessment for an Ambulatory Resident-as-Teacher Workshop Food Insecurity: Physician Perspectives, Screening and Communication Trends in Vitamin B12 Level Testing in Patients on Metformin From 2000 to 2020 Virtual Care Integration: Balancing Physician Well-Being Define the Problem: Collaboration, Mission, or Funding?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1