Shackled by double disadvantage? Gender, segregation and immigrants’ occupational attainments

Anne Grönlund, I. Öun
{"title":"Shackled by double disadvantage? Gender, segregation and immigrants’ occupational attainments","authors":"Anne Grönlund, I. Öun","doi":"10.1177/00016993231219133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article was to determine whether immigrant women's occupational status reflect a double disadvantage in comparison to immigrant men and inborn women and how patterns are formed by occupational segregation. The study utilised register data for descriptive comparisons of the immigrant and inborn populations in Sweden ( n ≈ 4,900,000). Regression analyses were performed on nationally representative surveys of the immigrant ( n ≈ 2600) and total ( n ≈ 3200) labour force. The results do not support the notion of a double disadvantage. In the immigrant population, only women with primary/secondary education have jobs with lower average prestige than men, reflecting the fact that women are clustered in female-dominated occupations. Among immigrants with higher education, the gender gap is reversed, and men's disadvantage is explained by ethnic segregation. Compared to Swedish-born individuals, prestige gaps are substantially larger for men. After accounting for segregation, the gap is closed among women but not among men.","PeriodicalId":504233,"journal":{"name":"Acta Sociologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993231219133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article was to determine whether immigrant women's occupational status reflect a double disadvantage in comparison to immigrant men and inborn women and how patterns are formed by occupational segregation. The study utilised register data for descriptive comparisons of the immigrant and inborn populations in Sweden ( n ≈ 4,900,000). Regression analyses were performed on nationally representative surveys of the immigrant ( n ≈ 2600) and total ( n ≈ 3200) labour force. The results do not support the notion of a double disadvantage. In the immigrant population, only women with primary/secondary education have jobs with lower average prestige than men, reflecting the fact that women are clustered in female-dominated occupations. Among immigrants with higher education, the gender gap is reversed, and men's disadvantage is explained by ethnic segregation. Compared to Swedish-born individuals, prestige gaps are substantially larger for men. After accounting for segregation, the gap is closed among women but not among men.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重劣势的束缚?性别、隔离和移民的职业成就
文章的目的是确定移民妇女的职业状况是否反映了与移民男子和本地妇女相比的双重劣势,以及职业隔离是如何形成的。研究利用登记数据对瑞典的移民和本地出生人口(n ≈ 490 万)进行了描述性比较。对移民(n ≈ 2600)和劳动力总数(n ≈ 3200)的全国代表性调查进行了回归分析。结果并不支持双重不利的说法。在移民人口中,只有受过初等/中等教育的女性从事的工作的平均声望低于男性,这反映了女性集中从事女性占主导地位的职业这一事实。在受过高等教育的移民中,性别差距发生了逆转,男性的劣势可以用种族隔离来解释。与瑞典出生的人相比,男性的声望差距要大得多。在考虑种族隔离因素后,女性的差距缩小了,但男性的差距没有缩小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social theory and the digital: The institutionalisation of digital sociology Towards ‘augmented sociology’? A practice-oriented framework for using large language model-powered chatbots “Unless I could be like the typical dad”: Exploring parenthood through the perspective of the voluntarily childfree Automation risks of vocational training programs and early careers in the Netherlands The natural dividend: An introduction to resource rents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1