Evaluation of Perceived Environmental Risks of Residents' Life under the Perspective of Environmental Public Opinion

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Problemy Ekorozwoju Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.35784/preko.5386
Fengjiao Ye, Xueru Wang, Jun Lin
{"title":"Evaluation of Perceived Environmental Risks of Residents' Life under the Perspective of Environmental Public Opinion","authors":"Fengjiao Ye, Xueru Wang, Jun Lin","doi":"10.35784/preko.5386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population health, social development and the environment are important elements of sustainable development. This article uses the China People's Daily message board to collect environmental public opinion data, visualizes the public opinion hotspots of environmental based on word frequency statistics, and applies the Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) topic model to analyze the spatial distribution of environmental risk perception dimensions. The conclusions are as follows: (1) in terms of the hotspots of environmental public opinion, the most frequent occurrences are the living environment, interest demands and noise pollution. (2) There is heterogeneity in the topic of environmental risk perception. The perception of pollution source types has the highest weight in environmental risk perception in the eastern, central, and western regions. Specifically, the types of pollution sources in the eastern that receive the most attention are garbage and noise pollution. In addition to paying attention to noise pollution, the central and western also have a higher perceived weight on the polluters. Residents in northeast are most concerned about changes in residents' health and living environment quality. (3) From the perspective of environmental risk perception, health perception has the highest proportion in northeast, followed by the eastern, and finally the central and western. Proportion of perception of interest demands is highest in the central region, perception of residential environment quality is highest in the northeast region, perception of pollution source types is highest in the eastern, central, and western regions, and lowest in the northeast region. Finally, some practical and feasible policy recommendations were proposed for different regions.","PeriodicalId":44696,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","volume":"53 52","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Ekorozwoju","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population health, social development and the environment are important elements of sustainable development. This article uses the China People's Daily message board to collect environmental public opinion data, visualizes the public opinion hotspots of environmental based on word frequency statistics, and applies the Latent Dirichlet Allocations (LDA) topic model to analyze the spatial distribution of environmental risk perception dimensions. The conclusions are as follows: (1) in terms of the hotspots of environmental public opinion, the most frequent occurrences are the living environment, interest demands and noise pollution. (2) There is heterogeneity in the topic of environmental risk perception. The perception of pollution source types has the highest weight in environmental risk perception in the eastern, central, and western regions. Specifically, the types of pollution sources in the eastern that receive the most attention are garbage and noise pollution. In addition to paying attention to noise pollution, the central and western also have a higher perceived weight on the polluters. Residents in northeast are most concerned about changes in residents' health and living environment quality. (3) From the perspective of environmental risk perception, health perception has the highest proportion in northeast, followed by the eastern, and finally the central and western. Proportion of perception of interest demands is highest in the central region, perception of residential environment quality is highest in the northeast region, perception of pollution source types is highest in the eastern, central, and western regions, and lowest in the northeast region. Finally, some practical and feasible policy recommendations were proposed for different regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境舆情视角下的居民生活环境风险感知评估
人口健康、社会发展与环境是可持续发展的重要内容。本文利用《中国人民网》留言板收集环境舆情数据,基于词频统计对环境舆情热点进行可视化分析,并应用潜狄利克特分配(LDA)主题模型分析环境风险认知维度的空间分布。结论如下(1)从环境舆情热点来看,出现频率最高的是生活环境、利益诉求和噪声污染。(2)环境风险认知主题存在异质性。污染源类型认知在东、中、西部地区环境风险认知中的权重最高。具体来说,东部地区最受关注的污染源类型是垃圾污染和噪声污染。除关注噪声污染外,中部和西部对污染源的感知权重也较高。东北部居民最关注的是居民健康和生活环境质量的变化。(3)从环境风险感知来看,东北地区居民健康感知比重最高,其次是东部地区,最后是中西部地区。利益诉求感知比例中部地区最高,居住环境质量感知东北地区最高,污染源类型感知东、中、西部地区最高,东北地区最低。最后,针对不同地区提出了一些切实可行的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Problemy Ekorozwoju
Problemy Ekorozwoju ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Inclusive Economy as a Component of Sustainable Development Attitudes Towards Environmental Protection in International Comparative Research Assessing Forest Conservation Strategies for Biodiversity Restoration and Sustainable Development: A Comparative Analysis of Global Income Groups Kilka uwag o zrównoważonym rozwoju sfery edukacji. Postulowana i faktyczna poprawa edukacji Analysis of the Decisive Factors of Government Attracting Tourists in Public Management from the Perspective of Environmental Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1