The unequal conversion of intended redistribution into factual redistribution in Europe and its impact on social inequalities between families

Patricia Frericks, Julia Höppner
{"title":"The unequal conversion of intended redistribution into factual redistribution in Europe and its impact on social inequalities between families","authors":"Patricia Frericks, Julia Höppner","doi":"10.1177/00016993231224223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Redistribution is one of the key elements of contemporary social order, and research has dealt with it in various ways. Most welfare state research mixes in its analysis the regulations on redistribution and actual outcomes. However, to adequately understand redistribution, one needs to distinguish between regulations and outcomes. Measuring unequal conversion in terms of deviations between redistributions as regulated and redistributive outcomes shows how far a redistribution corresponds to what has been officially agreed upon in societies and who is actually better or worse off in the end. Empirically focusing on family-related redistribution, our analysis was based on European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions data and the European microsimulation tool EUROMOD. First, we assumed that differences between regulations and outcomes vary depending on the family type. Thus, we compared the actual and simulated disposable household income for various family types. Second, we assumed that differences between regulations and outcomes vary by country. Consequently, we analysed a variety of European countries. Our findings showed that there are substantial differences between regulations on redistribution and outcomes. These differences increase income inequalities between families. This held true for all of our study countries, although to a different degree.","PeriodicalId":504233,"journal":{"name":"Acta Sociologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Sociologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00016993231224223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Redistribution is one of the key elements of contemporary social order, and research has dealt with it in various ways. Most welfare state research mixes in its analysis the regulations on redistribution and actual outcomes. However, to adequately understand redistribution, one needs to distinguish between regulations and outcomes. Measuring unequal conversion in terms of deviations between redistributions as regulated and redistributive outcomes shows how far a redistribution corresponds to what has been officially agreed upon in societies and who is actually better or worse off in the end. Empirically focusing on family-related redistribution, our analysis was based on European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions data and the European microsimulation tool EUROMOD. First, we assumed that differences between regulations and outcomes vary depending on the family type. Thus, we compared the actual and simulated disposable household income for various family types. Second, we assumed that differences between regulations and outcomes vary by country. Consequently, we analysed a variety of European countries. Our findings showed that there are substantial differences between regulations on redistribution and outcomes. These differences increase income inequalities between families. This held true for all of our study countries, although to a different degree.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲将预期的再分配不平等地转化为实际的再分配及其对家庭间社会不平等的影响
再分配是当代社会秩序的关键要素之一,研究以各种方式对其进行了处理。大多数福利国家研究在分析中将再分配法规与实际结果混为一谈。然而,要充分理解再分配,就需要区分规定和结果。用规定的再分配与再分配结果之间的偏差来衡量不平等转换,可以显示再分配在多大程度上符合社会正式达成的共识,以及最终谁的境况更好或更差。我们的分析基于欧盟收入和生活条件统计数据以及欧洲微观模拟工具 EUROMOD,以与家庭相关的再分配为实证重点。首先,我们假设法规和结果之间的差异因家庭类型而异。因此,我们比较了不同家庭类型的实际和模拟可支配家庭收入。其次,我们假设法规和结果之间的差异因国家而异。因此,我们对多个欧洲国家进行了分析。我们的研究结果表明,再分配法规与结果之间存在巨大差异。这些差异加剧了家庭之间的收入不平等。我们研究的所有国家都存在这种情况,只是程度不同而已。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social theory and the digital: The institutionalisation of digital sociology Towards ‘augmented sociology’? A practice-oriented framework for using large language model-powered chatbots “Unless I could be like the typical dad”: Exploring parenthood through the perspective of the voluntarily childfree Automation risks of vocational training programs and early careers in the Netherlands The natural dividend: An introduction to resource rents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1