Prediction of Translation Quality by Risk-Taking and Critical Thinking Among Translation Learners

Pantea Pahlavani, Samira Ghanbari
{"title":"Prediction of Translation Quality by Risk-Taking and Critical Thinking Among Translation Learners","authors":"Pantea Pahlavani, Samira Ghanbari","doi":"10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship between Iranian translation learners’ critical thinking (CT), risk-taking (RT), and their English-to-Persian translation quality. To achieve this aim, a group of 120 male and female university students majoring in English translation (ET) were selected based on convenience sampling. Then, two questionnaires, namely CT and RT, were administered to them. Along with the questionnaires, two texts were given to all participants to translate. The quality of translations was assessed based on Farahzad’s (1992) model by two raters. After data collection and analysis, it was revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between participants’ CT and RT and their translation quality. Moreover, further data analysis showed that RT was a better predictor of translation quality than CT. The findings of this study would be applicable to translation learners, teachers, and translation training courses.","PeriodicalId":492462,"journal":{"name":"International journal of linguistics, literature and translation","volume":"32 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of linguistics, literature and translation","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship between Iranian translation learners’ critical thinking (CT), risk-taking (RT), and their English-to-Persian translation quality. To achieve this aim, a group of 120 male and female university students majoring in English translation (ET) were selected based on convenience sampling. Then, two questionnaires, namely CT and RT, were administered to them. Along with the questionnaires, two texts were given to all participants to translate. The quality of translations was assessed based on Farahzad’s (1992) model by two raters. After data collection and analysis, it was revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between participants’ CT and RT and their translation quality. Moreover, further data analysis showed that RT was a better predictor of translation quality than CT. The findings of this study would be applicable to translation learners, teachers, and translation training courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过翻译学习者的冒险精神和批判性思维预测翻译质量
本研究的主要目的是调查伊朗翻译学习者的批判性思维(CT)、冒险精神(RT)与其英译波斯语翻译质量之间的关系。为实现这一目标,研究人员采用便利抽样法选取了 120 名英语翻译(ET)专业的男女大学生。然后,向他们发放了两份问卷,即 CT 和 RT。在发放问卷的同时,还向所有参与者发放了两篇文章,让他们进行翻译。翻译质量由两名评分员根据 Farahzad(1992 年)的模型进行评估。数据收集和分析结果表明,参与者的 CT 和 RT 与翻译质量之间存在显著的正相关关系。此外,进一步的数据分析显示,RT 比 CT 更能预测翻译质量。本研究的结果适用于翻译学习者、教师和翻译培训课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Cognitive Analysis of “Power” A Stylistic Analysis of Joe Biden's Inaugural Political Speech Translation Research in the Arabic Language: A Bibliometric Study Artificial Intelligence Impact on Human Translation: Legal Texts as a Case Study Expressions of Impossibility in Arabic and English: Unveiling Students’ Translation Difficulties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1