Assessing the Feasibility of On-Shift Simulation to Improve Capacity Assessments by EMS Clinicians

Daniel Du Pont, Jonathan Bar, James Baca, Krystal Hunter, Alexander Kuc, Aman Shah, Gerard Carroll
{"title":"Assessing the Feasibility of On-Shift Simulation to Improve Capacity Assessments by EMS Clinicians","authors":"Daniel Du Pont, Jonathan Bar, James Baca, Krystal Hunter, Alexander Kuc, Aman Shah, Gerard Carroll","doi":"10.56068/xcqz5297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nDetermining the decision-making capacity of patients in the prehospital setting is a high-risk area for EMS systems. This risk is only enhanced by the growing prevalence of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of on-shift simulation as an educational method, in this case to improve EMS clinicians’ ability and confidence in performing capacity assessments.  \nMethods \nThis was a prospective experimental feasibility study performed at an urban, tertiary, academic medical center that operates its own EMS service. All participants were active EMTs or Paramedics. Subjects completed a pretest containing 10 patient scenarios addressing specific components of a complete capacity assessment. For each, participants were asked to decide if the patient had capacity and to rate how confident they were. They then participated in a simulated encounter with a standardized patient, designed to evaluate and teach skills in capacity assessment. A post-scenario debrief and didactic session were conducted. Lastly, subjects took a post-test consisting of the same 10 scenarios and confidence assessments. \nResults \n22 subjects completed the study. While there was no significant difference between the number of scenarios answered correctly before and after the intervention (9.18 vs 9.27), participants’ confidence scores did significantly increase (87.2 to 95.2, p < 0.001). This increase was driven by scenarios pertaining to mild dementia, pediatrics, and substance use. \nConclusions \nPrehospital clinicians were able to correctly assess capacity in a variety of scenarios. A didactic session including a simulated patient encounter led to a significant increase in participants’ confidence in performing capacity assessments. This study revealed specific areas in which clinicians would likely benefit from further education, but further research is needed to ensure generalizability.","PeriodicalId":73465,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paramedicine","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56068/xcqz5297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective Determining the decision-making capacity of patients in the prehospital setting is a high-risk area for EMS systems. This risk is only enhanced by the growing prevalence of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of on-shift simulation as an educational method, in this case to improve EMS clinicians’ ability and confidence in performing capacity assessments.  Methods This was a prospective experimental feasibility study performed at an urban, tertiary, academic medical center that operates its own EMS service. All participants were active EMTs or Paramedics. Subjects completed a pretest containing 10 patient scenarios addressing specific components of a complete capacity assessment. For each, participants were asked to decide if the patient had capacity and to rate how confident they were. They then participated in a simulated encounter with a standardized patient, designed to evaluate and teach skills in capacity assessment. A post-scenario debrief and didactic session were conducted. Lastly, subjects took a post-test consisting of the same 10 scenarios and confidence assessments. Results 22 subjects completed the study. While there was no significant difference between the number of scenarios answered correctly before and after the intervention (9.18 vs 9.27), participants’ confidence scores did significantly increase (87.2 to 95.2, p < 0.001). This increase was driven by scenarios pertaining to mild dementia, pediatrics, and substance use. Conclusions Prehospital clinicians were able to correctly assess capacity in a variety of scenarios. A didactic session including a simulated patient encounter led to a significant increase in participants’ confidence in performing capacity assessments. This study revealed specific areas in which clinicians would likely benefit from further education, but further research is needed to ensure generalizability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估轮班模拟改善急救医疗临床医生能力评估的可行性
目标 确定院前环境中患者的决策能力是急救医疗系统的一个高风险领域。由于精神、神经和药物使用失调的发病率越来越高,这种风险也随之增加。本研究旨在评估轮班模拟作为一种教育方法的可行性,以提高急救医疗临床医生进行能力评估的能力和信心。 方法 这是一项前瞻性实验可行性研究,在一个城市的三级学术医疗中心进行,该中心拥有自己的急救服务。所有参与者都是在职的急救医生或护理人员。受试者完成了一个包含 10 个病人场景的预测试,这些场景涉及完整能力评估的特定组成部分。对于每个场景,受试者都被要求判断病人是否具备行为能力,并评定他们的自信程度。然后,他们参加了与标准化病人的模拟接触,旨在评估和教授能力评估技能。随后进行情景模拟后的汇报和授课。最后,受试者参加了由同样的 10 个情景和信心评估组成的后测试。结果 22 名受试者完成了研究。虽然干预前后正确回答的情景数量没有明显差异(9.18 vs 9.27),但受试者的信心分数却显著提高(从 87.2 到 95.2,p < 0.001)。这一提高主要是由于与轻度痴呆、儿科和药物使用相关的情景。结论 院前临床医生能够在各种情况下正确评估容量。通过模拟患者就诊的教学课程,参与者对进行行为能力评估的信心有了显著提高。本研究揭示了临床医生可能会从进一步教育中受益的特定领域,但还需要进一步研究以确保可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Threat or Challenge Response of Undergraduate Paramedicine Students During High-Stress Clinical Scenarios The State of Emergency Medical Services Clinician Mental Health in Virginia Demonstration of Doppler Ultrasound Pulse Detection by Trained Prehospital Personnel Influence of Rurality When Accessing Emergency Healthcare During Exacerbation of Asthma Paramedicine Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1