Demonstration of Doppler Ultrasound Pulse Detection by Trained Prehospital Personnel

Daniel Martin
{"title":"Demonstration of Doppler Ultrasound Pulse Detection by Trained Prehospital Personnel","authors":"Daniel Martin","doi":"10.56068/qggb1958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Data suggests that finger palpation of the carotid and/or femoral pulses is significantly less sensitive than 100%. In some cases, a patient who does, in fact, have organized cardiac function, may be identified as being in Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA). Chest compressions performed as indicated by these circumstances may not provide significant therapeutic benefit to those patients and may, in fact, distract from better directed therapies. Doppler Ultrasonography (DUSG) has been shown to be more sensitive than human fingers. This research aims to assess whether EMT-Basics and Paramedics can be quickly and inexpensively trained to use DUSG as a tool for pulse detection.\nMethods: Participants viewed a recorded video 4 minutes 18 seconds in length which detailed an anterior-to-posterior fanning technique for assessing presence of a carotid pulse using a doppler ultrasound device. The participants were given a short period of time to practice and familiarize themselves with the device. Participants were then timed while demonstrating application of ultrasound-conducting gel to a volunteer and using the device to detect a carotid pulse. The time recording ceased when the participant verbalized confirmation of the pulse, and their success or failure was annotated.\nResults: Credentialed EMT-Basics and Paramedics, with minimal training, consistently demonstrated the ability to accurately and rapidly assess a carotid pulse using a doppler ultrasound device. \nConclusions: This research suggests that prehospital personnel can be efficiently trained to use available and inexpensive doppler ultrasound devices to determine cardiac pulse status. Furthermore, it suggests that the technique itself can be used to detect the carotid pulse quickly and accurately. Further research in patient care settings should be undertaken to evaluate the utility of doppler ultrasound devices in distinguishing PEA from Pseudo-PEA.","PeriodicalId":73465,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paramedicine","volume":"115 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56068/qggb1958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Data suggests that finger palpation of the carotid and/or femoral pulses is significantly less sensitive than 100%. In some cases, a patient who does, in fact, have organized cardiac function, may be identified as being in Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA). Chest compressions performed as indicated by these circumstances may not provide significant therapeutic benefit to those patients and may, in fact, distract from better directed therapies. Doppler Ultrasonography (DUSG) has been shown to be more sensitive than human fingers. This research aims to assess whether EMT-Basics and Paramedics can be quickly and inexpensively trained to use DUSG as a tool for pulse detection. Methods: Participants viewed a recorded video 4 minutes 18 seconds in length which detailed an anterior-to-posterior fanning technique for assessing presence of a carotid pulse using a doppler ultrasound device. The participants were given a short period of time to practice and familiarize themselves with the device. Participants were then timed while demonstrating application of ultrasound-conducting gel to a volunteer and using the device to detect a carotid pulse. The time recording ceased when the participant verbalized confirmation of the pulse, and their success or failure was annotated. Results: Credentialed EMT-Basics and Paramedics, with minimal training, consistently demonstrated the ability to accurately and rapidly assess a carotid pulse using a doppler ultrasound device. Conclusions: This research suggests that prehospital personnel can be efficiently trained to use available and inexpensive doppler ultrasound devices to determine cardiac pulse status. Furthermore, it suggests that the technique itself can be used to detect the carotid pulse quickly and accurately. Further research in patient care settings should be undertaken to evaluate the utility of doppler ultrasound devices in distinguishing PEA from Pseudo-PEA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经过培训的院前人员演示多普勒超声波脉冲检测
背景和目的:数据表明,用手指触摸颈动脉和/或股动脉搏动的灵敏度明显低于 100%。在某些情况下,病人实际上具有有组织的心脏功能,但可能被认定为处于无脉搏电活动(PEA)状态。在这种情况下进行的胸外按压可能不会给这些患者带来明显的治疗效果,反而会分散他们对更好的治疗方法的注意力。多普勒超声(DUSG)已被证明比人的手指更灵敏。本研究旨在评估是否可以快速、低成本地培训急救员和辅助医务人员使用多普勒超声波检查仪作为脉搏检测工具:方法:参与者观看一段时长为 4 分 18 秒的录制视频,视频详细介绍了使用多普勒超声设备评估颈动脉脉搏的前后扇动技术。参与者有短暂的时间练习和熟悉设备。然后,参赛者在向一名志愿者演示涂抹超声传导凝胶和使用设备检测颈动脉脉搏时被计时。当参与者口头确认脉搏时,时间记录停止,并标注其成功或失败:结果:经过最低限度培训的合格急救员和辅助医务人员一致表现出有能力使用多普勒超声设备准确、快速地评估颈动脉脉搏。结论:这项研究表明,可以对院前人员进行有效培训,使其能够使用现有的廉价多普勒超声设备来确定心脏脉搏状态。此外,研究还表明该技术本身可用于快速准确地检测颈动脉脉搏。应在患者护理环境中开展进一步研究,以评估多普勒超声设备在区分 PEA 和假性 PEA 方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Threat or Challenge Response of Undergraduate Paramedicine Students During High-Stress Clinical Scenarios The State of Emergency Medical Services Clinician Mental Health in Virginia Demonstration of Doppler Ultrasound Pulse Detection by Trained Prehospital Personnel Influence of Rurality When Accessing Emergency Healthcare During Exacerbation of Asthma Paramedicine Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1