Improving attitudes toward poverty and attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration through online interprofessional synchronous poverty simulation: A mixed methods comparison study

Barbara L. Wise, Katti J. Sneed, Kathryn R. Gilreath, Ruth A. Eby, Sarah F. Farmer
{"title":"Improving attitudes toward poverty and attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration through online interprofessional synchronous poverty simulation: A mixed methods comparison study","authors":"Barbara L. Wise, Katti J. Sneed, Kathryn R. Gilreath, Ruth A. Eby, Sarah F. Farmer","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v14n4p43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Interprofessional poverty simulations can improve attitudes toward poverty and attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration. This study evaluated an immersive synchronous online poverty simulation.Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted to compare the outcomes of onsite and online interprofessional poverty simulations. The simulations were carried out at a private university in the US 6 times onsite between 2017 and 2019, and 4 times online between 2020 and 2021. The quantitative portion utilized two pre- and post-test questionnaires: the Attitudes Toward Poverty Short Form and the University of West England Interprofessional Questionnaire, which evaluate attitudes towards poverty and interprofessional collaboration respectively. Additionally, qualitative interviews of selected students were conducted 2-4 weeks after the simulations. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired t-tests for individual results, and independent samples t-tests to compare onsite with online pre-post changes. Qualitative data were evaluated using thematic analysis by faculty members from three disciplines.Results: The research indicates that both online and onsite poverty simulations can improve student attitudes toward both poverty and interprofessional collaboration. Results for 196 online participants were compared to 325 onsite participants. Both online and onsite groups showed significant improvements in attitudes toward poverty and interprofessional collaboration (p < .05). The quantitative effect size was smaller for online than onsite, but the difference was less in 2021, the second year of the online simulation, likely due to improved implementation techniques. The qualitative data suggested a less intense emotional response for online participants compared to onsite.  Overall results suggest that there is a learning curve in offering an effective online poverty simulation, but that online poverty simulations do significantly influence attitudes toward poverty and interprofessional collaboration.Recommendation: In the article, lessons learned are shared. Online simulations can effectively change attitudes toward poverty, and allow many students to participate who otherwise might not be able to, but the magnitude of the impact for our population was not as great online as onsite. It is recommended that schools of nursing and faculty of other healthcare professions consider the pros and cons of incorporating interprofessional poverty simulations in their curricula.","PeriodicalId":73866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing education and practice","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing education and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v14n4p43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interprofessional poverty simulations can improve attitudes toward poverty and attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration. This study evaluated an immersive synchronous online poverty simulation.Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted to compare the outcomes of onsite and online interprofessional poverty simulations. The simulations were carried out at a private university in the US 6 times onsite between 2017 and 2019, and 4 times online between 2020 and 2021. The quantitative portion utilized two pre- and post-test questionnaires: the Attitudes Toward Poverty Short Form and the University of West England Interprofessional Questionnaire, which evaluate attitudes towards poverty and interprofessional collaboration respectively. Additionally, qualitative interviews of selected students were conducted 2-4 weeks after the simulations. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired t-tests for individual results, and independent samples t-tests to compare onsite with online pre-post changes. Qualitative data were evaluated using thematic analysis by faculty members from three disciplines.Results: The research indicates that both online and onsite poverty simulations can improve student attitudes toward both poverty and interprofessional collaboration. Results for 196 online participants were compared to 325 onsite participants. Both online and onsite groups showed significant improvements in attitudes toward poverty and interprofessional collaboration (p < .05). The quantitative effect size was smaller for online than onsite, but the difference was less in 2021, the second year of the online simulation, likely due to improved implementation techniques. The qualitative data suggested a less intense emotional response for online participants compared to onsite.  Overall results suggest that there is a learning curve in offering an effective online poverty simulation, but that online poverty simulations do significantly influence attitudes toward poverty and interprofessional collaboration.Recommendation: In the article, lessons learned are shared. Online simulations can effectively change attitudes toward poverty, and allow many students to participate who otherwise might not be able to, but the magnitude of the impact for our population was not as great online as onsite. It is recommended that schools of nursing and faculty of other healthcare professions consider the pros and cons of incorporating interprofessional poverty simulations in their curricula.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过在线跨专业同步贫困模拟改善对贫困的态度和对跨专业合作的态度:混合方法比较研究
导言:跨专业贫困模拟可以改善人们对贫困的态度以及对跨专业合作的态度。本研究对沉浸式同步在线贫困模拟进行了评估:本研究采用混合方法对现场和在线跨专业贫困模拟的结果进行了比较。模拟活动于 2017 年至 2019 年期间在美国一所私立大学进行了 6 次现场模拟,并于 2020 年至 2021 年期间进行了 4 次在线模拟。定量部分采用了两份测试前和测试后问卷:《对贫困的态度简表》和《西英格兰大学跨专业问卷》,分别评估对贫困和跨专业合作的态度。此外,还在模拟活动结束 2-4 周后对部分学生进行了定性访谈。定量数据采用配对 t 检验来分析单个结果,采用独立样本 t 检验来比较现场和在线模拟后的变化。来自三个学科的教师使用主题分析法对定性数据进行了评估:研究表明,在线和现场贫困模拟都能改善学生对贫困和跨专业合作的态度。对 196 名在线参与者和 325 名现场参与者的结果进行了比较。在线组和现场组对贫困和跨专业合作的态度都有显著改善(p < .05)。在线组的定量效果小于现场组,但在 2021 年,即在线模拟的第二年,两者之间的差异较小,这可能是由于改进了实施技术。定性数据表明,与现场模拟相比,在线参与者的情绪反应没有那么强烈。 总体结果表明,提供有效的在线贫困模拟需要一段学习曲线,但在线贫困模拟确实能显著影响人们对贫困和跨专业合作的态度:建议:在文章中分享经验教训。在线模拟可以有效地改变人们对贫困的态度,并让许多原本无法参与的学生参与进来,但对我们的人群来说,在线模拟的影响程度不如现场模拟大。建议护理学院和其他医疗保健专业的教师考虑将跨专业贫困模拟纳入课程的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“What are we doing here?”: Reflections on developing a transcultural “Road Map” for global menstrual hygiene management Analysis of nurses’ intention to resign and its reasons in a tertiary Grade-A hospital in Beijing during the post-pandemic era Utilizing learning communities to enhance classroom and clinical synergy across the curriculum Contraceptive use in the Gaza Strip: A systematic review Supporting graduate students’ skills with simulated experiences in a professional foundation course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1