You are not selected: Two field studies on the association between dehumanization and social rejection

Gert-Jan Lelieveld, Marret K. Noordewier, Frank T. Doolaard, Eric van Dijk
{"title":"You are not selected: Two field studies on the association between dehumanization and social rejection","authors":"Gert-Jan Lelieveld,&nbsp;Marret K. Noordewier,&nbsp;Frank T. Doolaard,&nbsp;Eric van Dijk","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the current research we investigated how people deal with decisions in which they have to reject others, something that is unavoidably part of many selection procedures. Integrating insights derived from research on social exclusion and dehumanization, we argued that when people need to reject others, they dehumanize them. To study the association between dehumanization and rejecting in a real-life setting, we conducted two field studies, in which we examined the selection process in student houses, where residents can accept some prospective members, but have to reject others. As predicted, our findings showed that when people need to reject targets, they subtly dehumanize them. Moreover, dehumanizing rejected targets was related to lower rejection aversion. This suggests that when people dehumanize those they have to reject, rejection is easier.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000030/pdfft?md5=5e0da626b301a9f015afbe8393ccda34&pid=1-s2.0-S2666622724000030-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current research we investigated how people deal with decisions in which they have to reject others, something that is unavoidably part of many selection procedures. Integrating insights derived from research on social exclusion and dehumanization, we argued that when people need to reject others, they dehumanize them. To study the association between dehumanization and rejecting in a real-life setting, we conducted two field studies, in which we examined the selection process in student houses, where residents can accept some prospective members, but have to reject others. As predicted, our findings showed that when people need to reject targets, they subtly dehumanize them. Moreover, dehumanizing rejected targets was related to lower rejection aversion. This suggests that when people dehumanize those they have to reject, rejection is easier.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
您未被选中:关于非人化与社会排斥之间关系的两项实地研究
在当前的研究中,我们调查了人们如何处理必须拒绝他人的决定,这是许多选择程序中不可避免的一部分。结合从社会排斥和非人化研究中得出的见解,我们认为,当人们需要拒绝他人时,他们会将他人非人化。为了在现实生活中研究非人化与拒绝之间的关系,我们进行了两项实地研究,考察了学生宿舍的选择过程。正如预测的那样,我们的研究结果表明,当人们需要拒绝目标时,他们会巧妙地将其非人化。此外,将被拒绝对象非人化与降低拒绝厌恶感有关。这表明,当人们对必须拒绝的对象进行非人性化处理时,拒绝会变得更容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
期刊最新文献
Consequences of group-based misperceptions of climate concern for efficacy and action Table of Contents Nonverbal facial cues signaling sexually transmitted infections cause dehumanization and discrimination Should we talk (more) about climate change when promoting energy conservation? An intervention in Swiss households The proximal distant: How does remote acculturation affect wellbeing in the multicultural context of Lebanon?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1