Current research in ecological and social psychology最新文献

Don’t let MI be misunderstood: A causal view on measurement invariance 不要让MI被误解：关于测量不变性的因果观点

IF 2.2

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100261

Philipp Sterner , Florian Pargent , David Goretzko

Measurement invariance (MI) is often treated as a statistical prerequisite for meaningful comparisons of constructs across groups or time points. However, this perspective overlooks the substantive implications (a lack of) MI can have for psychological theories of constructs. In this paper, we frame MI as a causal concept with theoretical significance. We present a causal framework based on directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) that allows researchers to reason about potential causes of non-invariance and include them in their modeling strategy. We argue that non-invariance should not be seen as prohibitive for further exploration and analyses but as an opportunity to generate new insights about constructs and their measurement. That is, under non-invariance, data need a different treatment than simply comparing means between groups and causal reasoning can guide researchers in this regard. We demonstrate the opportunities of the causal framework through an application to the cross-sectional study of acquiescent response style. We further discuss an extension of the causal framework to longitudinal designs. When investigating the invariance of measurements over time, the framework can help to take into account expected or desired non-invariance; for example, when constructs evolve over time or when interventions change measurement models. By showing that MI has substantive theoretical implications, we bridge the gap between methodological rigor and applied research reality.

测量不变性（MI）通常被视为跨组或跨时间点结构进行有意义比较的统计先决条件。然而，这种观点忽略了MI对构念心理学理论的实质性影响（缺乏）。在本文中，我们将MI定义为一个具有理论意义的因果概念。我们提出了一个基于有向无环图（dag）的因果框架，该框架允许研究人员推断非不变性的潜在原因，并将其纳入建模策略。我们认为，非不变性不应该被视为禁止进一步的探索和分析，而是作为一个机会，以产生新的见解关于结构和他们的测量。也就是说，在非不变条件下，数据需要不同于简单的组间均值比较的处理方式，而因果推理可以在这方面指导研究者。我们通过应用于默认反应风格的横断面研究来证明因果框架的机会。我们进一步讨论了纵向设计因果框架的扩展。当研究测量随时间的不变性时，框架可以帮助考虑预期的或期望的非不变性；例如，当结构随着时间的推移而演变，或者当干预措施改变测量模型时。通过表明人工智能具有实质性的理论意义，我们弥合了方法严谨性和应用研究现实之间的差距。

{"title":"Don’t let MI be misunderstood: A causal view on measurement invariance","authors":"Philipp Sterner , Florian Pargent , David Goretzko","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100261","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Measurement invariance (MI) is often treated as a statistical prerequisite for meaningful comparisons of constructs across groups or time points. However, this perspective overlooks the substantive implications (a lack of) MI can have for psychological theories of constructs. In this paper, we frame MI as a causal concept with theoretical significance. We present a causal framework based on directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) that allows researchers to reason about potential causes of non-invariance and include them in their modeling strategy. We argue that non-invariance should not be seen as prohibitive for further exploration and analyses but as an opportunity to generate new insights about constructs and their measurement. That is, under non-invariance, data need a different treatment than simply comparing means between groups and causal reasoning can guide researchers in this regard. We demonstrate the opportunities of the causal framework through an application to the cross-sectional study of acquiescent response style. We further discuss an extension of the causal framework to longitudinal designs. When investigating the invariance of measurements over time, the framework can help to take into account expected or desired non-invariance; for example, when constructs evolve over time or when interventions change measurement models. By showing that MI has substantive theoretical implications, we bridge the gap between methodological rigor and applied research reality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145977297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Using invariance testing to study religiosity: A within culture comparison of the bases of religiosity 用不变性检验研究宗教信仰：宗教信仰基础的文化内部比较

IF 2.2

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100260

Larissa Hartle , Giovanna Bortolini , Everton Maraldi , Ronald Fischer

We test Saroglou’s four-dimensional framework of religiosity in Brazil. The presence of religious traditions that vary in their formalization of institutional structures offers an important context for testing the scale. Using recent advances in invariance testing, we conducted two studies (total N = 3091) with adherents from five religious groupings as well as spiritual but not religious individuals compared to non-religious individuals. Overall, the four-factor scale showed good psychometric properties in the total sample. However, for followers of Afro-Brazilian religions as an example of non-institutionalized traditions a simpler single-factor structure was found. We obtained partial scalar invariance across a subset of religious groups. Explorations of the noninvariant item intercepts suggested that some items carried group-specific interpretations, especially those related to ritual practices and emotional experiences (Bonding dimension). Latent means were overall highest for Believing and lowest for Belonging, with Evangelicals scoring highest on all dimensions. Both the invariance and latent mean patterns were replicated and further differentiated in a replication study. Our study demonstrates the utility of within-cultural invariance analysis and highlights the importance of statistical replications for exploring cognitive dimensions underlying survey responses. Considering bases of religiosity, our invariance results suggest both a shared cognitive structure of religiosity and group-specific interpretations of motivations around ritual practices and emotions across religions varying in their level of institutionalization.

我们在巴西测试了Saroglou的宗教信仰四维框架。宗教传统的存在在其制度结构的形式化方面各不相同，为测试规模提供了一个重要的背景。利用最新的不变性检验，我们进行了两项研究（总N = 3091），研究对象是来自五个宗教团体的信徒，以及有宗教信仰但不信教的个体与不信教的个体进行了比较。总体而言，四因子量表在总样本中显示出良好的心理测量特性。然而，对于非制度化传统的非巴西裔宗教的追随者来说，发现了一个更简单的单因素结构。我们得到了一组宗教群体的部分标量不变性。对非不变项目拦截的探索表明，一些项目具有群体特定的解释，特别是那些与仪式实践和情感体验相关的项目（结合维度）。总体而言，“信仰”的潜在均值最高，“归属感”的潜在均值最低，福音派在所有维度上都得分最高。在重复研究中，不变性和潜在平均模式都被复制并进一步分化。我们的研究证明了文化内不变性分析的效用，并强调了统计重复对于探索调查反应背后的认知维度的重要性。考虑到宗教信仰的基础，我们的不变性结果表明，宗教信仰的共同认知结构和群体对宗教仪式和情感动机的特定解释在其制度化水平上有所不同。

{"title":"Using invariance testing to study religiosity: A within culture comparison of the bases of religiosity","authors":"Larissa Hartle , Giovanna Bortolini , Everton Maraldi , Ronald Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100260","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100260","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We test Saroglou’s four-dimensional framework of religiosity in Brazil. The presence of religious traditions that vary in their formalization of institutional structures offers an important context for testing the scale. Using recent advances in invariance testing, we conducted two studies (total <em>N</em> = 3091) with adherents from five religious groupings as well as spiritual but not religious individuals compared to non-religious individuals. Overall, the four-factor scale showed good psychometric properties in the total sample. However, for followers of Afro-Brazilian religions as an example of non-institutionalized traditions a simpler single-factor structure was found. We obtained partial scalar invariance across a subset of religious groups. Explorations of the noninvariant item intercepts suggested that some items carried group-specific interpretations, especially those related to ritual practices and emotional experiences (Bonding dimension). Latent means were overall highest for Believing and lowest for Belonging, with Evangelicals scoring highest on all dimensions. Both the invariance and latent mean patterns were replicated and further differentiated in a replication study. Our study demonstrates the utility of within-cultural invariance analysis and highlights the importance of statistical replications for exploring cognitive dimensions underlying survey responses. Considering bases of religiosity, our invariance results suggest both a shared cognitive structure of religiosity and group-specific interpretations of motivations around ritual practices and emotions across religions varying in their level of institutionalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Nature’s value associated with traditional worldviews: psychological validation of relational, intrinsic, and instrumental dimensions in Japan 与传统世界观相关的自然价值：日本关系、内在和工具维度的心理验证

IF 2.2

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100259

Wakaba Tateishi , Yo Nakawake , Shuhei Fujii , Shota Shibasaki , Ryosuke Nakadai

Understanding how people perceive the value of nature is essential for protecting nature. Previous studies have proposed three types of nature’s value: instrumental, intrinsic, and relational. Relational value refers to the perceived appropriateness of the relationship individuals maintain with nature. Although relational values have been discussed in the context of traditional worldviews, empirical research examining the associations among the three types of nature's values and traditional beliefs remains limited. This study investigated the connections between perceptions of nature’s value and traditional religious-oriented worldviews, including animism and anthropocentrism. To explore whether the three types of nature’s value are applicable in a non-Western context, we conducted a preregistered online survey with 745 Japanese participants. Our findings indicate that (i) relational value is linked to traditional religious-oriented worldviews; (ii) relational value shows a strong association with scales measuring human-nature relationships; and (iii) the distinctions among instrumental, intrinsic, and relational values extend beyond Western contexts. These results support the conceptual and construct validity of the three types of nature’s value and offer deeper insights into the diverse ways individuals relate to nature.

了解人们如何看待自然的价值对保护自然至关重要。先前的研究提出了三种类型的自然价值：工具价值、内在价值和关系价值。关系价值是指个体与自然保持关系的感知适当性。尽管在传统世界观的背景下已经讨论了关系价值，但检验三种类型的自然价值与传统信仰之间联系的实证研究仍然有限。本研究调查了对自然价值的认知与传统宗教导向的世界观之间的联系，包括万物有灵论和人类中心主义。为了探索这三种类型的自然价值是否适用于非西方环境，我们对745名日本参与者进行了一项预先注册的在线调查。我们的研究结果表明：(1)关系价值与传统的宗教取向世界观有关；（ii）关系值与衡量人与自然关系的尺度有很强的关联性；（iii）工具价值、内在价值和关系价值之间的区别超越了西方语境。这些结果支持了三种类型的自然价值的概念和结构有效性，并为个体与自然的不同方式提供了更深入的见解。

{"title":"Nature’s value associated with traditional worldviews: psychological validation of relational, intrinsic, and instrumental dimensions in Japan","authors":"Wakaba Tateishi , Yo Nakawake , Shuhei Fujii , Shota Shibasaki , Ryosuke Nakadai","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100259","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100259","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding how people perceive the value of nature is essential for protecting nature. Previous studies have proposed three types of nature’s value: instrumental, intrinsic, and relational. Relational value refers to the perceived appropriateness of the relationship individuals maintain with nature. Although relational values have been discussed in the context of traditional worldviews, empirical research examining the associations among the three types of nature's values and traditional beliefs remains limited. This study investigated the connections between perceptions of nature’s value and traditional religious-oriented worldviews, including animism and anthropocentrism. To explore whether the three types of nature’s value are applicable in a non-Western context, we conducted a preregistered online survey with 745 Japanese participants. Our findings indicate that (i) relational value is linked to traditional religious-oriented worldviews; (ii) relational value shows a strong association with scales measuring human-nature relationships; and (iii) the distinctions among instrumental, intrinsic, and relational values extend beyond Western contexts. These results support the conceptual and construct validity of the three types of nature’s value and offer deeper insights into the diverse ways individuals relate to nature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145791710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Exploring generalizability from the bottom up: Applying DTS to demonstrate an item-level approach to personality assessment 从下到上探索普遍性：应用DTS来展示项目级人格评估方法

IF 2.2

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100256

Kendall Mather , Sara J. Weston , David M. Condon

Evidence for measurement invariance across groups is regarded as a prerequisite for administering a personality measure in diverse samples and an important criterion for generalizability. However, popular statistical techniques for establishing measurement invariance focus predominantly on broad, scale-level constructs, and there is growing recognition among personality psychologists of the value of item-level assessment. This poses a challenge: while the higher degree of precision offered by more narrowly defined constructs can be beneficial for advancing our scientific understanding of topics studied in personality psychology, it can come at the expense of conducting culturally diverse and inclusive studies. This paper explores the role of measurement invariance evidence in studies that focus on narrower personality constructs––particularly at the item-level––using a sample from the Synthetic Aperture Personality Assessment (SAPA) project consisting of participants (N = 1025,954) residing in 13 culturally and geographically diverse nations. We address the overall lack of available statistical techniques for addressing invariance-related questions at the item-level and demonstrate an approach that compares the item-level empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDFs) of two groups using 2623 items from the International Personality item Pool (IPIP). Findings point to nations and items with the most significant differences in ECDFs, which may reflect true cultural differences or potential psychometric challenges. ECDF-based tests capture distribution-wide differences that similar, more standard tests cannot detect, making them potentially useful for addressing a variety of research questions.

跨群体测量不变性的证据被认为是在不同样本中管理人格测量的先决条件，也是通用性的重要标准。然而，建立测量不变性的流行统计技术主要集中在广泛的、量表水平的结构上，并且人格心理学家越来越认识到项目水平评估的价值。这就提出了一个挑战：虽然更狭义的构念所提供的更高的精确度有助于我们对人格心理学研究主题的科学理解，但它可能以进行文化多样性和包容性研究为代价。本文探讨了测量不变性证据在研究中所起的作用，这些研究关注的是较窄的人格结构——特别是在项目层面——使用了一个来自合成孔径人格评估（SAPA）项目的样本，该项目由居住在13个文化和地理上不同的国家的参与者（N = 1025,954）组成。我们解决了总体上缺乏可用的统计技术来解决项目层面的不变性相关问题，并展示了一种方法，该方法使用国际人格项目库（IPIP）中的2623个项目来比较两组的项目层面经验累积分布函数（ecdf）。研究结果指出，在ecdf中存在最显著差异的国家和项目，这可能反映了真正的文化差异或潜在的心理挑战。基于ecdf的测试捕获了分布范围内的差异，这是类似的、更标准的测试无法检测到的，这使得它们对于解决各种研究问题具有潜在的用处。

{"title":"Exploring generalizability from the bottom up: Applying DTS to demonstrate an item-level approach to personality assessment","authors":"Kendall Mather , Sara J. Weston , David M. Condon","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100256","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100256","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evidence for measurement invariance across groups is regarded as a prerequisite for administering a personality measure in diverse samples and an important criterion for generalizability. However, popular statistical techniques for establishing measurement invariance focus predominantly on broad, scale-level constructs, and there is growing recognition among personality psychologists of the value of item-level assessment. This poses a challenge: while the higher degree of precision offered by more narrowly defined constructs can be beneficial for advancing our scientific understanding of topics studied in personality psychology, it can come at the expense of conducting culturally diverse and inclusive studies. This paper explores the role of measurement invariance evidence in studies that focus on narrower personality constructs––particularly at the item-level––using a sample from the Synthetic Aperture Personality Assessment (SAPA) project consisting of participants (<em>N</em> = 1025,954) residing in 13 culturally and geographically diverse nations. We address the overall lack of available statistical techniques for addressing invariance-related questions at the item-level and demonstrate an approach that compares the item-level empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDFs) of two groups using 2623 items from the International Personality item Pool (IPIP). Findings point to nations and items with the most significant differences in ECDFs, which may reflect true cultural differences or potential psychometric challenges. ECDF-based tests capture distribution-wide differences that similar, more standard tests cannot detect, making them potentially useful for addressing a variety of research questions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145712156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Roma Eterna? Roman rule explains regional well-being divides in Germany 罗马绮年华?罗马统治解释了德国地区福利的差异

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100214

Martin Obschonka , Fabian Wahl , Michael Fritsch , Michael Wyrwich , P. Jason Rentfrow , Jeff Potter , Samuel D. Gosling

In light of persistent regional inequalities in adaptive outcomes such as health, well-being, and related personality traits, psychological research is increasingly adopting a historical perspective to understand the deeper roots of these patterns. In this study, we examine the role of ancient cultures, specifically the impact of Roman civilization around two thousand years ago, on the macro-psychological character of German regions. We compare present-day regions that were advanced by Roman culture with those that remained outside of Roman influence. Even when accounting for more recent historical factors, we find that regions developed by Roman civilization show more adaptive personality patterns (Big Five) and better health and psychological well-being today. Results from a spatial regression discontinuity design indicate a significant effect of the Roman border on present-day regional variation in these outcomes. Additional analyses suggest that Roman investments in economic institutions (e.g., trade infrastructure such as Roman roads, markets, and mines) were crucial in creating this long-term effect. Together, these results demonstrate how ancient cultures can imprint a macro-psychological legacy that contributes to present-day regional inequalities.

鉴于在健康、福祉和相关人格特征等适应性结果方面持续存在区域不平等，心理学研究越来越多地采用历史视角来理解这些模式的更深层次根源。在这项研究中，我们研究了古代文化的作用，特别是两千年前罗马文明对德国地区宏观心理特征的影响。我们将今天受罗马文化影响的地区与那些未受罗马影响的地区进行比较。即使考虑到更近的历史因素，我们发现罗马文明发展的地区今天表现出更多的适应性人格模式（大五种）和更好的健康和心理健康。空间回归不连续设计的结果表明，罗马边界对这些结果的当今区域变化有显著影响。其他分析表明，罗马人对经济机构（如罗马道路、市场和矿山等贸易基础设施）的投资对于创造这种长期效应至关重要。总之，这些结果表明，古代文化如何在宏观心理上留下印记，从而导致当今的地区不平等。

{"title":"Roma Eterna? Roman rule explains regional well-being divides in Germany","authors":"Martin Obschonka , Fabian Wahl , Michael Fritsch , Michael Wyrwich , P. Jason Rentfrow , Jeff Potter , Samuel D. Gosling","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100214","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100214","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In light of persistent regional inequalities in adaptive outcomes such as health, well-being, and related personality traits, psychological research is increasingly adopting a historical perspective to understand the deeper roots of these patterns. In this study, we examine the role of ancient cultures, specifically the impact of Roman civilization around two thousand years ago, on the macro-psychological character of German regions. We compare present-day regions that were advanced by Roman culture with those that remained outside of Roman influence. Even when accounting for more recent historical factors, we find that regions developed by Roman civilization show more adaptive personality patterns (Big Five) and better health and psychological well-being today. Results from a spatial regression discontinuity design indicate a significant effect of the Roman border on present-day regional variation in these outcomes. Additional analyses suggest that Roman investments in economic institutions (e.g., trade infrastructure such as Roman roads, markets, and mines) were crucial in creating this long-term effect. Together, these results demonstrate how ancient cultures can imprint a macro-psychological legacy that contributes to present-day regional inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143140405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editorial: Introduction to the special issue on globalizing psychological science to include in the Middle East and Africa 社论：关于心理科学全球化的特刊导言，包括在中东和非洲

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100208

S. Arzu Wasti , Othman Alkhadher , Moustapha Achoui , Michele J. Gelfand

引用次数: 0

Cultural differences in perceptions of power: A cultural logics perspective 权力认知的文化差异：文化逻辑视角

IF 2.2

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100249

Saïd Shafa , Jennifer R. Overbeck , Yoshihisa Kashima

Cross-cultural research has long recognized the significance of power relations and their outcomes for social interactions, yet little empirical work has explored this important construct in the context of the Cultural Logics framework. This study examined cultural differences in perceptions of collaborative versus coercive theories of power among members of dignity (USA), face (China), and honor (Egypt) cultures and considered the role of cultural norms as well as subjective worldviews in predicting those perceptions. Results showed overall endorsement of a collaborative theory of power over a coercive theory of power across cultures. Yet, there were also cultural differences in people’s perception of power. Agreement with a collaborative theory of power over a coercive theory of power was most pronounced among Chinese respondents and less evident among Egyptian and American respondents. Mediation analyses showed that these differences were mainly accounted for through less dangerous worldviews, as well as stronger endorsement of face and honor norms. The study provides novel insights into the different ways in which cultural contexts shape individual worldviews that legitimize coercive versus collaborative pathways to power and influence. It further refines our understanding of cultural logics beyond self-worth implications, highlighting their relevance for navigating power hierarchies.

跨文化研究早就认识到权力关系及其结果对社会互动的重要性，但很少有实证工作在文化逻辑框架的背景下探讨这一重要结构。本研究考察了尊严文化（美国）、面子文化（中国）和荣誉文化（埃及）成员对合作与强制权力理论的认知差异，并考虑了文化规范和主观世界观在预测这些认知中的作用。结果显示，跨文化的合作权力理论比强制权力理论总体上得到认可。然而，人们对权力的看法也存在文化差异。与强制性权力理论相比，中国受访者对合作权力理论的认同最为明显，而埃及和美国受访者则不那么明显。中介分析表明，这些差异主要是通过不那么危险的世界观，以及对面子和荣誉规范的更强认可来解释的。该研究为文化背景塑造个人世界观的不同方式提供了新颖的见解，这些世界观使强制与合作的权力和影响力途径合法化。它进一步完善了我们对文化逻辑的理解，超越了自我价值的含义，强调了它们与导航权力等级的相关性。

{"title":"Cultural differences in perceptions of power: A cultural logics perspective","authors":"Saïd Shafa , Jennifer R. Overbeck , Yoshihisa Kashima","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100249","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100249","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cross-cultural research has long recognized the significance of power relations and their outcomes for social interactions, yet little empirical work has explored this important construct in the context of the Cultural Logics framework. This study examined cultural differences in perceptions of collaborative versus coercive theories of power among members of dignity (USA), face (China), and honor (Egypt) cultures and considered the role of cultural norms as well as subjective worldviews in predicting those perceptions. Results showed overall endorsement of a collaborative theory of power over a coercive theory of power across cultures. Yet, there were also cultural differences in people’s perception of power. Agreement with a collaborative theory of power over a coercive theory of power was most pronounced among Chinese respondents and less evident among Egyptian and American respondents. Mediation analyses showed that these differences were mainly accounted for through less dangerous worldviews, as well as stronger endorsement of face and honor norms. The study provides novel insights into the different ways in which cultural contexts shape individual worldviews that legitimize coercive versus collaborative pathways to power and influence. It further refines our understanding of cultural logics beyond self-worth implications, highlighting their relevance for navigating power hierarchies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145362187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A historical psychology approach to gendered racial stereotypes: An examination of a multi-million book sample of 20th century texts 性别种族刻板印象的历史心理学方法：对数百万本20世纪文本样本的检查

IF 2.2

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100248

Joanna Schug , Monika Gosin , Nicholas P. Alt

Studies on intersectional invisibility and gendered race theory suggest that individuals whose identities are mismatched with widespread gendered racial stereotypes (i.e., Black women and East Asian men) face unique forms of discrimination in the form of representational invisibility. While previous research on gendered racial stereotypes has used experimental and laboratory-based paradigms to study the ways in which race and gender stereotypes intersect, this study applies a historical psychology lens to examine social representations using a large dataset of strings of text (“ngrams”) occurring in millions of English-language books published over 120 years. Consistent with hypotheses, we find that terms representing Black women and Asian men are generally less frequent than those referencing Black men and Asian women. Importantly, the magnitude of the race and gender terms changes over time, and the patterns of change correspond to social movements in the United States, suggesting that historical events such as the Civil Rights and Black Feminist movements may have impacted culturally widespread gendered race stereotypes.

交叉隐形和性别种族理论的研究表明，那些身份与普遍存在的性别种族刻板印象不匹配的个体（即黑人女性和东亚男性）面临着独特的歧视形式，即代表性隐形。先前关于性别种族刻板印象的研究使用实验和实验室为基础的范式来研究种族和性别刻板印象的交叉方式，而本研究使用历史心理学的视角来研究社会表征，使用120多年来出版的数百万本英语书籍中的文本字符串（“ngrams”）的大型数据集。与假设一致，我们发现代表黑人女性和亚洲男性的术语通常比指代黑人男性和亚洲女性的术语更少。重要的是，种族和性别术语的大小随着时间的推移而变化，变化的模式与美国的社会运动相对应，这表明民权运动和黑人女权运动等历史事件可能影响了文化上普遍存在的性别种族刻板印象。

{"title":"A historical psychology approach to gendered racial stereotypes: An examination of a multi-million book sample of 20th century texts","authors":"Joanna Schug , Monika Gosin , Nicholas P. Alt","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100248","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100248","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies on intersectional invisibility and gendered race theory suggest that individuals whose identities are mismatched with widespread gendered racial stereotypes (i.e., Black women and East Asian men) face unique forms of discrimination in the form of representational invisibility. While previous research on gendered racial stereotypes has used experimental and laboratory-based paradigms to study the ways in which race and gender stereotypes intersect, this study applies a historical psychology lens to examine social representations using a large dataset of strings of text (“ngrams”) occurring in millions of English-language books published over 120 years. Consistent with hypotheses, we find that terms representing Black women and Asian men are generally less frequent than those referencing Black men and Asian women. Importantly, the magnitude of the race and gender terms changes over time, and the patterns of change correspond to social movements in the United States, suggesting that historical events such as the Civil Rights and Black Feminist movements may have impacted culturally widespread gendered race stereotypes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145362188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rugged terrain and rigid hierarchy 地形崎岖，等级森严

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100220

Gen Tsudaka , Margaux N.A. Wienk , Jana B. Berkessel , Cynthia Boo

Human societies differ markedly in their endorsement of hierarchical authority, ranging from strict obedience to powerful leaders and militaries to more decentralized and egalitarian governance. Although cultural values have traditionally been used to explain this diversity, socioecological perspectives suggest that physical environments also shape collective orientations toward authority. The current research examines whether terrain ruggedness—the degree of elevational variability—predicts hierarchical preferences across large-scale contexts. In Study 1 (78 countries; N = 156,658), we combined cross-national survey data from the European Values Study/World Values Survey with digital elevation models. Results demonstrated that national preferences for military rule and for a strong leader (who bypasses democratic processes) were higher in countries with more rugged terrain, even after controlling for economic factors, demographic indices, and spatial autocorrelation. Study 2 (50 U.S. states; N = 336,491), using Gallup Poll data, replicated and extended these findings within the United States, revealing that states with greater terrain ruggedness exhibited a higher proportion of vertical (“boss-like”) supervisory relations, rather than egalitarian, collaborative (“partner-like”) styles. These convergent findings bolster socioecological models of person–environment fit and extend prior research linking geography and social cognition. By identifying terrain ruggedness as a robust predictor of hierarchical orientation at both national and subnational scales, this research highlights how ecological constraints can legitimize dominance-oriented leadership, while also suggesting that socioeconomic and cultural developments may moderate terrain’s influence on social dynamics. Future longitudinal and historical research is needed to clarify how environments and governance structures co-evolve, further illuminating the interplay between ecology, hierarchy, and social organization.

人类社会在对等级权威的认可上有明显的不同，从严格服从强大的领导人和军队到更加分散和平等的治理。虽然文化价值传统上被用来解释这种多样性，但社会生态学的观点表明，物理环境也塑造了集体对权威的取向。目前的研究考察了地形的崎岖度——海拔变化的程度——是否预测了大尺度环境下的等级偏好。在研究1中(78个国家；N = 156,658)，我们将来自欧洲价值观研究/世界价值观调查的跨国调查数据与数字高程模型相结合。结果表明，即使在控制了经济因素、人口指数和空间自相关性之后，在地形崎岖的国家，人们对军事统治和强势领导人（绕过民主程序）的偏好更高。研究2(美国50个州；N = 336,491)，利用盖洛普民意调查数据，在美国复制并扩展了这些发现，揭示了地形崎岖程度更高的州表现出更高比例的垂直（“老板式”）监督关系，而不是平等主义，合作（“伙伴式”）风格。这些趋同的发现支持了人与环境契合的社会生态学模型，并扩展了先前将地理与社会认知联系起来的研究。通过将地形崎岖度确定为国家和次国家尺度的等级取向的稳健预测因子，本研究强调了生态约束如何使优势导向的领导合法化，同时也表明社会经济和文化发展可能会缓和地形对社会动态的影响。未来的纵向和历史研究需要澄清环境和治理结构如何共同演变，进一步阐明生态、等级和社会组织之间的相互作用。

{"title":"Rugged terrain and rigid hierarchy","authors":"Gen Tsudaka , Margaux N.A. Wienk , Jana B. Berkessel , Cynthia Boo","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100220","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100220","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human societies differ markedly in their endorsement of hierarchical authority, ranging from strict obedience to powerful leaders and militaries to more decentralized and egalitarian governance. Although cultural values have traditionally been used to explain this diversity, socioecological perspectives suggest that physical environments also shape collective orientations toward authority. The current research examines whether terrain ruggedness—the degree of elevational variability—predicts hierarchical preferences across large-scale contexts. In Study 1 (78 countries; <em>N</em> = 156,658), we combined cross-national survey data from the European Values Study/World Values Survey with digital elevation models. Results demonstrated that national preferences for military rule and for a strong leader (who bypasses democratic processes) were higher in countries with more rugged terrain, even after controlling for economic factors, demographic indices, and spatial autocorrelation. Study 2 (50 U.S. states; <em>N</em> = 336,491), using Gallup Poll data, replicated and extended these findings within the United States, revealing that states with greater terrain ruggedness exhibited a higher proportion of vertical (“boss-like”) supervisory relations, rather than egalitarian, collaborative (“partner-like”) styles. These convergent findings bolster socioecological models of person–environment fit and extend prior research linking geography and social cognition. By identifying terrain ruggedness as a robust predictor of hierarchical orientation at both national and subnational scales, this research highlights how ecological constraints can legitimize dominance-oriented leadership, while also suggesting that socioeconomic and cultural developments may moderate terrain’s influence on social dynamics. Future longitudinal and historical research is needed to clarify how environments and governance structures co-evolve, further illuminating the interplay between ecology, hierarchy, and social organization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143873223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Real-time, subjective third-person experiences and psychiatric disorders in dignity, honor, and face cultures 实时的，主观的第三人称体验和尊严，荣誉和面子文化中的精神障碍

IF 2.2

Current research in ecological and social psychology

Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100250

Dov Cohen , Bryan CY Pang , Minjae Seo , Heidi H. Fu

Proceeding from the assumption that unusual experiences are sometimes extensions of the normal, we examine a rare phenomenological experience: namely, the real-time, subjective experience of being outside one’s body and looking at oneself as an outsider would. Both face and honor cultures place great emphasis on the self-as-seen-by-others. Thus, past research showed that taking an outsider’s perspective on the self is a more frequent experience in the memory imagery of those from honor cultures and in the memory imagery, mental models, and self-control experiences of those from face cultures, as compared to those from dignity cultures. Here we extrapolate from that past work and show that real-time, subjective out-of-body experiences of taking a third-person perspective on oneself – though unusual – are also found more among those from face and honor, as compared to dignity, cultures. Moreover, whereas such unusual third-person experiences were associated with a variety of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders for those from a dignity culture, they had no such relation to psychiatric maladies for those from a face culture. Among those from an honor culture, real-time third-person experiences were especially strongly associated with disorders involving reactive aggression, consistent with the need to respond forcefully to affronts in order to maintain one’s image in the eyes of others. Real-time third-person experiencing seems an extension of other ways cultures structure phenomenological experience, with implications (or lack thereof) for psychiatric disorders.

从不寻常的经历有时是正常的延伸的假设出发，我们研究了一种罕见的现象学经验：即，在一个人的身体之外的实时的，主观的经验，把自己当作一个局外人来看待。面子文化和荣誉文化都非常强调别人眼中的自我。因此，过去的研究表明，与来自尊严文化的人相比，在来自荣誉文化的人的记忆意象中，在来自面子文化的人的记忆意象、心理模型和自我控制体验中，以局外人的视角看待自我的体验更为频繁。在这里，我们从过去的研究中推断，并表明以第三人称视角看待自己的实时、主观的灵魂出窍体验——尽管不常见——也更多地出现在面子和荣誉文化中，而不是尊严文化中。此外，尽管这种不寻常的第三人称经历与来自尊严文化的人的各种DSM-IV精神疾病有关，但对于来自面子文化的人来说，它们与精神疾病没有这种关系。在那些来自荣誉文化的人当中，实时的第三人称体验与涉及反应性攻击的障碍有着特别强烈的联系，这与为了维护自己在他人眼中的形象而对冒犯做出强烈反应的需求是一致的。实时第三人称体验似乎是文化构建现象学体验的其他方式的延伸，具有（或缺乏）精神疾病的含义。

{"title":"Real-time, subjective third-person experiences and psychiatric disorders in dignity, honor, and face cultures","authors":"Dov Cohen , Bryan CY Pang , Minjae Seo , Heidi H. Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100250","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100250","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Proceeding from the assumption that unusual experiences are sometimes extensions of the normal, we examine a rare phenomenological experience: namely, the real-time, <em>subjective</em> experience of being outside one’s body and looking at oneself as an outsider would. Both face and honor cultures place great emphasis on the self-as-seen-by-others. Thus, past research showed that taking an outsider’s perspective on the self is a more frequent experience in the memory imagery of those from honor cultures and in the memory imagery, mental models, and self-control experiences of those from face cultures, as compared to those from dignity cultures. Here we extrapolate from that past work and show that real-time, subjective out-of-body experiences of taking a third-person perspective on oneself – though unusual – are also found more among those from face and honor, as compared to dignity, cultures. Moreover, whereas such unusual third-person experiences were associated with a variety of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders for those from a dignity culture, they had no such relation to psychiatric maladies for those from a face culture. Among those from an honor culture, real-time third-person experiences were especially strongly associated with disorders involving reactive aggression, consistent with the need to respond forcefully to affronts in order to maintain one’s image in the eyes of others. Real-time third-person experiencing seems an extension of other ways cultures structure phenomenological experience, with implications (or lack thereof) for psychiatric disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145424608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0