Variation in Sedative and Analgesic Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Outcomes

Justin M. Rucci MD , Anica C. Law MD , Scott Bolesta PharmD , Emily K. Quinn MA , Michael A. Garcia MD , Ognjen Gajic MD , Karen Boman , Santiago Yus MD , Valerie M. Goodspeed MPH , Vishakha Kumar MD, MBA , Rahul Kashyap MD, MBA , Allan J. Walkey MD
{"title":"Variation in Sedative and Analgesic Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Outcomes","authors":"Justin M. Rucci MD ,&nbsp;Anica C. Law MD ,&nbsp;Scott Bolesta PharmD ,&nbsp;Emily K. Quinn MA ,&nbsp;Michael A. Garcia MD ,&nbsp;Ognjen Gajic MD ,&nbsp;Karen Boman ,&nbsp;Santiago Yus MD ,&nbsp;Valerie M. Goodspeed MPH ,&nbsp;Vishakha Kumar MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Rahul Kashyap MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Allan J. Walkey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Providing analgesia and sedation is an essential component of caring for many mechanically ventilated patients. The selection of analgesic and sedative medications during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of these sedation practices on patient outcomes, remain incompletely characterized.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>What were the hospital patterns of analgesic and sedative use for patients with COVID-19 who received mechanical ventilation (MV), and what differences in clinical patient outcomes were observed across prevailing sedation practices?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>We conducted an observational cohort study of hospitalized adults who received MV for COVID-19 from February 2020 through April 2021 within the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) COVID-19 Registry. To describe common sedation practices, we used hierarchical clustering to group hospitals based on the percentage of patients who received various analgesic and sedative medications. We then used multivariable regression models to evaluate the association between hospital analgesia and sedation cluster and duration of MV (with a placement of death [POD] approach to account for competing risks).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 1,313 adults across 35 hospitals admitted with COVID-19 who received MV. Two clusters of analgesia and sedation practices were identified. Cluster 1 hospitals generally administered opioids and propofol with occasional use of additional sedatives (eg, benzodiazepines, alpha-agonists, and ketamine); cluster 2 hospitals predominantly used opioids and benzodiazepines without other sedatives. As compared with patients in cluster 2, patients admitted to cluster 1 hospitals underwent a shorter adjusted median duration of MV with POD (β-estimate, –5.9; 95% CI, –11.2 to –0.6; <em>P</em> = .03).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Patients who received MV for COVID-19 in hospitals that prioritized opioids and propofol for analgesia and sedation experienced shorter adjusted median duration of MV with POD as compared with patients who received MV in hospitals that primarily used opioids and benzodiazepines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000017/pdfft?md5=8e895c8170db059b221ca8fb8c0902c1&pid=1-s2.0-S2949788424000017-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Providing analgesia and sedation is an essential component of caring for many mechanically ventilated patients. The selection of analgesic and sedative medications during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the impact of these sedation practices on patient outcomes, remain incompletely characterized.

Research Question

What were the hospital patterns of analgesic and sedative use for patients with COVID-19 who received mechanical ventilation (MV), and what differences in clinical patient outcomes were observed across prevailing sedation practices?

Study Design and Methods

We conducted an observational cohort study of hospitalized adults who received MV for COVID-19 from February 2020 through April 2021 within the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS) COVID-19 Registry. To describe common sedation practices, we used hierarchical clustering to group hospitals based on the percentage of patients who received various analgesic and sedative medications. We then used multivariable regression models to evaluate the association between hospital analgesia and sedation cluster and duration of MV (with a placement of death [POD] approach to account for competing risks).

Results

We identified 1,313 adults across 35 hospitals admitted with COVID-19 who received MV. Two clusters of analgesia and sedation practices were identified. Cluster 1 hospitals generally administered opioids and propofol with occasional use of additional sedatives (eg, benzodiazepines, alpha-agonists, and ketamine); cluster 2 hospitals predominantly used opioids and benzodiazepines without other sedatives. As compared with patients in cluster 2, patients admitted to cluster 1 hospitals underwent a shorter adjusted median duration of MV with POD (β-estimate, –5.9; 95% CI, –11.2 to –0.6; P = .03).

Interpretation

Patients who received MV for COVID-19 in hospitals that prioritized opioids and propofol for analgesia and sedation experienced shorter adjusted median duration of MV with POD as compared with patients who received MV in hospitals that primarily used opioids and benzodiazepines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间镇静剂和止痛药使用的变化及相关结果
研究背景提供镇痛和镇静是护理许多机械通气患者的重要组成部分。研究问题对于接受机械通气(MV)的 COVID-19 患者,医院使用镇痛和镇静药物的模式是什么?研究设计和方法我们在重症医学学会病毒感染和呼吸道疾病普遍研究(VIRUS)COVID-19 登记处对 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 4 月期间因 COVID-19 而接受机械通气的住院成人进行了一项观察性队列研究。为了描述常见的镇静方法,我们根据接受各种镇痛和镇静药物治疗的患者比例,采用分层聚类的方法对医院进行分组。然后,我们使用多变量回归模型来评估医院镇痛和镇静分组与 MV 持续时间之间的关系(采用死亡安置 [POD] 方法来考虑竞争风险)。我们发现了两组镇痛和镇静方法。第 1 组医院一般使用阿片类药物和异丙酚,偶尔使用其他镇静剂(如苯二氮卓、α-激动剂和氯胺酮);第 2 组医院主要使用阿片类药物和苯二氮卓,不使用其他镇静剂。与第 2 组医院的患者相比,第 1 组医院收治的患者使用 POD 进行 MV 的调整后中位持续时间较短(β 估计值,-5.9;95% CI,-11.2 至 -0.6;P = .03)。解释与在主要使用阿片类药物和苯二氮卓的医院接受 MV 的患者相比,在优先使用阿片类药物和异丙酚镇痛和镇静的医院接受 COVID-19 MV 的患者使用 POD 进行 MV 的调整后中位持续时间较短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States Analytical Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitor in Adult Diabetic Ketoacidosis Silent Burdens Prevalence of Inpatient Pulse Oximetry in Operative and Nonoperative Settings Operationalizing the New Global Definition of ARDS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1