Operationalizing the New Global Definition of ARDS

George L. Anesi MD, MSCE, MBE , Arisha Ramkillawan MBChB , Jonathan Invernizzi MBBCh, MMed , Stella M. Savarimuthu MD , Robert D. Wise MBChB, MMed , Zane Farina MBChB , Michelle T.D. Smith MBChB, PhD
{"title":"Operationalizing the New Global Definition of ARDS","authors":"George L. Anesi MD, MSCE, MBE ,&nbsp;Arisha Ramkillawan MBChB ,&nbsp;Jonathan Invernizzi MBBCh, MMed ,&nbsp;Stella M. Savarimuthu MD ,&nbsp;Robert D. Wise MBChB, MMed ,&nbsp;Zane Farina MBChB ,&nbsp;Michelle T.D. Smith MBChB, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A proposed new global definition of ARDS seeks to update the Berlin definition and account for nonintubated ARDS and ARDS diagnoses in resource-variable settings.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>How do ARDS epidemiologic characteristics change with operationalizing the new global definition of ARDS in a resource-limited setting?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We performed a real-use retrospective cohort study among adult patients meeting criteria for the Berlin definition of ARDS or the global definition of ARDS at ICU admission in two public hospitals in the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health, South Africa, from January 2017 through June 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 5,760 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted to the ICU, 2,027 patients (35.2%) met at least one ARDS definition, including 1,218 patients meeting the Berlin definition of ARDS (60.1% of all ARDS diagnoses) and 809 new diagnoses of the global definition of ARDS that were not captured by the Berlin definition alone (39.9% of all ARDS diagnoses and 14.0% of all ICU admissions). After adjustment for hospital-level factors, patients who met only the global definition of ARDS criteria (ie, who would not have been captured by the Berlin definition) showed no statistically significant ICU mortality difference vs patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition (21.7% [95% CI, 18.9%-24.4%] vs 23.8% [95% CI, 21.5%-26.2%]; OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70-1.10]; <em>P</em> = .25). In prespecified exploratory subgroup analyses, patients without COVID-19 who met only the criteria for the global definition of ARDS showed reduced ICU mortality (14.2% [95% CI, 11.6%-16.9%] vs 22.2% [95% CI, 19.8%-24.6%]; OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45-0.75]; <em>P</em> &lt; .0005) compared with patients without COVID-19 who met the Berlin definition for ARDS.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The new global definition of ARDS captures a significant proportion of patients who would not have been included by the Berlin definition alone. These additional patients with ARDS may have heterogenous patterns of outcomes among diagnostic subgroups, including by COVID-19 status, compared with patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788424000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A proposed new global definition of ARDS seeks to update the Berlin definition and account for nonintubated ARDS and ARDS diagnoses in resource-variable settings.

Research Question

How do ARDS epidemiologic characteristics change with operationalizing the new global definition of ARDS in a resource-limited setting?

Study Design and Methods

We performed a real-use retrospective cohort study among adult patients meeting criteria for the Berlin definition of ARDS or the global definition of ARDS at ICU admission in two public hospitals in the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health, South Africa, from January 2017 through June 2022.

Results

Among 5,760 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted to the ICU, 2,027 patients (35.2%) met at least one ARDS definition, including 1,218 patients meeting the Berlin definition of ARDS (60.1% of all ARDS diagnoses) and 809 new diagnoses of the global definition of ARDS that were not captured by the Berlin definition alone (39.9% of all ARDS diagnoses and 14.0% of all ICU admissions). After adjustment for hospital-level factors, patients who met only the global definition of ARDS criteria (ie, who would not have been captured by the Berlin definition) showed no statistically significant ICU mortality difference vs patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition (21.7% [95% CI, 18.9%-24.4%] vs 23.8% [95% CI, 21.5%-26.2%]; OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70-1.10]; P = .25). In prespecified exploratory subgroup analyses, patients without COVID-19 who met only the criteria for the global definition of ARDS showed reduced ICU mortality (14.2% [95% CI, 11.6%-16.9%] vs 22.2% [95% CI, 19.8%-24.6%]; OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45-0.75]; P < .0005) compared with patients without COVID-19 who met the Berlin definition for ARDS.

Interpretation

The new global definition of ARDS captures a significant proportion of patients who would not have been included by the Berlin definition alone. These additional patients with ARDS may have heterogenous patterns of outcomes among diagnostic subgroups, including by COVID-19 status, compared with patients with ARDS according to the Berlin definition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
落实 ARDS 的新全球定义
研究背景ARDS的新全球定义旨在更新柏林定义,并考虑非插管ARDS和资源变化环境中的ARDS诊断。研究问题在资源有限的环境中,ARDS的流行病学特征如何随着ARDS新全球定义的实施而变化?研究设计和方法我们对2017年1月至2022年6月在南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省卫生部的两家公立医院ICU入院时符合柏林ARDS定义或全球ARDS定义标准的成年患者进行了实际使用的回顾性队列研究。结果在入住重症监护室的5760名成人(年龄≥18岁)中,有2027名患者(35.2%)符合至少一种ARDS定义,其中1218名患者符合ARDS的柏林定义(占所有ARDS诊断的60.1%),809名新诊断的ARDS全球定义未被柏林定义单独捕获(占所有ARDS诊断的39.9%,占所有ICU入院人数的14.0%)。在对医院层面的因素进行调整后,仅符合ARDS全球定义标准的患者(即柏林定义未涵盖的患者)与根据柏林定义诊断的ARDS患者相比,其ICU死亡率差异无统计学意义(21.7% [95% CI, 18.9%-24.4%] vs 23.8% [95% CI, 21.5%-26.2%]; OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70-1.10]; P = .25)。在预设的探索性亚组分析中,没有 COVID-19 且仅符合 ARDS 整体定义标准的患者 ICU 死亡率降低(14.2% [95% CI, 11.6%-16.9%] vs 22.2% [95% CI, 19.8%-24.6%]; OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45-0.释义ARDS的新全球定义捕获了很大一部分仅按照柏林定义无法纳入的患者。与根据柏林定义的 ARDS 患者相比,这些新增的 ARDS 患者在诊断亚组中可能会有不同的预后模式,包括 COVID-19 状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and Adaptation in COVID-19 Pandemic Posthospital Discharge Contact and Monitoring in the United States Silent Burdens Prevalence of Inpatient Pulse Oximetry in Operative and Nonoperative Settings Operationalizing the New Global Definition of ARDS Corrigendum to: Psomiadis JS, Khawaja A, Zimmerman J. CHEST Critical Care. 2023;1(3):100022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1