Mental health screening in refugees communities: Ukrainian refugees and their post-traumatic stress disorder specificities

Sandra Figueiredo , Allison Dierks , Rui Ferreira
{"title":"Mental health screening in refugees communities: Ukrainian refugees and their post-traumatic stress disorder specificities","authors":"Sandra Figueiredo ,&nbsp;Allison Dierks ,&nbsp;Rui Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms are often consequences of war conflicts that generate trauma in people, resulting from the loss of family, home and belonging. It is associated with the forced migration and lack of structured facilities or health professionals in the hosting country, as a result of varying degrees of clinical assessment and sociocultural intervention. To evaluate the lack of resources for refugees from Ukraine, as well for clinical and research purposes, this study examined the validity and psychometric properties of one Ukrainian adapted version of the PCL-5 (Check-List for PTSD) and the convergent validity for the four factor model of DSM-5 for PTSD. Varying reactions to war events and war zone characterization are among the variables expected to produce PTSD group differences in these refugees. Thus, PTSD was investigated in 77 Ukrainian refugees, who had resided in Portugal for a minimum of four weeks, and who answered the 20-item PCL-5 scored on a Likert scale. The PCL-5 revealed satisfactory convergent validity overall, and in the clusters of the four factor model, based on the DSM-5. Additionally, the role of the participants’ age, sex, education level, time of residence in the host country, and the average income before the russo-ukrainian war was evaluated. 34 of 77 met the criteria for PTSD with a good fit for the four factor model (as the original of DSM-5 for PTSD) after the Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA) was conducted. Mediating factors found for PTSD: female, young adults, high-income in Ukraine, low level of education, married, solo migration. Further investigation into factor modeling and clinical practice are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000061/pdfft?md5=ff56d4deda1030f541c95fea7ed90e71&pid=1-s2.0-S2468749924000061-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms are often consequences of war conflicts that generate trauma in people, resulting from the loss of family, home and belonging. It is associated with the forced migration and lack of structured facilities or health professionals in the hosting country, as a result of varying degrees of clinical assessment and sociocultural intervention. To evaluate the lack of resources for refugees from Ukraine, as well for clinical and research purposes, this study examined the validity and psychometric properties of one Ukrainian adapted version of the PCL-5 (Check-List for PTSD) and the convergent validity for the four factor model of DSM-5 for PTSD. Varying reactions to war events and war zone characterization are among the variables expected to produce PTSD group differences in these refugees. Thus, PTSD was investigated in 77 Ukrainian refugees, who had resided in Portugal for a minimum of four weeks, and who answered the 20-item PCL-5 scored on a Likert scale. The PCL-5 revealed satisfactory convergent validity overall, and in the clusters of the four factor model, based on the DSM-5. Additionally, the role of the participants’ age, sex, education level, time of residence in the host country, and the average income before the russo-ukrainian war was evaluated. 34 of 77 met the criteria for PTSD with a good fit for the four factor model (as the original of DSM-5 for PTSD) after the Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA) was conducted. Mediating factors found for PTSD: female, young adults, high-income in Ukraine, low level of education, married, solo migration. Further investigation into factor modeling and clinical practice are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
难民社区的心理健康筛查:乌克兰难民及其创伤后应激障碍的特殊性
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状往往是战争冲突的后果,战争冲突给人们造成了创伤,使他们失去了家庭、家园和归属感。创伤后应激障碍与被迫迁徙、收容国缺乏有组织的设施或医疗专业人员有关,这也是临床评估和社会文化干预程度不同的结果。为了评估乌克兰难民缺乏资源的情况,同时也为了临床和研究目的,本研究考察了PCL-5(创伤后应激障碍核对表)的一个乌克兰改编版本的有效性和心理测量特性,以及DSM-5创伤后应激障碍四因素模型的收敛有效性。对战争事件的不同反应和战区特征是预计会在这些难民中产生创伤后应激障碍群体差异的变量之一。因此,研究人员对 77 名乌克兰难民进行了创伤后应激障碍调查,这些难民在葡萄牙至少居住了四周,并回答了 20 个项目的 PCL-5 问卷,这些项目采用李克特量表评分。根据 DSM-5,PCL-5 的总体收敛有效性和四因素模型的聚类有效性均令人满意。此外,还对参与者的年龄、性别、教育水平、在东道国的居住时间以及俄乌战争前的平均收入进行了评估。在 77 人中,有 34 人符合创伤后应激障碍的标准,在进行确证因子分析(CFA)后,他们与四因子模型(DSM-5 中创伤后应激障碍的原型)的拟合度很高。创伤后应激障碍的中介因素包括:女性、青壮年、乌克兰高收入、低教育水平、已婚、独自移民。本文讨论了对因子模型的进一步研究和临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1