Comparison of accuracy between single posterior immediate and delayed implants placed using computer guided implant surgery and a digital laser printed surgical guide: A clinical investigation

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.033
Sankalp Mittal BDS, MDS , Pragati Kaurani BDS, MDS , Ritika Goyal BDS, MDS
{"title":"Comparison of accuracy between single posterior immediate and delayed implants placed using computer guided implant surgery and a digital laser printed surgical guide: A clinical investigation","authors":"Sankalp Mittal BDS, MDS ,&nbsp;Pragati Kaurani BDS, MDS ,&nbsp;Ritika Goyal BDS, MDS","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The congruence of surgical implant placement with the preplanned position is important for anatomic and prosthetic precision, minimal complications, and increased longevity. The influence of implant placement timing on the surgical deviations in single posterior implants is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this clinical study was to compare deviations between preplanned and single posterior immediate and delayed implants placed using computer-guided digital light processing (DLP) surgical guides fabricated using intraoral scanning and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div><span><span>Implant surgery was performed on 24 participants requiring single immediate or delayed implants in the posterior maxillary and mandibular regions, for which the surgical site data were obtained from CBCT and intraoral scanning. Subsequently, virtual implant planning and DLP surgical guides were fabricated. Preimplant and postimplant placement </span>CBCT scans were overlapped, and mean deviations for the immediate and delayed implant groups were calculated. The groups were compared with unpaired </span><em>t</em> tests (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 implants were placed, 12 in each group. In participants who received immediate implant placement, the mean ±standard deviation angular deviation, linear deviation at shoulder, linear deviation at apex, and vertical deviation were 1.03 ±0.70 degrees, 0.26 ±0.30 mm, 0.23 ±0.24 mm, and 0.39 ± 0.34 mm, respectively. In participants who received delayed implant treatment, the deviations were 0.53 ±0.60 degrees, 0.15 ±0.18 mm, 0.25 ±0.33 mm, and 0.17 ±0.10 mm, respectively. Significant differences between the 2 groups were found in the vertical deviation (<em>P</em>&lt;.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The timing of the single posterior placement was associated with different deviations in the vertical direction. All deviations obtained were below the recommended values. DLP surgical guides fabricated from intraoral and CBCT scans provided accurate implant placement in immediate and delayed single posterior implants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"134 4","pages":"Pages 1133-1139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391323008168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

The congruence of surgical implant placement with the preplanned position is important for anatomic and prosthetic precision, minimal complications, and increased longevity. The influence of implant placement timing on the surgical deviations in single posterior implants is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare deviations between preplanned and single posterior immediate and delayed implants placed using computer-guided digital light processing (DLP) surgical guides fabricated using intraoral scanning and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Material and methods

Implant surgery was performed on 24 participants requiring single immediate or delayed implants in the posterior maxillary and mandibular regions, for which the surgical site data were obtained from CBCT and intraoral scanning. Subsequently, virtual implant planning and DLP surgical guides were fabricated. Preimplant and postimplant placement CBCT scans were overlapped, and mean deviations for the immediate and delayed implant groups were calculated. The groups were compared with unpaired t tests (α=.05).

Results

A total of 24 implants were placed, 12 in each group. In participants who received immediate implant placement, the mean ±standard deviation angular deviation, linear deviation at shoulder, linear deviation at apex, and vertical deviation were 1.03 ±0.70 degrees, 0.26 ±0.30 mm, 0.23 ±0.24 mm, and 0.39 ± 0.34 mm, respectively. In participants who received delayed implant treatment, the deviations were 0.53 ±0.60 degrees, 0.15 ±0.18 mm, 0.25 ±0.33 mm, and 0.17 ±0.10 mm, respectively. Significant differences between the 2 groups were found in the vertical deviation (P<.05).

Conclusions

The timing of the single posterior placement was associated with different deviations in the vertical direction. All deviations obtained were below the recommended values. DLP surgical guides fabricated from intraoral and CBCT scans provided accurate implant placement in immediate and delayed single posterior implants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用计算机辅助种植手术和数字激光打印手术指南植入单后即刻种植体和延迟种植体的准确性比较:临床研究
问题陈述手术种植体植入与预规划位置的一致性对于解剖和修复的精确性、并发症的最小化和寿命的延长非常重要。本临床研究的目的是比较使用口内扫描和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)制作的计算机辅助数字光处理(DLP)手术导板植入的预计划种植体和单后即刻种植体与延迟植入种植体之间的偏差。材料和方法对 24 名需要在上颌和下颌后部进行单个即刻或延迟种植体植入的参与者进行了种植手术,手术部位数据来自 CBCT 和口内扫描。随后,制作了虚拟种植规划和 DLP 手术导板。将种植前和种植后的 CBCT 扫描重叠,计算即刻种植组和延迟种植组的平均偏差。各组之间的比较采用非配对 t 检验(α=.05)。在接受即刻种植的患者中,角偏差、肩部线性偏差、顶点线性偏差和垂直偏差的平均值(±标准偏差)分别为 1.03 ±0.70 度、0.26 ±0.30 毫米、0.23 ±0.24 毫米和 0.39 ± 0.34 毫米。在接受延迟种植治疗的参与者中,偏差分别为 0.53 ±0.60 度、0.15 ±0.18 毫米、0.25 ±0.33 毫米和 0.17 ±0.10 毫米。两组患者的垂直偏差存在显著差异(P<.05)。所有偏差均低于推荐值。根据口内扫描和 CBCT 扫描结果制作的 DLP 手术导板可以为即刻和延迟单后牙种植提供准确的种植体植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
U-Net-based deep learning architecture for automated CBCT segmentation of the mandibular canal in dental implant treatment planning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Historical perspectives and global trends on the use of obturators in dentistry: A bibliometric review. Comparative agreement among traditional, digital, and experimental AI-based shade selection methods in dentistry: A clinical study. Skin viscoelasticity as a predictor of optimal facial prosthesis design using 4D facial expression modeling. Properties of 3D printed resins for definitive dental restorations: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1