The Role of the Reluctant Harbinger in Arden of Faversham and A Woman Killed with Kindness

Joseph L. Kelly
{"title":"The Role of the Reluctant Harbinger in Arden of Faversham and A Woman Killed with Kindness","authors":"Joseph L. Kelly","doi":"10.1353/sli.2021.a917130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Role of the Reluctant Harbinger in <em>Arden of Faversham</em> and <em>A Woman Killed with Kindness</em> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Joseph L. Kelly (bio) </li> </ul> <p><em>Arden of Faversham</em> (Anonymous 1592) and <em>A Woman Killed with Kindness</em> (Thomas Heywood 1607), two very different plays that exemplify the distinctive sub-genre of “domestic tragedy,” both feature a unique supporting role, each of which serves a similar purpose—that of a reluctant harbinger.</p> <p>In the respective plays, each serves the household of a country gentleman. The one, Thomas Arden’s personal friend and counselor on the trip to London, Franklin. The other is Master John Frankford’s manservant, Nicholas. Soon after the plays begin, both counselor and manservant find themselves thrust into unexpectedly onerous dilemmas, chiefly pertaining to the infidelity of the respective gentlemen’s wives with a household rival. Both voluntarily but reluctantly engage the seemingly bootless effort to inform and protect either the insouciant friend or disbelieving master, as the case may be.</p> <p>Largely invented, neither role as written appears in the source material, nor do other domestic tragedies of the period feature roles that similarly augur disguised ill for the principal character.<sup>1</sup> Critical commentators tend to treat the roles as primarily incidental to the plot and ancillary to the main characters’ actions rather than as influential agents, serving simply as instruments for commentary on the action rather than as plot participants.<sup>2</sup> That the role stands apart, even aloof, from the plays’ other characters allows each to maintain a close, informed, and conflict-free relationship with the master of the established provincial household. This, in turn, lends a measure of audience credibility with which to serve as commentator and confidant to reinforce moments of anticipation and irony in the unfolding dramatic plot.</p> <p>Thus, I argue that these seemingly forgotten characters uniquely serve the narrative of either play as an often compromised front line of defense for the greater household, as well as a crucial plot device, that strengthens these respective plays’ immediate audience impact as well as their enduring theatrical influence. Franklin, despite his frequent but unheeded <strong>[End Page 23]</strong> warnings, fails to prevent his friend Arden’s murder conspired by his wife Alice and her lover Mosby. Yet, in the end, despite his reluctance along the way, Franklin becomes the play’s essential instrument of final justice and retribution. Nicholas, the manservant, reluctantly reveals a solely witnessed affair between his master’s wife and her lover Wendoll in <em>Woman Killed</em>. His discovery and disclosure initiate the cascade of events that drive the play’s climax and conclusion.</p> <h2>I</h2> <p>I presented this paper at the Death and Domesticity Conference in the fall of 2018. A wide variety of distinguished scholars gathered for the rare opportunity to share their scholarly enthusiasm for that distinctive subgroup of late sixteenth and early seventeenth-century tragic drama known as “domestic tragedy,” the significance and influence of which too often sits unrecognized within the rich theatrical history of the time. Domestic tragedy diverged in subject matter from the customary focus on legend, history, wealth, and nobility to contemporary, personal, and family relationships within land-owning household enterprises. H. H. Adams first distinguished these plays in his 1943 study <em>English Domestic or Homiletic Tragedy, 1575–1642</em>. Adams’s definition yet remains a durable starting point from which to collectively situate these enduring milestones of early English drama.</p> <p>The subtitle of Adams’s foregoing treatise declares it “an Account of the Development of the Tragedy of the Common Man, showing the Great Dependence on Religious Morality, illustrated with striking examples of the Interposition of Providence for the Amendment of Men’s Manners.” That is, after the fashion of a homily, the playwright constructs the domestic tragedy as a “moral demonstration [at every stage of which] the hand of Providence can be discerned” (Adams 103).</p> <p>At the center of two full days of oral conference essay presentations stood full-length stage productions of two classic domestic tragedies presented by the Resurgens Theatre Company—<em>Arden of Faversham</em> and <em>A Woman Killed with Kindness</em>. The Conference specifically chose these plays as not only distinguished examples of the genre, but those that illustrate Adams’s claim for the homiletic nature of domestic tragedy.</p> <p>However, I...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":501368,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sli.2021.a917130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • The Role of the Reluctant Harbinger in Arden of Faversham and A Woman Killed with Kindness
  • Joseph L. Kelly (bio)

Arden of Faversham (Anonymous 1592) and A Woman Killed with Kindness (Thomas Heywood 1607), two very different plays that exemplify the distinctive sub-genre of “domestic tragedy,” both feature a unique supporting role, each of which serves a similar purpose—that of a reluctant harbinger.

In the respective plays, each serves the household of a country gentleman. The one, Thomas Arden’s personal friend and counselor on the trip to London, Franklin. The other is Master John Frankford’s manservant, Nicholas. Soon after the plays begin, both counselor and manservant find themselves thrust into unexpectedly onerous dilemmas, chiefly pertaining to the infidelity of the respective gentlemen’s wives with a household rival. Both voluntarily but reluctantly engage the seemingly bootless effort to inform and protect either the insouciant friend or disbelieving master, as the case may be.

Largely invented, neither role as written appears in the source material, nor do other domestic tragedies of the period feature roles that similarly augur disguised ill for the principal character.1 Critical commentators tend to treat the roles as primarily incidental to the plot and ancillary to the main characters’ actions rather than as influential agents, serving simply as instruments for commentary on the action rather than as plot participants.2 That the role stands apart, even aloof, from the plays’ other characters allows each to maintain a close, informed, and conflict-free relationship with the master of the established provincial household. This, in turn, lends a measure of audience credibility with which to serve as commentator and confidant to reinforce moments of anticipation and irony in the unfolding dramatic plot.

Thus, I argue that these seemingly forgotten characters uniquely serve the narrative of either play as an often compromised front line of defense for the greater household, as well as a crucial plot device, that strengthens these respective plays’ immediate audience impact as well as their enduring theatrical influence. Franklin, despite his frequent but unheeded [End Page 23] warnings, fails to prevent his friend Arden’s murder conspired by his wife Alice and her lover Mosby. Yet, in the end, despite his reluctance along the way, Franklin becomes the play’s essential instrument of final justice and retribution. Nicholas, the manservant, reluctantly reveals a solely witnessed affair between his master’s wife and her lover Wendoll in Woman Killed. His discovery and disclosure initiate the cascade of events that drive the play’s climax and conclusion.

I

I presented this paper at the Death and Domesticity Conference in the fall of 2018. A wide variety of distinguished scholars gathered for the rare opportunity to share their scholarly enthusiasm for that distinctive subgroup of late sixteenth and early seventeenth-century tragic drama known as “domestic tragedy,” the significance and influence of which too often sits unrecognized within the rich theatrical history of the time. Domestic tragedy diverged in subject matter from the customary focus on legend, history, wealth, and nobility to contemporary, personal, and family relationships within land-owning household enterprises. H. H. Adams first distinguished these plays in his 1943 study English Domestic or Homiletic Tragedy, 1575–1642. Adams’s definition yet remains a durable starting point from which to collectively situate these enduring milestones of early English drama.

The subtitle of Adams’s foregoing treatise declares it “an Account of the Development of the Tragedy of the Common Man, showing the Great Dependence on Religious Morality, illustrated with striking examples of the Interposition of Providence for the Amendment of Men’s Manners.” That is, after the fashion of a homily, the playwright constructs the domestic tragedy as a “moral demonstration [at every stage of which] the hand of Providence can be discerned” (Adams 103).

At the center of two full days of oral conference essay presentations stood full-length stage productions of two classic domestic tragedies presented by the Resurgens Theatre Company—Arden of Faversham and A Woman Killed with Kindness. The Conference specifically chose these plays as not only distinguished examples of the genre, but those that illustrate Adams’s claim for the homiletic nature of domestic tragedy.

However, I...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法弗沙姆的阿登》和《一个被善良杀死的女人》中不情愿的预言家的角色
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 法弗舍姆的《阿登》和《一个被仁慈杀死的女人》中不情愿的预兆者的角色 约瑟夫-L-凯利(简历 法弗舍姆的《阿登》(无名氏,1592 年)和《一个被仁慈杀死的女人》(托马斯-海伍德,1607 年)是两部风格迥异的戏剧,体现了 "家庭悲剧 "这一独特的次类型。在这两部剧中,每个人都为一位乡绅的家庭服务。一个是托马斯-阿登的私人朋友兼伦敦之行的顾问富兰克林。另一位是约翰-弗兰克福德老爷的男仆尼古拉斯。戏剧开始后不久,顾问和男仆都发现自己陷入了意想不到的繁重困境,主要是各自的妻子对家中的情敌不忠。两人都自愿但又不情愿地参与到看似徒劳无功的工作中,视情况告知并保护漠不关心的朋友或不相信的主人。1 评论家倾向于将这些角色主要视为情节的附带品和主要人物行动的辅助品,而不是有影响力的媒介,只是作为评论行动的工具,而不是情节的参与者2。角色与剧中其他人物的关系是独立的,甚至是冷漠的,这使得每个角色都能与外省家庭的主人保持密切、知情和无冲突的关系。反过来,这也为观众提供了一定程度的可信度,使其能够充当评论员和知己,加强戏剧情节发展中的期待和讽刺时刻。因此,我认为这些看似被遗忘的人物在这两部戏剧的叙事中发挥着独特的作用,他们往往是大户人家妥协的前线防线,也是关键的情节设置,加强了这两部戏剧对观众的直接影响和持久的戏剧影响力。尽管富兰克林经常发出警告,但却无人理睬 [第23页完] ,他未能阻止妻子爱丽丝和情人莫斯比合谋杀害他的朋友阿登。然而,尽管富兰克林一路上并不情愿,但最终他还是成为了剧中伸张正义和报应的重要工具。在《被杀死的女人》中,男仆尼古拉斯不情愿地揭露了主人的妻子与情人温多尔之间的私情。他的发现和揭露引发了一连串的事件,推动了该剧的高潮和结局。2018年秋天,我在 "死亡与家庭"(Death and Domesticity)会议上发表了这篇论文。众多杰出的学者齐聚一堂,借此难得的机会分享他们对十六世纪末和十七世纪初悲剧戏剧中被称为 "家庭悲剧 "的独特亚群的学术热情,在当时丰富的戏剧史中,"家庭悲剧 "的意义和影响往往不被认可。家庭悲剧的题材不同于传统意义上的传奇、历史、财富和贵族,而是以土地所有者家庭企业中的当代、个人和家庭关系为主题。H. H. 亚当斯在其 1943 年的研究《1575-1642 年英国家庭或家庭悲剧》中首次对这些戏剧进行了区分。亚当斯的定义仍然是一个持久的起点,我们可以从这个起点出发,共同定位这些早期英国戏剧中经久不衰的里程碑。亚当斯前述论文的副标题宣称,该论文 "叙述了普通人悲剧的发展过程,显示了对宗教道德的极大依赖,并以天意干预修正人们行为举例说明"。也就是说,剧作家以讲道的方式,将家庭悲剧构建为 "道德展示,[在每一个阶段]都能看到天意之手"(亚当斯 103)。在为期两天的大会口头论文演讲中,由 Resurgens 剧团演出的两部经典家庭悲剧--《法弗沙姆的阿登》和《一个被善良杀死的女人》--的长篇舞台剧成为中心。会议特别选择了这两部剧作,因为它们不仅是这一体裁的杰出典范,也是亚当斯主张家庭悲剧具有说教性质的剧作。然而,我...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Student-Friendly Editions—a Pedagogical and Scholarly Experiment with A Warning for Fair Women Fair Women, Red Hands, Black Will(s): Domestic Tragedy's Racial Logic Inside Out: Early Modern Domestic Tragedy and the Dramaturgy of Extrusion Death and Domesticity: Reassessing Domestic Dramas of the Renaissance Finding Her Conscience: Auditing Female Confession in A Warning for Fair Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1