James Eills , Marc Azagra , David Gómez-Cabeza , Michael C.D. Tayler , Irene Marco-Rius
{"title":"Polarization losses from the nonadiabatic passage of hyperpolarized solutions through metallic components","authors":"James Eills , Marc Azagra , David Gómez-Cabeza , Michael C.D. Tayler , Irene Marco-Rius","doi":"10.1016/j.jmro.2023.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>From complex-mixture analysis to in vivo molecular imaging, applications of liquid-state nuclear spin hyperpolarization have expanded widely over recent years. In most cases, hyperpolarized solutions are generated ex situ and transported from the polarization instrument to the measurement device. The sample hyperpolarization usually survives this transport, since the changes in magnetic fields that are external to the sample are typically adiabatic (slow) with respect to the internal nuclear spin dynamics. The passage of polarized samples through weakly magnetic components such as stainless steel syringe needles and ferrules is not always adiabatic, which can lead to near-complete destruction of the magnetization. To avoid this effect becoming “folklore” in the field of hyperpolarized NMR, we present a systematic investigation to highlight the problem and investigate possible solutions. Experiments were carried out on: (i) dissolution-DNP-polarized [1-<sup>13</sup>C]pyruvate with NMR detection at 1.4<!--> <!-->T, and (ii) 1.5-T-polarized H<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>O with NMR detection at 2.5<!--> <span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>T. We show that the degree of adiabaticity of solutions passing through metal parts is intrinsically unpredictable, likely depending on many factors such as solution flow rate, degree of remanent ferromagnetism in the metal, and nuclear spin species. However, the magnetization destruction effects can be suppressed by application of an external field on the order of 0.1–10<!--> <!-->mT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":365,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6240,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666441023000523/pdfft?md5=6c568ae307db77ec0587611f192e7126&pid=1-s2.0-S2666441023000523-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Open","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666441023000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
From complex-mixture analysis to in vivo molecular imaging, applications of liquid-state nuclear spin hyperpolarization have expanded widely over recent years. In most cases, hyperpolarized solutions are generated ex situ and transported from the polarization instrument to the measurement device. The sample hyperpolarization usually survives this transport, since the changes in magnetic fields that are external to the sample are typically adiabatic (slow) with respect to the internal nuclear spin dynamics. The passage of polarized samples through weakly magnetic components such as stainless steel syringe needles and ferrules is not always adiabatic, which can lead to near-complete destruction of the magnetization. To avoid this effect becoming “folklore” in the field of hyperpolarized NMR, we present a systematic investigation to highlight the problem and investigate possible solutions. Experiments were carried out on: (i) dissolution-DNP-polarized [1-13C]pyruvate with NMR detection at 1.4 T, and (ii) 1.5-T-polarized HO with NMR detection at 2.5 T. We show that the degree of adiabaticity of solutions passing through metal parts is intrinsically unpredictable, likely depending on many factors such as solution flow rate, degree of remanent ferromagnetism in the metal, and nuclear spin species. However, the magnetization destruction effects can be suppressed by application of an external field on the order of 0.1–10 mT.