Dosimetry and treatment efficiency of SBRT using TaiChiB radiotherapy system for two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/XST-230176
Yanhua Duan, Aihui Feng, Hao Wang, Hua Chen, Hengle Gu, Yan Shao, Ying Huang, Zhenjiong Shen, Qing Kong, Zhiyong Xu
{"title":"Dosimetry and treatment efficiency of SBRT using TaiChiB radiotherapy system for two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk.","authors":"Yanhua Duan, Aihui Feng, Hao Wang, Hua Chen, Hengle Gu, Yan Shao, Ying Huang, Zhenjiong Shen, Qing Kong, Zhiyong Xu","doi":"10.3233/XST-230176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to assess the dosimetry and treatment efficiency of TaiChiB-based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) plans applying to treat two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For four retrospective patients diagnosed with two-lung lesions each patient, four treatment plans were designed including Plan Edge, TaiChiB linac-based, RGS-based, and a linac-RGS hybrid (Plan TCLinac, Plan TCRGS, and Plan TCHybrid). Dosimetric metrics and beam-on time were employed to evaluate and compare the TaiChiB-based plans against Plan Edge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Conformity Index (CI), Plan TCRGS outperformed all other plans with an average CI of 1.06, as opposed to Plan Edge's 1.33. Similarly, for R50 %, Plan TCRGS was superior with an average R50 % of 3.79, better than Plan Edge's 4.28. In terms of D2 cm, Plan TCRGS also led with an average of 48.48%, compared to Plan Edge's 56.25%. For organ at risk (OAR) sparing, Plan TCRGS often displayed the lowest dosimetric values, notably for the spinal cord (Dmax 5.92 Gy) and lungs (D1500cc 1.00 Gy, D1000cc 2.61 Gy, V10 Gy 15.14%). However, its high Dmax values for the heart and great vessels sometimes exceeded safety thresholds. Plan TCHybrid presented a balanced approach, showing doses comparable to or better than Plan Edge without crossing safety limits. In terms of beam-on time, Plan TCLinac emerged as the most efficient treatment option in three out of four cases, followed closely by Plan Edge in one case. Plan TCRGS, despite its dosimetric advantages, was the least efficient, recording notably longer beam-on times, with a peak at 33.28 minutes in Case 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients with two-lung lesions treated by SBRT whose one lesion overlaps with OARs, the Plan TCHybrid delivered by TaiChiB digital radiotherapy system can be recommended as a clinical option.</p>","PeriodicalId":49948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"379-394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/XST-230176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the dosimetry and treatment efficiency of TaiChiB-based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) plans applying to treat two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk.

Methods: For four retrospective patients diagnosed with two-lung lesions each patient, four treatment plans were designed including Plan Edge, TaiChiB linac-based, RGS-based, and a linac-RGS hybrid (Plan TCLinac, Plan TCRGS, and Plan TCHybrid). Dosimetric metrics and beam-on time were employed to evaluate and compare the TaiChiB-based plans against Plan Edge.

Results: For Conformity Index (CI), Plan TCRGS outperformed all other plans with an average CI of 1.06, as opposed to Plan Edge's 1.33. Similarly, for R50 %, Plan TCRGS was superior with an average R50 % of 3.79, better than Plan Edge's 4.28. In terms of D2 cm, Plan TCRGS also led with an average of 48.48%, compared to Plan Edge's 56.25%. For organ at risk (OAR) sparing, Plan TCRGS often displayed the lowest dosimetric values, notably for the spinal cord (Dmax 5.92 Gy) and lungs (D1500cc 1.00 Gy, D1000cc 2.61 Gy, V10 Gy 15.14%). However, its high Dmax values for the heart and great vessels sometimes exceeded safety thresholds. Plan TCHybrid presented a balanced approach, showing doses comparable to or better than Plan Edge without crossing safety limits. In terms of beam-on time, Plan TCLinac emerged as the most efficient treatment option in three out of four cases, followed closely by Plan Edge in one case. Plan TCRGS, despite its dosimetric advantages, was the least efficient, recording notably longer beam-on times, with a peak at 33.28 minutes in Case 2.

Conclusion: For patients with two-lung lesions treated by SBRT whose one lesion overlaps with OARs, the Plan TCHybrid delivered by TaiChiB digital radiotherapy system can be recommended as a clinical option.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用TaiChiB放射治疗系统进行SBRT治疗双肺病变(有一个重叠的危险器官)的剂量测定和治疗效率。
目的:本研究旨在评估基于TaiChiB的立体定向体外放射治疗(SBRT)计划在治疗双肺病变时的剂量测量和治疗效率:方法:针对四名被诊断为双肺病变的回顾性患者,设计了四种治疗方案,包括Plan Edge、基于TaiChiB直列加速器、基于RGS和直列加速器-RGS混合方案(Plan TCLinac、Plan TCRGS和Plan TCHybrid)。采用剂量测定指标和光束开启时间来评估和比较基于 TaiChiB 的计划与 Plan Edge 计划:结果:在一致性指数(CI)方面,Plan TCRGS 的平均 CI 为 1.06,优于 Plan Edge 的 1.33。同样,就 R50 % 而言,TCRGS 方案更胜一筹,平均 R50 % 为 3.79,优于 Edge 方案的 4.28。在 D2 cm 方面,Plan TCRGS 也领先,平均为 48.48%,而 Plan Edge 为 56.25%。对于风险器官(OAR)的保留,Plan TCRGS 通常显示出最低的剂量值,尤其是脊髓(Dmax 5.92 Gy)和肺部(D1500cc 1.00 Gy,D1000cc 2.61 Gy,V10 Gy 15.14%)。不过,其心脏和大血管的高 Dmax 值有时会超过安全阈值。Plan TCHybrid 采用了一种平衡的方法,显示的剂量与 Plan Edge 相当或更好,但没有超过安全限值。就光束照射时间而言,TCLinac 计划在四个病例中的三个病例中成为最有效的治疗方案,Edge 计划紧随其后。尽管 Plan TCRGS 在剂量学方面具有优势,但其效率最低,光束照射时间明显较长,在病例 2 中达到 33.28 分钟的峰值:结论:对于采用 SBRT 治疗双肺病灶且其中一个病灶与 OARs 重叠的患者,可以推荐使用由 TaiChiB 数字放射治疗系统提供的 Plan TCHybrid 作为临床选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
23.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Research areas within the scope of the journal include: Interaction of x-rays with matter: x-ray phenomena, biological effects of radiation, radiation safety and optical constants X-ray sources: x-rays from synchrotrons, x-ray lasers, plasmas, and other sources, conventional or unconventional Optical elements: grazing incidence optics, multilayer mirrors, zone plates, gratings, other diffraction optics Optical instruments: interferometers, spectrometers, microscopes, telescopes, microprobes
期刊最新文献
Industrial digital radiographic image denoising based on improved KBNet. Research on the effectiveness of multi-view slice correction strategy based on deep learning in high pitch helical CT reconstruction. A fully linearized ADMM algorithm for optimization based image reconstruction. A reconstruction method for ptychography based on residual dense network. Can AI generate diagnostic reports for radiologist approval on CXR images? A multi-reader and multi-case observer performance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1