Differences between the true reproduction number and the apparent reproduction number of an epidemic time series

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Epidemics Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100742
Oliver Eales , Steven Riley
{"title":"Differences between the true reproduction number and the apparent reproduction number of an epidemic time series","authors":"Oliver Eales ,&nbsp;Steven Riley","doi":"10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The time-varying reproduction number <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> measures the number of new infections per infectious individual and is closely correlated with the time series of infection incidence by definition. The timings of actual infections are rarely known, and analysis of epidemics usually relies on time series data for other outcomes such as symptom onset. A common implicit assumption, when estimating <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> from an epidemic time series, is that <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> has the same relationship with these downstream outcomes as it does with the time series of incidence. However, this assumption is unlikely to be valid given that most epidemic time series are not perfect proxies of incidence. Rather they represent convolutions of incidence with uncertain delay distributions. Here we define the apparent time-varying reproduction number, <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span>, the reproduction number calculated from a downstream epidemic time series and demonstrate how differences between <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span> depend on the convolution function. The mean of the convolution function sets a time offset between the two signals, whilst the variance of the convolution function introduces a relative distortion between them. We present the convolution functions of epidemic time series that were available during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Infection prevalence, measured by random sampling studies, presents fewer biases than other epidemic time series. Here we show that additionally the mean and variance of its convolution function were similar to that obtained from traditional surveillance based on mass-testing and could be reduced using more frequent testing, or by using stricter thresholds for positivity. Infection prevalence studies continue to be a versatile tool for tracking the temporal trends of <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>t</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span>, and with additional refinements to their study protocol, will be of even greater utility during any future epidemics or pandemics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49206,"journal":{"name":"Epidemics","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100742"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436524000033/pdfft?md5=53225f2009ee336d61b5ff4d2797f64e&pid=1-s2.0-S1755436524000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755436524000033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The time-varying reproduction number R(t) measures the number of new infections per infectious individual and is closely correlated with the time series of infection incidence by definition. The timings of actual infections are rarely known, and analysis of epidemics usually relies on time series data for other outcomes such as symptom onset. A common implicit assumption, when estimating R(t) from an epidemic time series, is that R(t) has the same relationship with these downstream outcomes as it does with the time series of incidence. However, this assumption is unlikely to be valid given that most epidemic time series are not perfect proxies of incidence. Rather they represent convolutions of incidence with uncertain delay distributions. Here we define the apparent time-varying reproduction number, RA(t), the reproduction number calculated from a downstream epidemic time series and demonstrate how differences between RA(t) and R(t) depend on the convolution function. The mean of the convolution function sets a time offset between the two signals, whilst the variance of the convolution function introduces a relative distortion between them. We present the convolution functions of epidemic time series that were available during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Infection prevalence, measured by random sampling studies, presents fewer biases than other epidemic time series. Here we show that additionally the mean and variance of its convolution function were similar to that obtained from traditional surveillance based on mass-testing and could be reduced using more frequent testing, or by using stricter thresholds for positivity. Infection prevalence studies continue to be a versatile tool for tracking the temporal trends of R(t), and with additional refinements to their study protocol, will be of even greater utility during any future epidemics or pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病时间序列的真实繁殖数与表观繁殖数之间的差异
时变繁殖数 R(t) 衡量每个感染个体新感染的数量,根据定义,它与感染发病率的时间序列密切相关。实际感染的时间很少为人所知,对流行病的分析通常依赖于其他结果(如症状出现)的时间序列数据。在根据流行病时间序列估计 R(t) 时,一个常见的隐含假设是 R(t) 与这些下游结果的关系与它与发病率时间序列的关系相同。然而,鉴于大多数流行病时间序列并不是发病率的完美替代物,这一假设不太可能成立。相反,它们代表了发病率与不确定延迟分布的卷积。在此,我们定义了表观时变繁殖数 RA(t),即从下游流行病时间序列计算出的繁殖数,并展示了 RA(t) 和 R(t) 之间的差异如何取决于卷积函数。卷积函数的均值设定了两个信号之间的时间偏移,而卷积函数的方差则在两个信号之间引入了相对失真。我们介绍了 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间流行病时间序列的卷积函数。与其他流行病时间序列相比,通过随机抽样研究测量的感染率偏差较小。我们在此表明,此外,其卷积函数的均值和方差与基于大规模检测的传统监测所获得的均值和方差相似,可以通过增加检测频率或使用更严格的阳性阈值来减少偏差。感染率研究仍然是跟踪 R(t) 时间趋势的多功能工具,随着研究方案的进一步完善,它在未来的流行病或大流行中将发挥更大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemics
Epidemics INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
140 days
期刊介绍: Epidemics publishes papers on infectious disease dynamics in the broadest sense. Its scope covers both within-host dynamics of infectious agents and dynamics at the population level, particularly the interaction between the two. Areas of emphasis include: spread, transmission, persistence, implications and population dynamics of infectious diseases; population and public health as well as policy aspects of control and prevention; dynamics at the individual level; interaction with the environment, ecology and evolution of infectious diseases, as well as population genetics of infectious agents.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the generation time for influenza transmission using household data in the United States. Reconstructing the first COVID-19 pandemic wave with minimal data in England. Retrospective modelling of the disease and mortality burden of the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Zurich, Switzerland. Flusion: Integrating multiple data sources for accurate influenza predictions. Infectious diseases: Household modeling with missing data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1