Spinal Anesthesia Prior to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Resulted in Decreased Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use.

Kaitlin A Warta, Xiaoyin Lu, Tam D Nguyen, Robert M Shakar, Todd M Beste
{"title":"Spinal Anesthesia Prior to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Resulted in Decreased Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use.","authors":"Kaitlin A Warta, Xiaoyin Lu, Tam D Nguyen, Robert M Shakar, Todd M Beste","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2023.00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To determine if a pre-operative morphine/bupivacaine spinal injection prior to laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced postoperative pain and resulted in less opioid consumption during the hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2) was conducted at a single institution regional referral center (community hospital) in North Carolina. Three hundred nineteen patients met criteria for inclusion: 192 received spinal anesthesia and 127 did not. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Median pain scores were significantly lower in the treatment than the control group on day of surgery (DOS) (2 vs. 6; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and postoperative day 1 (POD1) (2 vs. 4; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary outcomes were pain scores on DOS and POD1 and inpatient opioid use. Pain scores were obtained using the 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale. Opioids were converted to oral morphine milliequivalents (OME). Median opioid use was also significantly lower in the treatment than the control group on DOS (0 vs. 15.00 OME; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and POD1 (0 vs. 7.5 OME; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Median length of stay between the groups was not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-operative morphine spinal injection for laparoscopic hysterectomy led to significantly lower pain scores and inpatient opioid consumption. Pre-operative spinal anesthesia for benign laparoscopic hysterectomy appears helpful for enhancing the postoperative experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2023.00050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: To determine if a pre-operative morphine/bupivacaine spinal injection prior to laparoscopic hysterectomy reduced postoperative pain and resulted in less opioid consumption during the hospital stay.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2) was conducted at a single institution regional referral center (community hospital) in North Carolina. Three hundred nineteen patients met criteria for inclusion: 192 received spinal anesthesia and 127 did not. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Median pain scores were significantly lower in the treatment than the control group on day of surgery (DOS) (2 vs. 6; P < 0.001) and postoperative day 1 (POD1) (2 vs. 4; P < 0.001).

Results: Primary outcomes were pain scores on DOS and POD1 and inpatient opioid use. Pain scores were obtained using the 0 to 10 Numerical Rating Scale. Opioids were converted to oral morphine milliequivalents (OME). Median opioid use was also significantly lower in the treatment than the control group on DOS (0 vs. 15.00 OME; P < 0.001) and POD1 (0 vs. 7.5 OME; P < 0.001). Median length of stay between the groups was not significantly different.

Conclusion: Pre-operative morphine spinal injection for laparoscopic hysterectomy led to significantly lower pain scores and inpatient opioid consumption. Pre-operative spinal anesthesia for benign laparoscopic hysterectomy appears helpful for enhancing the postoperative experience.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜子宫切除术前的脊髓麻醉可减少术后疼痛和阿片类药物的用量。
研究目的确定腹腔镜子宫切除术前注射吗啡/布比卡因是否能减轻术后疼痛并减少住院期间阿片类药物的用量:在北卡罗来纳州的一家地区转诊中心(社区医院)进行了一项回顾性队列研究(加拿大工作组分类 II-2)。符合纳入标准的患者有 319 名:192 名接受了脊髓麻醉,127 名未接受脊髓麻醉。两组患者的基线人口统计学特征相似。治疗组在手术当天(DOS)(2 对 6;P < 0.001)和术后第 1 天(POD1)(2 对 4;P < 0.001)的疼痛评分中位数明显低于对照组:主要结果是DOS和POD1的疼痛评分以及住院患者阿片类药物的使用情况。疼痛评分采用 0-10 分数字评分量表。阿片类药物转换为口服吗啡毫当量(OME)。在DOS(0 vs. 15.00 OME;P < 0.001)和POD1(0 vs. 7.5 OME;P < 0.001)阶段,治疗组的阿片类药物用量中位数也明显低于对照组。两组的中位住院时间无明显差异:结论:腹腔镜子宫切除术的术前吗啡脊髓注射可显著降低疼痛评分和住院患者阿片类药物的消耗量。良性腹腔镜子宫切除术的术前脊髓麻醉似乎有助于改善术后体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
期刊最新文献
Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair. Inferior-Medial Approach to Laparoscopic Splenic Vessel-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy. Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEONTM Stapler in Bariatric Surgery. Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1