首页 > 最新文献

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons最新文献

英文 中文
Comparing Proficiency of Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Suturing After Training with Two Simulators. 两种模拟器训练后腹腔镜阴道袖带缝合的熟练程度比较。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00116
Emily G Lin, Megan A Runge, David Aaby, Kayla N Marshall, Jessica Traylor, Susan Tsai, Angela Chaudhari, Christopher C DeStephano, Magdy P Milad

Objective: To evaluate whether a gynecology-specific laparoscopic trainer better prepares premedical and medical students to perform a laparoscopic vaginal cuff surgical task than the current standard laparoscopic trainer.

Methods: In a masked, block-randomized controlled trial, 49 premedical and preclinical medical students were recruited, then randomized to a laparoscopic simulator: Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (EMIGS) or Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). A total of 26 participants were initially randomized to EMIGS and 23 participants to FLS. They trained for 2.5 hours on their assigned simulator. Video recordings of participants performing a laparoscopic vaginal cuff suturing task were collected before and after simulator training. Videos were masked and reviewed by expert minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) surgeons and graded using a modified Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) rubric. The pretraining and post-training GOALS scores were then compared between simulator groups.

Results: Most demographic characteristics were similar across both groups. Ultimately, 24 participants from the EMIGS group and 21 participants from the FLS group were included in the final analysis. The mean difference between post and pre-composite GOALS scores was 6.50 for EMIGS and 4.07 for FLS, P = .34. The mean EMIGS post-pre difference was greater for six of the eight individual GOALS domains, although all P-values > .05.

Conclusions: Neither EMIGS nor FLS was associated with better performance on the vaginal cuff suturing task after a single 2.5-hour training session.

目的:评价妇科专用腹腔镜培训师是否比现行标准腹腔镜培训师能更好地为医学预科生和医学生完成腹腔镜阴道袖带手术任务做好准备。方法:在一项蒙面、区域随机对照试验中,招募了49名医学预科和临床预科医学生,然后随机分配到腹腔镜模拟器:微创妇科手术基础(EMIGS)或腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)。最初共有26名参与者被随机分配到EMIGS组,23名参与者被随机分配到FLS组。他们在指定的模拟器上训练了2.5小时。在模拟器训练之前和之后,收集了参与者执行腹腔镜阴道袖带缝合任务的视频记录。视频由微创妇科外科(MIGS)专家进行屏蔽和审查,并使用修改后的全球腹腔镜手术技能评估(GOALS)评分标准进行评分。然后比较模拟器组间训练前和训练后的GOALS得分。结果:两组的大多数人口统计学特征相似。最终,来自EMIGS组的24名参与者和来自FLS组的21名参与者被纳入最终分析。综合后与综合前goal评分的平均差值分别为6.50和4.07,P = 0.34。8个单独的goal域中有6个域的平均EMIGS前后差异更大,尽管所有p值均为0.05。结论:在单次2.5小时的训练后,EMIGS和FLS均与阴道袖带缝合任务的更好表现无关。
{"title":"Comparing Proficiency of Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Suturing After Training with Two Simulators.","authors":"Emily G Lin, Megan A Runge, David Aaby, Kayla N Marshall, Jessica Traylor, Susan Tsai, Angela Chaudhari, Christopher C DeStephano, Magdy P Milad","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00116","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a gynecology-specific laparoscopic trainer better prepares premedical and medical students to perform a laparoscopic vaginal cuff surgical task than the current standard laparoscopic trainer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a masked, block-randomized controlled trial, 49 premedical and preclinical medical students were recruited, then randomized to a laparoscopic simulator: Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (EMIGS) or Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). A total of 26 participants were initially randomized to EMIGS and 23 participants to FLS. They trained for 2.5 hours on their assigned simulator. Video recordings of participants performing a laparoscopic vaginal cuff suturing task were collected before and after simulator training. Videos were masked and reviewed by expert minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) surgeons and graded using a modified Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) rubric. The pretraining and post-training GOALS scores were then compared between simulator groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most demographic characteristics were similar across both groups. Ultimately, 24 participants from the EMIGS group and 21 participants from the FLS group were included in the final analysis. The mean difference between post and pre-composite GOALS scores was 6.50 for EMIGS and 4.07 for FLS, <i>P</i> = .34. The mean EMIGS post-pre difference was greater for six of the eight individual GOALS domains, although all <i>P</i>-values > .05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neither EMIGS nor FLS was associated with better performance on the vaginal cuff suturing task after a single 2.5-hour training session.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828632/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical Perioperative Factors Influencing Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer. 影响胃癌患者术后并发症及长期生存的围手术期关键因素。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00123
He Li, Nanbo Li, Deheng Zhu, Shuangshuang Hou, Yaoyuan Chang, Qiong Duan, Ju Wu, Jiajun Yin

Objective: We aimed to determine key perioperative factors affecting postoperative complications and long-term survival in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy and to evaluate their predictive value for clinical outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients who underwent radical gastrectomy at our institution between January 2011 and December 2019. Logistic regression, along with univariate and multivariate analyses, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were utilized to identify significant factors impacting postoperative morbidity and long-term survival.

Results: Patients were categorized into complication and noncomplication groups based on postoperative outcomes. Comparative analysis revealed significant associations between postoperative complications and the following variables: sex, hypertension, serum albumin (ALB) level, lactate dehydrogenase, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), α-fetoprotein (AFP), anastomotic method, laparoscopic versus open surgery and operative time (all P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that laparoscopic versus open surgery, PNI, and hypertension were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant correlations between 3-year overall survival (OS) and age, PNI, ALB, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), tumor diameter, TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, resection extent, and reconstruction method (all P < .05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified optimal cutoff values for 3-year OS prediction: PNI (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.709, cutoff = 41.55) and tumor diameter (AUC = 0.661, cutoff = 4.75 cm). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified the following independent prognostic factors: LVI, advanced TNM stage, age, PNI, hypoalbuminemia, CEA, and CA19-9.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery and adequate nutritional status are associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative complications. The PNI, LVI, TNM stage, ALB, CA19-9, age, and CEA were identified as independent perioperative risk factors for long-term survival in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. The PNI is an independent factor influencing both short-term complications and long-term survival.

目的:探讨影响胃癌切除术患者术后并发症及远期生存的围手术期关键因素,并评价其对临床预后的预测价值。方法:我们对2011年1月至2019年12月在我院接受根治性胃切除术患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。采用Logistic回归、单因素和多因素分析以及Kaplan-Meier生存曲线来确定影响术后发病率和长期生存的重要因素。结果:根据术后结果将患者分为并发症组和非并发症组。术后并发症与性别、高血压、血清白蛋白(ALB)水平、乳酸脱氢酶、预后营养指数(PNI)、α-胎蛋白(AFP)、吻合方式、腹腔镜手术与开放手术、手术时间有显著相关性(均P < 0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,腹腔镜手术与开放手术、PNI和高血压是术后并发症的独立危险因素。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,3年总生存率(OS)与年龄、PNI、ALB、癌胚抗原(CEA)、碳水化合物抗原19-9 (CA19-9)、肿瘤直径、TNM分期、淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)、神经周围侵犯、切除程度、重建方式有显著相关性(均P < 0.05)。受试者工作特征曲线分析确定了3年OS预测的最佳截止值:PNI(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.709,截止值= 41.55)和肿瘤直径(AUC = 0.661,截止值= 4.75 cm)。单因素和多因素Cox回归分析确定了以下独立预后因素:LVI、TNM晚期、年龄、PNI、低白蛋白血症、CEA和CA19-9。结论:腹腔镜手术和适当的营养状况与减少术后并发症的发生率有关。PNI、LVI、TNM分期、ALB、CA19-9、年龄、CEA是胃癌切除术患者围手术期长期生存的独立危险因素。PNI是影响短期并发症和长期生存的独立因素。
{"title":"Critical Perioperative Factors Influencing Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer.","authors":"He Li, Nanbo Li, Deheng Zhu, Shuangshuang Hou, Yaoyuan Chang, Qiong Duan, Ju Wu, Jiajun Yin","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine key perioperative factors affecting postoperative complications and long-term survival in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy and to evaluate their predictive value for clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from patients who underwent radical gastrectomy at our institution between January 2011 and December 2019. Logistic regression, along with univariate and multivariate analyses, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were utilized to identify significant factors impacting postoperative morbidity and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were categorized into complication and noncomplication groups based on postoperative outcomes. Comparative analysis revealed significant associations between postoperative complications and the following variables: sex, hypertension, serum albumin (ALB) level, lactate dehydrogenase, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), α-fetoprotein (AFP), anastomotic method, laparoscopic versus open surgery and operative time (all <i>P</i> < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that laparoscopic versus open surgery, PNI, and hypertension were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significant correlations between 3-year overall survival (OS) and age, PNI, ALB, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), tumor diameter, TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, resection extent, and reconstruction method (all <i>P</i> < .05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified optimal cutoff values for 3-year OS prediction: PNI (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.709, cutoff = 41.55) and tumor diameter (AUC = 0.661, cutoff = 4.75 cm). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified the following independent prognostic factors: LVI, advanced TNM stage, age, PNI, hypoalbuminemia, CEA, and CA19-9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery and adequate nutritional status are associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative complications. The PNI, LVI, TNM stage, ALB, CA19-9, age, and CEA were identified as independent perioperative risk factors for long-term survival in gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. The PNI is an independent factor influencing both short-term complications and long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12915594/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146227201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
En-Bloc Stapler versus Clips for Hilar Vascular Control in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy. 固定式吻合器与夹子在腹腔镜肾切除术中控制肾门血管的效果。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-12 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00126
Abdullah Golbasi, Burak Elmaagac, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Huseyin Bicer, Berk Cilek, Murat Keske, Mert Ali Karadag

Background: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is widely preferred for its advantages over open surgery, and secure hilar control is a critical procedural step. Although both clips and staplers are commonly used, studies comparing these techniques outside the setting of donor nephrectomy remain limited. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of en-bloc stapler ligation versus separate arterial and venous clipping.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients aged 18-80 who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy between 2020 and 2025. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected, and complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Hilar control was performed either by en-bloc stapling or separate clipping. Statistical analyses included comparative tests and logistic regression, with significance set at P < .05.

Results: A total of 171 patients were analyzed (80 EndoGIA, 91 clip). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Operative time (122 vs 135 minutes; P = .004) and blood loss (175 vs 198 mL; P = .025) were lower in the EndoGIA group. Overall complication rates were similar (30% vs 28.5%; P = .500), with mostly grade I-II. Major complications were rare in both groups. No arteriovenous fistulas were detected after en-bloc stapling. Multivariate analysis identified prolonged operative time and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as independent predictors of postoperative complications.

Conclusion: Both en-bloc stapler ligation and separate clipping are safe methods for hilar control in laparoscopic nephrectomy. En-bloc stapling may reduce operative time and associated complications, offering particular advantages in complex dissections or when minimizing surgery duration is critical, thereby supporting its broader adoption in clinical practice.

背景:腹腔镜肾切除术因其优于开放手术的优点而被广泛采用,而安全的肾门控制是关键的手术步骤。虽然夹子和吻合器都是常用的,但在供肾切除术之外比较这些技术的研究仍然有限。本研究评估了整体吻合器结扎与单独动脉和静脉夹扎的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年至2025年间接受腹腔镜肾切除术的18-80岁患者。收集人口统计学、围手术期和术后数据,并使用Clavien-Dindo系统对并发症进行分类。Hilar控制可以通过整体钉接或单独裁剪进行。统计分析包括比较检验和逻辑回归,显著性为P。结果:共分析171例患者(EndoGIA 80例,clip 91例)。基线特征具有可比性。EndoGIA组手术时间(122 vs 135分钟,P = 0.004)和出血量(175 vs 198 mL, P = 0.025)较低。总体并发症发生率相似(30% vs 28.5%; P = .500),大多数为I-II级。两组的主要并发症均罕见。整体吻合术后未发现动静脉瘘。多因素分析发现,延长手术时间和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是术后并发症的独立预测因素。结论:整体吻合器结扎和单独夹持是腹腔镜肾切除术中控制肾门的安全方法。整体吻合器可以减少手术时间和相关并发症,在复杂解剖或缩短手术时间至关重要的情况下具有特殊优势,因此支持其在临床实践中的广泛采用。
{"title":"En-Bloc Stapler versus Clips for Hilar Vascular Control in Laparoscopic Nephrectomy.","authors":"Abdullah Golbasi, Burak Elmaagac, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Huseyin Bicer, Berk Cilek, Murat Keske, Mert Ali Karadag","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic nephrectomy is widely preferred for its advantages over open surgery, and secure hilar control is a critical procedural step. Although both clips and staplers are commonly used, studies comparing these techniques outside the setting of donor nephrectomy remain limited. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of en-bloc stapler ligation versus separate arterial and venous clipping.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients aged 18-80 who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy between 2020 and 2025. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected, and complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Hilar control was performed either by en-bloc stapling or separate clipping. Statistical analyses included comparative tests and logistic regression, with significance set at <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 171 patients were analyzed (80 EndoGIA, 91 clip). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Operative time (122 vs 135 minutes; <i>P</i> = .004) and blood loss (175 vs 198 mL; <i>P</i> = .025) were lower in the EndoGIA group. Overall complication rates were similar (30% vs 28.5%; <i>P</i> = .500), with mostly grade I-II. Major complications were rare in both groups. No arteriovenous fistulas were detected after en-bloc stapling. Multivariate analysis identified prolonged operative time and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as independent predictors of postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both en-bloc stapler ligation and separate clipping are safe methods for hilar control in laparoscopic nephrectomy. En-bloc stapling may reduce operative time and associated complications, offering particular advantages in complex dissections or when minimizing surgery duration is critical, thereby supporting its broader adoption in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981366/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147468838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair for Inguinal Hernia. 腹股沟疝机器人经腹腹膜前修补术与腹腔镜全腹膜外修补术的比较。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00119
Toshikatsu Nitta, Masatsugu Ishii, Akitada Sada, Ryutaro Kubo, Atsuhiro Komiya, Takashi Ishibashi

Background and objectives: To date, no Japanese studies have compared robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (R-TAPP) and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (L-TEP). Herein, we present our initial experience from a single Japanese hospital, comparing both procedures and evaluating their short-term outcomes in the context of potential inclusion under Japan's national health insurance system.

Methods: Patients with inguinal hernias who had not undergone previous anterior hernioplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic factors (age, sex, body mass index) and perioperative data were collected. Surgical variables and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent R-TAPP using the da Vinci ξ robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) and those who underwent L-TEP. Data were assessed for all, unilateral, and bilateral cases. Five surgeons participated in this study. Surgeon-specific variables, including the number of R-TAPP and L-TEP procedures performed by each surgeons, operative times, and complication rates, were also collected to evaluate the influence of the surgeon's experience on perioperative outcomes.

Results: Resident participation significantly differed between the 2 techniques across total, unilateral, and bilateral groups. In the unilateral subgroup, the mean operative time was shorter for R-TAPP (95.4 minutes) than for L-TEP (122.3 minutes). The R-TAPP group had higher costs, but complication rates were comparable. One Clavien-Dindo grade III postoperative bleeding event occurred in the L-TEP group, while only minor complications, including paralytic ileus and inferior epigastric artery injury, were observed after R-TAPP. The surgeon-specific analysis demonstrated variability in operative times among the 5 surgeons; however, 4 of the 5 surgeons showed consistently shorter operative times with R-TAPP than with L-TEP, suggesting a procedural trend favoring R-TAPP despite differences in experience.

Conclusion: Both R-TAPP and L-TEP were performed safely, with no notable differences in perioperative outcomes. However, R-TAPP may provide improved operative efficiency, particularly in primary unilateral inguinal hernias. Although surgeon experience influenced operative performance, the consistent trend toward shorter operative times across surgeons suggests that R-TAPP may offer intrinsic procedural advantages. Further prospective studies with balanced surgeon distribution and long-term follow-up are warranted.

背景和目的:迄今为止,没有日本的研究比较机器人经腹腹膜前修复(R-TAPP)和腹腔镜完全腹膜外修复(L-TEP)。在此,我们介绍了我们在一家日本医院的初步经验,比较了这两种治疗方法,并评估了它们在日本国民健康保险体系中潜在纳入的短期结果。方法:回顾性分析未行前疝成形术的腹股沟疝患者。收集人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、体重指数)和围手术期数据。比较使用达芬奇ξ机器人平台(Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA)接受R-TAPP的患者和接受L-TEP的患者的手术变量和术后结果。对所有单侧和双侧病例的数据进行评估。5名外科医生参与了这项研究。还收集了外科医生的特定变量,包括每位外科医生进行的R-TAPP和L-TEP手术的次数、手术时间和并发症发生率,以评估外科医生的经验对围手术期结果的影响。结果:两种技术在全组、单侧组和双侧组的住院医师参与显著不同。在单侧亚组中,R-TAPP的平均手术时间(95.4分钟)短于L-TEP(122.3分钟)。R-TAPP组费用较高,但并发症发生率相当。L-TEP组出现1例Clavien-Dindo III级术后出血事件,R-TAPP术后仅出现麻痹性肠梗阻、腹壁下动脉损伤等轻微并发症。手术特异性分析显示5位外科医生的手术时间存在差异;然而,5位外科医生中有4位使用R-TAPP的手术时间始终比使用L-TEP的手术时间短,这表明尽管经验不同,但手术倾向于使用R-TAPP。结论:R-TAPP和L-TEP均安全,围手术期预后无显著差异。然而,R-TAPP可以提高手术效率,特别是原发性单侧腹股沟疝。尽管外科医生的经验影响手术表现,但外科医生手术时间缩短的一致趋势表明R-TAPP可能具有内在的手术优势。进一步的前瞻性研究与平衡的外科医生分布和长期随访是必要的。
{"title":"Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair for Inguinal Hernia.","authors":"Toshikatsu Nitta, Masatsugu Ishii, Akitada Sada, Ryutaro Kubo, Atsuhiro Komiya, Takashi Ishibashi","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00119","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To date, no Japanese studies have compared robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (R-TAPP) and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair (L-TEP). Herein, we present our initial experience from a single Japanese hospital, comparing both procedures and evaluating their short-term outcomes in the context of potential inclusion under Japan's national health insurance system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with inguinal hernias who had not undergone previous anterior hernioplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic factors (age, sex, body mass index) and perioperative data were collected. Surgical variables and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent R-TAPP using the da Vinci ξ robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) and those who underwent L-TEP. Data were assessed for all, unilateral, and bilateral cases. Five surgeons participated in this study. Surgeon-specific variables, including the number of R-TAPP and L-TEP procedures performed by each surgeons, operative times, and complication rates, were also collected to evaluate the influence of the surgeon's experience on perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resident participation significantly differed between the 2 techniques across total, unilateral, and bilateral groups. In the unilateral subgroup, the mean operative time was shorter for R-TAPP (95.4 minutes) than for L-TEP (122.3 minutes). The R-TAPP group had higher costs, but complication rates were comparable. One Clavien-Dindo grade III postoperative bleeding event occurred in the L-TEP group, while only minor complications, including paralytic ileus and inferior epigastric artery injury, were observed after R-TAPP. The surgeon-specific analysis demonstrated variability in operative times among the 5 surgeons; however, 4 of the 5 surgeons showed consistently shorter operative times with R-TAPP than with L-TEP, suggesting a procedural trend favoring R-TAPP despite differences in experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both R-TAPP and L-TEP were performed safely, with no notable differences in perioperative outcomes. However, R-TAPP may provide improved operative efficiency, particularly in primary unilateral inguinal hernias. Although surgeon experience influenced operative performance, the consistent trend toward shorter operative times across surgeons suggests that R-TAPP may offer intrinsic procedural advantages. Further prospective studies with balanced surgeon distribution and long-term follow-up are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146052749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Reproducible Method of Measuring the Esophageal Hiatus and Potential Use in Hiatal Hernia Repairs. 一种可重复测量食管裂孔的方法及其在食管裂孔疝修补中的潜在应用。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00110
Hiley Cammock, Sarah Couch, Danial A Malik, Jeremy T Gaskins, Farid Kehdy

Objective: Esophageal hiatus closure during hiatal hernia repair is essential. Improper closure can lead to recurrence and high patient morbidity. Our aim is to introduce an easy and reproducible method of calculating the surface area (hiatal surface area [HSA]) of the esophageal hiatus. Standardization of this value will enable surgeons to have an evidence-based approach for hiatal hernia closure during laparoscopic repair.

Methods and procedures: We developed a measurement of HSA of the esophageal hiatus corresponding to a right-angle triangle: Area = (1/2) base × height. The height was defined as the left crus of the diaphragm. The base was defined as perpendicular to the crus and tangential to the medial edge of the esophagus. The mean esophageal hiatus surface area was calculated from deceased patients without a hiatal hernia undergoing full autopsies and compared to patients undergoing laparoscopic repair.

Results: A total of 237 (37 cadaveric) hiatuses were measured. The median HSA defect in the cadaveric group was 1.97 cm2 with an interquartile range (IQR) of 1.13 to 3.0 cm2 was significantly larger compared to 5.0 cm2 with an IQR of 3.5 to 7.5 cm2 in the operative group (P < .001). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated an overall significant positive correlation between esophageal hiatus surface area defect and the variables of age and weight but not with gender.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated a new reproducible method of measurement for esophageal hiatus. The significant difference between the two groups suggests that our formula can be utilized to develop a standardized value for the surface area of the esophageal hiatus.

目的:食管裂孔疝修补术中食管裂孔闭合是必不可少的。关闭不当可导致复发和高患者发病率。我们的目的是介绍一种简单且可重复的方法来计算食管裂孔的表面积(裂孔表面积[HSA])。该值的标准化将使外科医生在腹腔镜修补术中有一个基于证据的裂孔疝闭合方法。方法和步骤:我们建立了一种食管裂孔HSA的测量方法,对应于一个直角三角形:面积=(1/2)底×高。高度被定义为横膈膜的左小腿。基底垂直于小腿,切向食管内侧边缘。平均食管裂孔表面积的计算来自于没有裂孔疝的死亡患者,经过全面解剖,并与接受腹腔镜修复的患者进行比较。结果:共测得237个(37个尸体)裂孔。尸体组中位HSA缺损为1.97 cm2,四分位间距(IQR)为1.13 ~ 3.0 cm2,明显大于手术组的5.0 cm2,四分位间距(IQR)为3.5 ~ 7.5 cm2 (P)。两组之间的显著差异提示我们的公式可以用于制定食管裂孔表面积的标准化值。
{"title":"A Reproducible Method of Measuring the Esophageal Hiatus and Potential Use in Hiatal Hernia Repairs.","authors":"Hiley Cammock, Sarah Couch, Danial A Malik, Jeremy T Gaskins, Farid Kehdy","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Esophageal hiatus closure during hiatal hernia repair is essential. Improper closure can lead to recurrence and high patient morbidity. Our aim is to introduce an easy and reproducible method of calculating the surface area (hiatal surface area [HSA]) of the esophageal hiatus. Standardization of this value will enable surgeons to have an evidence-based approach for hiatal hernia closure during laparoscopic repair.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>We developed a measurement of HSA of the esophageal hiatus corresponding to a right-angle triangle: Area = (1/2) base × height. The height was defined as the left crus of the diaphragm. The base was defined as perpendicular to the crus and tangential to the medial edge of the esophagus. The mean esophageal hiatus surface area was calculated from deceased patients without a hiatal hernia undergoing full autopsies and compared to patients undergoing laparoscopic repair.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 237 (37 cadaveric) hiatuses were measured. The median HSA defect in the cadaveric group was 1.97 cm<sup>2</sup> with an interquartile range (IQR) of 1.13 to 3.0 cm<sup>2</sup> was significantly larger compared to 5.0 cm<sup>2</sup> with an IQR of 3.5 to 7.5 cm<sup>2</sup> in the operative group (<i>P</i> < .001). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated an overall significant positive correlation between esophageal hiatus surface area defect and the variables of age and weight but not with gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated a new reproducible method of measurement for esophageal hiatus. The significant difference between the two groups suggests that our formula can be utilized to develop a standardized value for the surface area of the esophageal hiatus.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12998976/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147486480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review of Gallbladder Anomalies. 胆囊异常的系统回顾。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00102
Hideo Takahashi, Rhea Raj, Amanda Hughes, Olivia Katz, Ganesh Gunasekaran

Background: Gallbladder anomalies are rare congenital defects resulting from developmental disruptions. These variations in shape, position, or number are often incidental findings but can present with symptomatic gallstone disease. Undiagnosed anomalies may lead to surgical complications like bile duct injuries and incomplete cholecystectomy. Despite their clinical significance, standardized guidelines remain limited. This systematic review consolidates current knowledge on classification, diagnosis, and management.

Methods: Given the rarity of gallbladder anomalies, single case reports were excluded. The database search yielded 3,789 articles, with 1,975 excluded based on language, relevance, and duplication. After screening, 164 articles underwent full-text review, and seven case series met inclusion criteria.

Results: The selected studies covered embryological development, classification, diagnostic imaging, and surgical approaches. Common imaging methods included ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and computed tomography (CT) scans.

Discussion: Gallbladder anomalies pose diagnostic and surgical challenges, increasing the risk of bile duct injury. Greater awareness and standardized guidelines are needed. This review highlights early recognition and tailored intervention to optimize outcomes, emphasizing the need for standardized protocols.

背景:胆囊异常是一种罕见的先天性缺陷,由发育障碍引起。这些形状、位置或数量的变化通常是偶然发现的,但可以表现为有症状的胆结石疾病。未确诊的异常可能导致手术并发症,如胆管损伤和不完全胆囊切除术。尽管具有临床意义,标准化的指导方针仍然有限。这个系统的审查巩固了目前的知识分类,诊断和管理。方法:考虑到胆囊异常的罕见性,排除单例报告。数据库搜索产生了3789篇文章,根据语言、相关性和重复排除了1975篇。筛选后,164篇文章进行了全文审查,7个病例系列符合纳入标准。结果:选择的研究涵盖胚胎学发育、分类、诊断成像和手术入路。常见的成像方法包括超声、磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)和计算机断层扫描(CT)。讨论:胆囊异常给诊断和手术带来了挑战,增加了胆管损伤的风险。需要提高认识和制定标准化的指导方针。这篇综述强调了早期识别和量身定制的干预以优化结果,强调了标准化方案的必要性。
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Gallbladder Anomalies.","authors":"Hideo Takahashi, Rhea Raj, Amanda Hughes, Olivia Katz, Ganesh Gunasekaran","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00102","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallbladder anomalies are rare congenital defects resulting from developmental disruptions. These variations in shape, position, or number are often incidental findings but can present with symptomatic gallstone disease. Undiagnosed anomalies may lead to surgical complications like bile duct injuries and incomplete cholecystectomy. Despite their clinical significance, standardized guidelines remain limited. This systematic review consolidates current knowledge on classification, diagnosis, and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Given the rarity of gallbladder anomalies, single case reports were excluded. The database search yielded 3,789 articles, with 1,975 excluded based on language, relevance, and duplication. After screening, 164 articles underwent full-text review, and seven case series met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The selected studies covered embryological development, classification, diagnostic imaging, and surgical approaches. Common imaging methods included ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and computed tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Gallbladder anomalies pose diagnostic and surgical challenges, increasing the risk of bile duct injury. Greater awareness and standardized guidelines are needed. This review highlights early recognition and tailored intervention to optimize outcomes, emphasizing the need for standardized protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12828709/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146052753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence Across the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeons Publication Network. 人工智能在腹腔镜和机器人外科医生协会出版网络。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2026.00007
Michael S Kavic, Raymond J Lanzafame
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Across the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeons Publication Network.","authors":"Michael S Kavic, Raymond J Lanzafame","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2026.00007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2026.00007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12998974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147486459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ruptured Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Managed by Salpingectomy: vNOTES versus Conventional Laparoscopy. 输卵管破裂异位妊娠的输卵管切除术:vNOTES与传统腹腔镜。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-18 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00114
Mehmet Genco, Merve Genco

Background: Ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy continues to pose a critical challenge in gynecologic emergencies. While conventional laparoscopy (CL) has long been the preferred operative method, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is increasingly recognized for its minimally invasive characteristics. However, comparative data between these techniques in acute cases remain scarce.

Methods: The present retrospective analysis reviewed women treated with salpingectomy for ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy between Sep 2023 and Jan 2025. Twenty-four patients were evaluated, of whom 12 underwent vNOTES and 12 underwent CL. Baseline clinical and demographic features were similar across both groups. Perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes were systematically analyzed.

Results: The vNOTES technique demonstrated a significantly reduced operative time (30 ± 10 minutes) compared to CL (41 ± 14 minutes, p < 0.05). Insufflation pressure averaged lower in the vNOTES group (8 mmHg) than in the CL group (13 mmHg), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), whereas hematocrit variations and postoperative opioid requirements remained comparable between the two methods. Pain evaluations at 1, 6, and 24 hours postsurgery indicated lower pain levels in the vNOTES cohort versus the CL cohort (p < 0.05). Shoulder tip discomfort was reported by 17% of vNOTES patients, in contrast to 83% of CL patients (p < 0.05). Hospital stay duration was markedly shorter for vNOTES recipients (36 ± 13 hours) compared to CL patients (55 ± 14 hours, p < 0.01). Pelvic drains were needed in 8 out of 12 CL cases, but none were required in the vNOTES group (p < 0.01). Neither group experienced intraoperative complications or required conversion to laparotomy. This single-center, retrospective study has limitations due to its small sample size (n = 24), limited generalizability, and reduced statistical power to detect rare complications.

Conclusions: In this cohort, vNOTES demonstrated shorter operative times, reduced insufflation pressures, and enhanced postoperative recovery compared with conventional laparoscopy. The results indicate that vNOTES could serve as a promising surgical alternative for selected patients presenting with ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Future multicenter investigations involving larger populations and extended follow-up periods-including assessments of fertility and quality of life-will be crucial to validate these findings.

背景:输卵管破裂异位妊娠仍然是妇科急诊的一个重要挑战。虽然传统腹腔镜手术(CL)一直是首选的手术方法,但经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)因其微创的特点越来越受到人们的认可。然而,这些技术在急性病例中的比较数据仍然很少。方法:回顾性分析2023年9月至2025年1月间输卵管破裂异位妊娠行输卵管切除术的妇女。对24例患者进行评估,其中12例行vNOTES, 12例行CL。两组的基线临床和人口学特征相似。系统分析围手术期及术后短期结果。结果:vNOTES技术比CL(41±14分钟)明显缩短手术时间(30±10分钟),p < 0.05。vNOTES组的平均注入压力(8 mmHg)低于CL组(13 mmHg),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05),而两种方法之间的红细胞压差变化和术后阿片类药物需求保持相当。术后1、6和24小时的疼痛评估显示,vNOTES组的疼痛水平低于CL组(p < 0.05)。17%的vNOTES患者报告肩尖不适,而83%的CL患者报告肩尖不适(p < 0.05)。vNOTES患者的住院时间(36±13小时)明显短于CL患者(55±14小时,p < 0.01)。12例CL患者中有8例需要盆腔引流,而vNOTES组不需要(p < 0.01)。两组均未出现术中并发症或需要转开腹手术。这项单中心回顾性研究由于样本量小(n = 24)、推广能力有限以及发现罕见并发症的统计能力降低而存在局限性。结论:在这个队列中,与传统腹腔镜相比,vNOTES显示出更短的手术时间,更低的充气压力和更高的术后恢复。结果表明,vNOTES可以作为一种有希望的手术替代选择的患者出现破裂的异位妊娠。未来的多中心调查涉及更大的人群和更长的随访期,包括对生育和生活质量的评估,将是验证这些发现的关键。
{"title":"Ruptured Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Managed by Salpingectomy: vNOTES versus Conventional Laparoscopy.","authors":"Mehmet Genco, Merve Genco","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy continues to pose a critical challenge in gynecologic emergencies. While conventional laparoscopy (CL) has long been the preferred operative method, transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is increasingly recognized for its minimally invasive characteristics. However, comparative data between these techniques in acute cases remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present retrospective analysis reviewed women treated with salpingectomy for ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy between Sep 2023 and Jan 2025. Twenty-four patients were evaluated, of whom 12 underwent vNOTES and 12 underwent CL. Baseline clinical and demographic features were similar across both groups. Perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes were systematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vNOTES technique demonstrated a significantly reduced operative time (30 ± 10 minutes) compared to CL (41 ± 14 minutes, p < 0.05). Insufflation pressure averaged lower in the vNOTES group (8 mmHg) than in the CL group (13 mmHg), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), whereas hematocrit variations and postoperative opioid requirements remained comparable between the two methods. Pain evaluations at 1, 6, and 24 hours postsurgery indicated lower pain levels in the vNOTES cohort versus the CL cohort (p < 0.05). Shoulder tip discomfort was reported by 17% of vNOTES patients, in contrast to 83% of CL patients (p < 0.05). Hospital stay duration was markedly shorter for vNOTES recipients (36 ± 13 hours) compared to CL patients (55 ± 14 hours, p < 0.01). Pelvic drains were needed in 8 out of 12 CL cases, but none were required in the vNOTES group (p < 0.01). Neither group experienced intraoperative complications or required conversion to laparotomy. This single-center, retrospective study has limitations due to its small sample size (n = 24), limited generalizability, and reduced statistical power to detect rare complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort, vNOTES demonstrated shorter operative times, reduced insufflation pressures, and enhanced postoperative recovery compared with conventional laparoscopy. The results indicate that vNOTES could serve as a promising surgical alternative for selected patients presenting with ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Future multicenter investigations involving larger populations and extended follow-up periods-including assessments of fertility and quality of life-will be crucial to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12998975/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147486531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Complicated Tubo-Ovarian Abscess Surgery. 复杂输卵管卵巢脓肿手术的危险因素。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00131
Alaattin Karabulut, Sercan Kantarcı, Sevim Selen Karabulut, Uğurcan Dağlı, Didem Sezen, Alper İleri, Abdurrahman Hamdi İnan, Volkan Karataşlı

Objective: To identify clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and operative factors associated with intraoperative complications during surgical management of tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA), and to describe evolving surgical trends over a 10-year period.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 177 women who underwent operative treatment for TOA between January 2015 and June 2025 at a tertiary referral center. Demographic variables, laboratory parameters, radiologic findings, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were extracted from institutional records. Patients were grouped as uncomplicated or complicated according to the presence of bowel, bladder, or ureteral injury. Groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests.

Results: Of 177 patients, 9 (5.1%) experienced intraoperative organ injury. Complicated cases were significantly older (49 vs 42 years, P = .006) and exhibited higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (299 vs 188 mg/L, P = .004), higher platelet counts (544,000 vs 351,000/µL, P = .002), elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (240.9 vs 186.8, P = .010), and lower mean platelet volume (MPV) (7.80 vs 8.70 fL, P = .019). Abscess size and bilaterality were not associated with complications. Extensive surgery was more frequently performed in the complicated group. A pronounced shift toward minimally invasive surgery was observed, with laparoscopy becoming the predominant approach after 2023 and all cases in early 2025 performed laparoscopically. Complicated surgeries were associated with longer operative times, greater postoperative hemoglobin decline, prolonged hospitalization, and markedly higher reoperation rates.

Conclusion: Older age, elevated inflammatory markers, and altered platelet indices may help identify patients at increased risk of operative difficulty. The growing use of laparoscopy supports its role as a feasible and increasingly preferred surgical approach in the management of TOA.

目的:探讨输卵管卵巢脓肿(TOA)手术治疗过程中与术中并发症相关的临床、实验室、放射学和手术因素,并描述10年来手术的发展趋势。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了177名2015年1月至2025年6月在三级转诊中心接受手术治疗的TOA妇女。人口统计学变量、实验室参数、放射学发现、手术细节和术后结果从机构记录中提取。根据有无肠、膀胱或输尿管损伤,将患者分为无并发症或并发症。采用适当的统计检验对各组进行比较。结果:177例患者中有9例(5.1%)发生术中器官损伤。并发症患者年龄较大(49岁vs 42岁,P = 0.006), c反应蛋白(CRP)水平较高(299 vs 188 mg/L, P = 0.004),血小板计数较高(544,000 vs 351,000/ μ L, P = 0.002),血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)升高(240.9 vs 186.8, P = 0.010),平均血小板体积(MPV)较低(7.80 vs 8.70 fL, P = 0.019)。脓肿大小和双侧性与并发症无关。并发症组多行大范围手术。观察到微创手术的明显转变,腹腔镜成为2023年后的主要方法,2025年初的所有病例都进行了腹腔镜手术。复杂手术与手术时间延长、术后血红蛋白下降、住院时间延长、再手术率明显增高有关。结论:年龄较大、炎症标志物升高和血小板指数改变可能有助于识别手术困难风险增加的患者。腹腔镜越来越多的应用支持其作为一种可行的和越来越受欢迎的手术方法在TOA的管理。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Complicated Tubo-Ovarian Abscess Surgery.","authors":"Alaattin Karabulut, Sercan Kantarcı, Sevim Selen Karabulut, Uğurcan Dağlı, Didem Sezen, Alper İleri, Abdurrahman Hamdi İnan, Volkan Karataşlı","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and operative factors associated with intraoperative complications during surgical management of tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA), and to describe evolving surgical trends over a 10-year period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 177 women who underwent operative treatment for TOA between January 2015 and June 2025 at a tertiary referral center. Demographic variables, laboratory parameters, radiologic findings, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were extracted from institutional records. Patients were grouped as uncomplicated or complicated according to the presence of bowel, bladder, or ureteral injury. Groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 177 patients, 9 (5.1%) experienced intraoperative organ injury. Complicated cases were significantly older (49 vs 42 years, <i>P</i> = .006) and exhibited higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (299 vs 188 mg/L, <i>P</i> = .004), higher platelet counts (544,000 vs 351,000/µL, <i>P</i> = .002), elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (240.9 vs 186.8, <i>P</i> = .010), and lower mean platelet volume (MPV) (7.80 vs 8.70 fL, <i>P</i> = .019). Abscess size and bilaterality were not associated with complications. Extensive surgery was more frequently performed in the complicated group. A pronounced shift toward minimally invasive surgery was observed, with laparoscopy becoming the predominant approach after 2023 and all cases in early 2025 performed laparoscopically. Complicated surgeries were associated with longer operative times, greater postoperative hemoglobin decline, prolonged hospitalization, and markedly higher reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older age, elevated inflammatory markers, and altered platelet indices may help identify patients at increased risk of operative difficulty. The growing use of laparoscopy supports its role as a feasible and increasingly preferred surgical approach in the management of TOA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12915593/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146227204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of a Safe Cost Reduction Strategy for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. 腹腔镜袖式胃切除术安全降本策略的实施。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00099
Scott Z Mu, Moamena El-Matbouly, Hector M Lopez, Alan A Saber

Background: We conducted a quality improvement initiative aimed at reducing operating room disposable supply costs during sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods: We implemented a cost reduction strategy for all sleeve gastrectomy operations at a single center which involved switching from ECHELON+ stapler with routine use staple line buttressing to a single-fire stapler (Titan SGS) to standardize the amount of staple reloads and afterwards, switching to the easyEndoLite stapler with shorter staple heights and selective use of staple line reinforcements and clip appliers.

Results: We included 638 cases of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed from January 2020 to June 2024. There were no significant differences in the total operating room supply costs after switching to a single-fire stapler, but after switching to a less costly stapler and selectively using staple line reinforcements and clip appliers, we demonstrated a cost savings of $1,283 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $1,216 to $1,351) per case (P < .001), without any differences in length of stay or 30-day weight loss or risk of reoperation or readmission.

Conclusion: During sleeve gastrectomy, surgeons should consider adopting operating room cost-reduction strategies such as selective use of clip appliers, judicious usage of staple line reinforcement material, and choosing less costly stapler devices.

背景:我们开展了一项旨在降低袖式胃切除术期间手术室一次性用品成本的质量改进计划。方法:我们在一个中心对所有袖式胃切除术实施了降低成本的策略,包括从常规使用钉线支撑的ECHELON+订书机切换到单fire订书机(Titan SGS),以规范钉线重新装填的数量,然后切换到较短钉线高度的easyEndoLite订书机,并有选择性地使用钉线增强和夹钳。结果:我们纳入了从2020年1月至2024年6月进行的638例原发性腹腔镜袖式胃切除术。切换到单火灾订书机后,总手术室供应成本没有显着差异,但切换到更便宜的订书机并有选择性地使用订书机线增强和夹子应用器后,我们证明每个病例的成本节省了1,283美元(95%置信区间[CI]: 1,216美元至1,351美元)(P < 0.001),住院时间或30天体重减轻或再手术或再入院风险没有任何差异。结论:在袖式胃切除术中,外科医生应考虑采取降低手术室成本的策略,如选择性使用夹钳、合理使用钉线加固材料、选择价格较低的钉针装置等。
{"title":"Implementation of a Safe Cost Reduction Strategy for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.","authors":"Scott Z Mu, Moamena El-Matbouly, Hector M Lopez, Alan A Saber","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00099","DOIUrl":"10.4293/JSLS.2025.00099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted a quality improvement initiative aimed at reducing operating room disposable supply costs during sleeve gastrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a cost reduction strategy for all sleeve gastrectomy operations at a single center which involved switching from ECHELON+ stapler with routine use staple line buttressing to a single-fire stapler (Titan SGS) to standardize the amount of staple reloads and afterwards, switching to the easyEndoLite stapler with shorter staple heights and selective use of staple line reinforcements and clip appliers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 638 cases of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy performed from January 2020 to June 2024. There were no significant differences in the total operating room supply costs after switching to a single-fire stapler, but after switching to a less costly stapler and selectively using staple line reinforcements and clip appliers, we demonstrated a cost savings of $1,283 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $1,216 to $1,351) per case (<i>P</i> < .001), without any differences in length of stay or 30-day weight loss or risk of reoperation or readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During sleeve gastrectomy, surgeons should consider adopting operating room cost-reduction strategies such as selective use of clip appliers, judicious usage of staple line reinforcement material, and choosing less costly stapler devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12857588/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146105946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1