Research across disciplines: influence of human resource management practices

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Management Decision Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1108/md-03-2023-0397
Fernando Martín-Alcázar, Marta Ruiz-Martínez, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey
{"title":"Research across disciplines: influence of human resource management practices","authors":"Fernando Martín-Alcázar, Marta Ruiz-Martínez, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey","doi":"10.1108/md-03-2023-0397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to examine the connection between scholars' research performance and the multidisciplinary nature of their collaborative research. Furthermore, in response to mixed results regarding the effects of multidisciplinarity on research performance, this study explores how human resource management (HRM) practices may moderate this link.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors built a model based on the theoretical arguments and empirical evidence found in the review of diversity and HRM literature. The authors also performed a quantitative study based on a sample of scholars in the field of management. Different econometric estimations were used to test the proposed model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results of this empirical analysis suggest that multidisciplinary research has a non-linear effect on research performance. Certain HRM practices, such as development and collaboration, moderated the curvilinear relationship between multidisciplinarity and performance, displacing the optimum to allow higher performance at higher levels of multidisciplinary research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper provides advances on previous works studying the curvilinear relationship between multidisciplinarity and the researchers' performance, confirming that multidisciplinarity is beneficial up to a threshold beyond which these benefits are attenuated. In addition, the findings shed light on important issues related to team-oriented HRM practices associated with the outcomes of multidisciplinary research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18046,"journal":{"name":"Management Decision","volume":"10 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Decision","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2023-0397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the connection between scholars' research performance and the multidisciplinary nature of their collaborative research. Furthermore, in response to mixed results regarding the effects of multidisciplinarity on research performance, this study explores how human resource management (HRM) practices may moderate this link.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors built a model based on the theoretical arguments and empirical evidence found in the review of diversity and HRM literature. The authors also performed a quantitative study based on a sample of scholars in the field of management. Different econometric estimations were used to test the proposed model.

Findings

The results of this empirical analysis suggest that multidisciplinary research has a non-linear effect on research performance. Certain HRM practices, such as development and collaboration, moderated the curvilinear relationship between multidisciplinarity and performance, displacing the optimum to allow higher performance at higher levels of multidisciplinary research.

Originality/value

The paper provides advances on previous works studying the curvilinear relationship between multidisciplinarity and the researchers' performance, confirming that multidisciplinarity is beneficial up to a threshold beyond which these benefits are attenuated. In addition, the findings shed light on important issues related to team-oriented HRM practices associated with the outcomes of multidisciplinary research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨学科研究:人力资源管理实践的影响
目的 本研究旨在探讨学者的研究绩效与其合作研究的多学科性质之间的联系。此外,鉴于多学科性对研究绩效的影响结果不一,本研究探讨了人力资源管理(HRM)实践可能如何缓和这种联系。设计/方法/途径作者根据多样性和人力资源管理文献综述中的理论论点和经验证据建立了一个模型。作者还以管理领域的学者为样本进行了定量研究。实证分析的结果表明,多学科研究对研究绩效具有非线性影响。某些人力资源管理实践,如发展与合作,调节了多学科性与绩效之间的曲线关系,取代了最佳值,使更高水平的多学科研究产生更高的绩效。原创性/价值本文在以往研究多学科性与研究人员绩效之间曲线关系的基础上取得了进展,证实了多学科性在一定临界值内是有益的,超过该临界值,这些益处就会减弱。此外,研究结果还揭示了与多学科研究成果相关的以团队为导向的人力资源管理实践的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: ■In-depth studies of major issues ■Operations management ■Financial management ■Motivation ■Entrepreneurship ■Problem solving and proactivity ■Serious management argument ■Strategy and policy issues ■Tactics for turning around company crises Management Decision, considered by many to be the best publication in its field, consistently offers thoughtful and provocative insights into current management practice. As such, its high calibre contributions from leading management philosophers and practitioners make it an invaluable resource in the aggressive and demanding trading climate of the Twenty-First Century.
期刊最新文献
Compassion, value creation and digital learning orientation in social entrepreneurs The impact of supply chain revamping announcements on shareholder value Prioritizing factors for generative artificial intelligence-based innovation adoption in hospitality industry Exploring the role of heuristics in buyer–supplier relationship dynamics Understanding behavioral strategy: a historical evolutionary perspective in “Management Decision”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1