Sedation with propofol and isoflurane differs in terms of microcirculatory parameters: A randomized animal study using dorsal skinfold chamber mouse model

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Microvascular research Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104655
Christine Kang , Ah-Reum Cho , Haekyu Kim , Jae-Young Kwon , Hyeon Jeong Lee , Eunsoo Kim
{"title":"Sedation with propofol and isoflurane differs in terms of microcirculatory parameters: A randomized animal study using dorsal skinfold chamber mouse model","authors":"Christine Kang ,&nbsp;Ah-Reum Cho ,&nbsp;Haekyu Kim ,&nbsp;Jae-Young Kwon ,&nbsp;Hyeon Jeong Lee ,&nbsp;Eunsoo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to explore the effects of sedative doses of propofol and isoflurane on microcirculation in septic mice compared to controls. Isoflurane, known for its potential as a sedation drug in bedside applications, lacks clarity regarding its impact on the microcirculation system. The hypothesis was that propofol would exert a more pronounced influence on the microvascular flow index, particularly amplified in septic conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Randomized study was conducted from December 2020 to October 2021 involved 60 BALB/c mice, with 52 mice analyzed. Dorsal skinfold chambers were implanted, followed by intraperitoneal injections of either sterile 0.9 % saline or lipopolysaccharide for the control and sepsis groups, respectively. Both groups received propofol or isoflurane treatment for 120 min. Microcirculatory parameters were obtained via incident dark-field microscopy videos, along with the mean blood pressure and heart rate at three time points: before sedation (T0), 30 min after sedation (T30), and 120 min after sedation (T120). Endothelial glycocalyx thickness and syndecan-1 concentration were also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In healthy controls, both anesthetics reduced blood pressure. However, propofol maintained microvascular flow, differing significantly from isoflurane at T120 (propofol, 2.8 ± 0.3 vs. isoflurane, 1.6 ± 0.9; <em>P &lt;</em> 0.001). In the sepsis group, a similar pattern occurred at T120 without statistical significance (propofol, 1.8 ± 1.1 vs. isoflurane, 1.2 ± 0.7; <em>P =</em> 0.023). Syndecan-1 levels did not differ between agents, but glycocalyx thickness index was significantly lower in the isoflurane-sepsis group than propofol (<em>P =</em> 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Propofol potentially offers protective action against microvascular flow deterioration compared to isoflurane, observed in control mice. Furthermore, a lower degree of sepsis-induced glycocalyx degradation was evident with propofol compared to isoflurane.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18534,"journal":{"name":"Microvascular research","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 104655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026286224000049/pdfft?md5=9386c111a44d4fbaa0e5cc10863b0dfa&pid=1-s2.0-S0026286224000049-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microvascular research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026286224000049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to explore the effects of sedative doses of propofol and isoflurane on microcirculation in septic mice compared to controls. Isoflurane, known for its potential as a sedation drug in bedside applications, lacks clarity regarding its impact on the microcirculation system. The hypothesis was that propofol would exert a more pronounced influence on the microvascular flow index, particularly amplified in septic conditions.

Material and methods

Randomized study was conducted from December 2020 to October 2021 involved 60 BALB/c mice, with 52 mice analyzed. Dorsal skinfold chambers were implanted, followed by intraperitoneal injections of either sterile 0.9 % saline or lipopolysaccharide for the control and sepsis groups, respectively. Both groups received propofol or isoflurane treatment for 120 min. Microcirculatory parameters were obtained via incident dark-field microscopy videos, along with the mean blood pressure and heart rate at three time points: before sedation (T0), 30 min after sedation (T30), and 120 min after sedation (T120). Endothelial glycocalyx thickness and syndecan-1 concentration were also analyzed.

Results

In healthy controls, both anesthetics reduced blood pressure. However, propofol maintained microvascular flow, differing significantly from isoflurane at T120 (propofol, 2.8 ± 0.3 vs. isoflurane, 1.6 ± 0.9; P < 0.001). In the sepsis group, a similar pattern occurred at T120 without statistical significance (propofol, 1.8 ± 1.1 vs. isoflurane, 1.2 ± 0.7; P = 0.023). Syndecan-1 levels did not differ between agents, but glycocalyx thickness index was significantly lower in the isoflurane-sepsis group than propofol (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Propofol potentially offers protective action against microvascular flow deterioration compared to isoflurane, observed in control mice. Furthermore, a lower degree of sepsis-induced glycocalyx degradation was evident with propofol compared to isoflurane.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异丙酚和异氟醚镇静在微循环参数方面存在差异:使用背侧皮褶室小鼠模型进行的随机动物研究
本研究旨在探讨与对照组相比,镇静剂量的异丙酚和异氟醚对脓毒症小鼠微循环的影响。异氟醚因其作为床旁镇静药物的潜力而闻名,但其对微循环系统的影响尚不明确。材料和方法于 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 10 月进行了随机研究,涉及 60 只 BALB/c 小鼠,分析了 52 只小鼠。对照组和败血症组分别植入背侧皮褶室,然后腹腔注射无菌 0.9 % 生理盐水或脂多糖。两组均接受异丙酚或异氟醚治疗 120 分钟。通过事件暗视野显微镜视频获得微循环参数以及三个时间点的平均血压和心率:镇静前(T0)、镇静后 30 分钟(T30)和镇静后 120 分钟(T120)。结果在健康对照组中,两种麻醉剂都能降低血压。然而,丙泊酚能维持微血管流量,在 T120 时与异氟醚有显著差异(丙泊酚,2.8 ± 0.3 vs. 异氟醚,1.6 ± 0.9;P < 0.001)。脓毒症组在 T120 出现类似模式,但无统计学意义(丙泊酚,1.8 ± 1.1 vs. 异氟醚,1.2 ± 0.7;P = 0.023)。结论与异氟醚相比,异丙酚具有潜在的保护作用,可防止小鼠微血管流动恶化。此外,与异氟醚相比,丙泊酚可明显降低败血症引起的糖萼降解程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microvascular research
Microvascular research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
158
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Microvascular Research is dedicated to the dissemination of fundamental information related to the microvascular field. Full-length articles presenting the results of original research and brief communications are featured. Research Areas include: • Angiogenesis • Biochemistry • Bioengineering • Biomathematics • Biophysics • Cancer • Circulatory homeostasis • Comparative physiology • Drug delivery • Neuropharmacology • Microvascular pathology • Rheology • Tissue Engineering.
期刊最新文献
Functional heterogeneity of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation in different order branches of mesenteric artery in female/male mice. Muscle tissue oxygenation in individuals with peripheral arterial disease of different walking abilities: An exploratory study. Retinal microvascular dysfunction in systemic sclerosis. Prevalence of microvascular complications and associated factors among diabetes mellitus patients in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Low-grade hemodilution improves the microcirculatory function in surgical patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1